Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North Andover, Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    1,643
    I can't imagine wearing anything under my bike shorts, even for short rides. Just the shorts!
    www.denisegoldberg.com

    • Click here for links to journals and photo galleries from my travels on two wheels and two feet.
    • Random thoughts and experiences in my blog at denisegoldberg.blogspot.com


    "To truly find yourself you should play hide and seek alone."
    (quote courtesy of an unknown fortune cookie writer)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    I tried one time (can't remember why I even felt the need) to wear panties under my shorts and ugh, I felt awful. It nothing else, panties got wet and retained water while the bike shorts would normally wick away the wetness. Plus there was bunching and binding and all that. Just felt like I have on a big wet diaper.

    I do have several pairs of shorts (well maybe more than that) so I never wear a pair again until they are washed. But I tend to get sweaty even on short rides.

    Why would you wear panties under shorts? Is it a modesty issue? The shorts are designed to be modest enough. I do have some older shorts that are getting thin ( so see through in the back) so I make sure I use those for spin class or under a pair or hiking shorts while mountain biking.

    I do have a friend who regular wears two pairs of bike shorts for both modesty and comfort. Try that instead.
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387
    Cari, geez! I'm not saying wearing panties is _better_, but going commando grosses me out. That's my reason. I don't not wear panties no matter what I'm wearing. But some people are comfortable that way. Good for them! (But I'm not wearing cotton panties under my bike shorts- I wear Patagonia technical fabric seamless ones. They're nice for sleeping in, too- no tugging them down!) Ooh, just the thought of all that "stuff," natural and man-made, getting on my lovely RS Flex chamois- eewww!! Not that Friction Zone doesn't soak through and make the saddle all shiny anyway...But you should err on the side of the general population, I think. But if you don't, you're in good company!

    Nanci
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    Nanci... I hear where you are coming from but I can't imagine any of my woman juices getting through the chamois... Lordy I would have to be aflooding!!!

    My friends and I do joke about the fact if stuff does get through it just keeps the saddle nice and lubricated and better still keeps others off my bike. Can't imagine sitting on some other person juice. Gross!
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    Undies under bike shorts give some folks I've ridden behind some really unflattering panty-lines.

    I've worn UnderArmor compression shorts under my bike shorts. It was pretty comfy, kept stuff fairly clean, and no pantylines.

    But I generally prefer to go commando in my Terry commuter skort and Ibex capris. I have two very old pairs of plain bike shorts, and they have become so large on me that I don't wear them anymore. Save 'em for laundry emergencies now.

    I like my Terry skort so much that I'll probably buy another one instead of a pair of shorts. (and how long can a girl go with just 2 things to bike in? gotta shop!)
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387
    KY, you know what's worse than panty lines- too-see-through shorts so you have to look at someone's crack and shiny pink cheeks for miles!! Especially if they are wearing light blue or gray shorts!!
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Pocono Mountains, PA
    Posts
    56
    ok warning TMI in my next Question..look awaya now if you don't want to see it..

    ok what do you do when it's that time of the month? minipad on Chamois? i really don't know enough about all this ..I am an active type of person, i see no reason to stop riding for one week a month, so what are my choices?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Nanci
    KY, you know what's worse than panty lines- too-see-through shorts so you have to look at someone's crack and shiny pink cheeks for miles!! Especially if they are wearing light blue or gray shorts!!
    Nanci - funny story about that. Was mountain biking with my best friend - a guy. I asked him to take a photo of me going down this trail. He used my camera and when I got home I put the photo on the computer to look at it and to my surprise, all I was saw were two big shiny pink cheeks and what appeared to be, but lordy I'm hoping was not, my crack. In my defense I was wearing a really old paid of shorts that day. I asked my friend if he had noticed the rear view and he said "yes" and was one reason why he was giggling when he took the photo. He knew I would discover when I got home what he was watching all during our ride.

    I have since asked another friend (a woman) to photo my behind wearing newer shorts and thankfully that lovely pinkness does not show through but now, I will always be checking!!!
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by Nanci
    Cari, geez! I'm not saying wearing panties is _better_, but going commando grosses me out. That's my reason. I don't not wear panties no matter what I'm wearing. But some people are comfortable that way. Good for them! (But I'm not wearing cotton panties under my bike shorts- I wear Patagonia technical fabric seamless ones. They're nice for sleeping in, too- no tugging them down!) Ooh, just the thought of all that "stuff," natural and man-made, getting on my lovely RS Flex chamois- eewww!! Not that Friction Zone doesn't soak through and make the saddle all shiny anyway...But you should err on the side of the general population, I think. But if you don't, you're in good company!

    Nanci
    Sorry Nanci, I didn't mean to single you out. I mentioned you specifically because I respect your opinion, and consider you to be a good example of an experienced rider who knows quite a bit about chamois and fabrics, but prefers to not go commando (as opposed to someone who wears panties under bike shorts because they don't know any better.)

    I wanted ColleenT to know that while most riders favor wearing bke shorts without panties, if she decides to wear them, there's a way to do it (i.e. technical fabrics instead of cotton) and that, as you said, she's in good company.

    Cari

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387
    You can single me out if you want, Cari- that was "geez" like I'm embarassed that you think I "know a thing or two." Although between the two of us there is hardly a knicker stone unturned...

    I do have one pair of shorts that feel better with no panties- the Trashy Cat Sunflower shorts- they are just _too_ sheer. But then I am very distracted by the whole commando feeling for quite a long time. I don't wear them very often.

    Nanci
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •