I think it's OKAY for us to have different definitions of what a "cyclist" is.
It's a definition that likely cannot be agreed upon here. All we can really do is state our various opinions of what it means to us as individuals. No one is Right or Wrong. Unfortunately, it often happens that one person will state their opinion and another will take exception to it and feel compelled to prove them "wrong", or just get angry about it. Language is such that most terms and words have varying definitions to different people- useless to argue about whose definition is more or less correct.
Lisa
My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
My personal blog:My blog
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So, you have a logical issue with saying ANYBODY who throws a football... I have that problem with your global ANYONE who ever uses a sidewalk not being "an athlete" "maximizing my efforts" etc. etc. The rather obvious implication is that I don't train, don't work hard, and don't follow the rules of the road because I get on a sidewalk when it makes sense - since you say that you are a cyclist because you train and work hard at riding your bike. If I am not a ;cyclist, that woudl imply that I don't.
However, i am simply positive that you work harder and train harder than I ever will. *That's* what makes you 'More" of a cyclist... at least a certain kind... *not* that you never cross off the road to go slower for a little while.
Instead of people being "more" or "less" of a cyclist, how about just saying there are different kinds of cyclists?: Professional cyclists, competition cyclists, fitness cyclists, and purely recreational cyclists. One could be more than one type too, like a competition mtn bike racer who rides in the park with their kids on the weekend! (maybe even going on the sidewalk!)
Lisa
My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
My personal blog:My blog
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What is a cyclist?
This has actually been on my mind lately and something I'm trying to figure out.
I'm new to "cycling" though I've been riding bikes since I was like 5. For me it was just about the only alternative left since I hate running and I've gotten really sick of going to the gym. So I just started... and I found out I enjoy it.
However, I haven't ridden since Tday with holidays, family and other social stuff going on. In that time I've been contemplating this question since I feel all this guilt or feeling like a "slacker" since I'm not out there doing my 100 miles a week like some folks. In some sense this has been good cuz it gives me perspective.
When did biking become cycling to me? When did I need to don my fancy clothes (of which I don't have many really) to just ride to work?? I mean I went to UC Davis for god's sake and spent (cough) all my college years biking around in jeans and sweats in the friggin wind, rain and cold on a used bike from the bike auction. I didn't even have a car for 2-3 years. Walking or riding were my only alternatives.
Then I was reading thru Rivendell's site and their pragmatic approach to cycling/biking was really fresh air to me.
"Special clothing just to ride a bike? Are you sure?
(This is kind of a long rant.)
If you have any doubts that you can ride in normal clothing, consider that 200 million people worldwide do it every day. So it comes down to clothing for "serious, performance cycling," and that's when the clothing starts to look and feel funny. Based on the snug-fitting clothing of the famous comic book superheros, cycling clothing has continued to devolve to its current state, which is: "
So yesterday morning, I just jumped on my little mtn bike with my jeans and geeky reflective cuff velcro thingy and went to work.
What am saying.. rambling? I guess ...that we are privileged to live in a country that gives us the choice to be cyclists. And that as long as I am aware of that, I've defined it for myself. I've defined my "circles." Will I keep buying stuff. Ya betcha cuz I love shoppingAnd will I train for the Terra Bella and the Cindy.. yup as much as my life will allow me at the moment.
But.. I have to remember that cycling is one of my hobbies and I'm a damn, friggin lucky a$$ bastard to have that choice.
I'll leave this morning's contemplation with this photo. The lady in the picture below has my respect and awe. I took this when my tour bus had an engine problem outside of Shanghai. While we were just wandering around stretching our legs, this lady just came riding up on the opposite side of road, toting her load and then quietly just disappeared into the horizon. She "trains" everyday because she has no choice. And she's definitely not a a weight weeny! And god knows how far she has to go everyday..
This picture just makes me laugh at myself but also makes me feel very lucky.
Enjoy...keep on pedaling (I'm off to work .. in my jeans)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok, I really really really didn't mean to set off that discussion of "what is a cyclist" It was meant rhetorically. I though it was clear when I listed the definition from websters that anyone who cycles is a cyclist. My point was we that we shouldn't bother categorizing and giving a name to what we are and what we do. We are all on this board becuase we share an interest in riding bicycles. We are all different levels of experience and invovlement, but all with one purpose. Please try to remember this and lets get back to discussing the relevant things like how far we've ridden today or how many scars we have from falling with clipless pedals or if we prefer sports beans over bananas...
It's only worth it if you're having fun
This reminds me of something I read on another site. A bunch of cyclists stopped at a small grocery out in the country to buy water, and had to walk by a bunch of guys with Harleys to go inside.
They all started talking and laughing, and the guys on Harleys were a lot more accepting of the guys in spandex than they feared, until one of the cyclists referred to himself as a "biker."
One of the big Harley guys growled, "Son, WE'RE the bikers. YOU'RE the bikEEs."
Badabing.
“Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”
hmmmm.....all those circles, and I'm not exempt.
I am a beer snob. Yes, it's true. I just won't drink it if I just don't love it. No Bud, Labatt's, Canadian, Miller, etc in my house! If it isn't Sleeman's, Granville Island, Bowen Island or some micro brew that the average person has never heard of, I just won't drink it. Thanks for the offer, but, uh, no thanks.
heh.
I'm also not a photographer. I'm a photo enhusiast.
What the heck, everything else is labeled!!
Hugs and butterflies,
~T~
The butterflies are within you.
My photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsiechick/
Buy my photos: http://www.picsiechick.com
I listen to the evening news while cooking dinner. Reports of a cyclist hit by a car stop me in my tracks. I find myself hanging on every word trying to identify, is this a cyclist or someone on a bike? Without thought I try to identify if this was someone who was aware of the laws and following them. Yes, I try to identify if it is someone in "my group" or not. I am struck harder if someone I consider a cyclist has been injured. It's not that I care less for the other person it's just that it feels more like it could have been me. I can relate to this person and their level of risk more.
At my work, we are in the process of creating small groups of people with related interests. We have groups who like to work out before daylight in the morning. We have a tri-athlete group. We have a group of seniors, people who like to cook, a book club, a group of attorneys who drink wine and ride bikes......The goal is not to exclude people but to create a sense of family, community. We are pack animals. We like to belong. We enjoy being around people who have something in common with us. We enjoy meeting people with shared interest. Why must we feel that creating communities is excluding someone who doesnt share our interests? I belong to so many different communities. I rarely blend these groups together. I enjoy hanging with my cyclists friends on some occasions and my foodie friends on others. If you are not part of this group it just means we don't share this interest.
Don't let your emotions get in the way of healthy debate. Isn't the idea here to get together a bunch of people from different places with different ideas. Isn't it more interesting if we disagree, argue and debate? One group you can exclude me from is the one where everyone agrees with everything I say.
Just my 2 cents.
Welp, it's legal. I'm still rolling my eyes at your condescension - actually, I have no reason to assume you train harder than I do and are "more of a cyclist" even by *your* definition. My 8o00+ miles last year didn't all come on the sidewalks.
But... here's the bigger issue:
I really love cycling - and not just so I can win things. I think it can improve the whole planet and so many of the people in it.
Are you assuming that I like (or even accept) the fact that to keep my skin, I have to negotiate sidewalks instead of being reasonably safe on the roads? If that's why you hold sidewalkers in contempt... what are you doing about it?
I mean, besides being condescending to people riding on the sidewalks?
Does that make the roads safer? Do you honestly think that brings those people out onto the roads?
No, in fact, it makes those sidewalker think "oh, okay, I'm just not *brave* enough for this. They are. Must be something wrong with me, not with the way the roads are designed. I can't expect better. Roads were made for cars."
Yes, one of the reasons I don't like riding on the sidewalk is because I don't like the message it sends to drivers or other cyclists or possible future cyclists.
I'm on our town's Bicycling and Pedestrian Advisory commission, I'm on the board of the League of Illinois Bicyclists; I write letters, I've been on the telly. ...but more than all that, IMO, I *ride* visibly and often, and do my utmost to get others to do so by leading beginner rides and just being a "normal" person who rides a bicycle to show it's a feasible option.
I want our roads to be places where cyclists can ride safely and efficiently. Right now that ain't the case. Some places, it is for people who have the courage and conviction and speed to negotiate the traffic - but so many, many people think that there's no need to make the roads safe for cyclists. They think that there's no reason to divert funds or inconvenience motorists for a bunch of Lance wannabees - let's face it, we wouldn't do that for hockey players, would we? Why should the public support your recreational pursuit?
I love cycling . I think it can do far more good than the benefits that athletics provide. There are so many current Stupid Problems that bicycling helps with, either a little or a lot, either individually (health) or societally (let's slow down and talk to each other!) or environmentally, or.. or..
HOwever, cyclists are a barely significant minority - even here. On the third hand, I talk to so many people who would *love* to ride more, either for fitness or instead of driving - but there are barriers.
Do you want to be one of those barriers?
... my most recent motorbiker interaction: pulled up to the Blarney Stone (only place for food in Ivesdale) as three motorbikes pulled up.
"Lance!"
We just grinned, went in... and then met the same group at teh Sadorus Pub which was our next stop... yea, our ration of riding to drinking was a little higher than theirs![]()
Last edited by Geonz; 01-10-2007 at 06:08 AM.