Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: size ?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,867

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Thanks. I work out.*

    Karen

    *which means it's not an accident that I think that way, and attitude is everything.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmyt View Post
    2-4 XS
    6-8 S
    10-12 M
    14-16 L
    18-20 XL

    etc. etc. etc.
    Grrr... no clothes in my size. I can fit a child's size L or XL... but I really hate going into the kiddie section...

    At least bike clothes are stretchy-shrinky, I can try them on without feeling like such a knob.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Marin County CA
    Posts
    5,936
    Quote Originally Posted by Popoki_Nui View Post
    I'm not hugely overweight but I do need to lose my tummy, so I wear 16 if it's a good quality garment or 18 if it's some cheaper/off brand item. Same with shoes
    Hold the phone.... I don't think you meant you were a size 16-18 in shoes, right??

    I'm an 11 in shoes. I was a 10 before I had my daughter and went up a full size. 11 is tough enough, but if I were to have another kid, I'd have to shop at the drag queen stores for shoes.
    Sarah

    When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.


    2011 Volagi Liscio
    2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
    2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
    2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
    2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by maillotpois View Post
    Hold the phone.... I don't think you meant you were a size 16-18 in shoes, right??

    I'm an 11 in shoes. I was a 10 before I had my daughter and went up a full size. 11 is tough enough, but if I were to have another kid, I'd have to shop at the drag queen stores for shoes.
    Maillotpois - you made me laugh...I'm a 10 now too, and I worry what will happen when I do have kids!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    531
    Quote Originally Posted by maillotpois View Post
    Hold the phone.... I don't think you meant you were a size 16-18 in shoes, right??
    LOL. It does kinda sound like it, doesn't it?!
    But no, I take a size 9 if it is a good quality shoe, and up to 10 or 10 1/2 for crappy stuff (like the cheap sneakers and boots I buy just for working around the property and such...size 9 never fits).
    All vintage, all the time.
    Falcon Black Diamond
    Gitane Tour de France
    Kuwahara Sierra Grande MTB
    Bianchi Super Grizzly MTB

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Popoki_Nui View Post
    Nice one!
    I do a slow burn every time I shop for clothes. I'm not hugely overweight but I do need to lose my tummy, so I wear 16 if it's a good quality garment or 18 if it's some cheaper/off brand item. Same with shoes
    I was wearing size 14 in high school 30 years ago, and didn't have an ounce of fat. Now, I just shop for comfort and don't give a toss about what size something is.
    You can't compare today's sizing with that of 30 or more years ago. Vanity sizing has completely changed everything. A size 10 of the 60s is about a 6 now. There are 2 exceptions: Bridal wear and pattern sizing. Next time you go by a Joann's or Hancock's, go in, pull a pattern and look at the measurements for various sizes. They are still true to the original American sizing system.

    Does anybody remember when blouses were sized 30, 32, 34, etc?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle View Post
    You can't compare today's sizing with that of 30 or more years ago. Vanity sizing has completely changed everything. A size 10 of the 60s is about a 6 now.
    You're exactly right. Back then there was no need for a size zero or (gasp) double zero! I have to admit to liking the modern sizing better, but they can't keep making sizes larger and larger lest the tiniest women start needing negative sizes!

    Emily
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387
    Luckily, I like my size 10-12-14-16-18's baggy enough that when my weight fluctuates, my clothes still mostly fit.

    Nanci
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •