I'm still trying to figure out why the boob/baby pic would be offensive regardless of what magazine it is on. There is no nippage, in or out of the baby's mouth, and by today's standard, as long as nipples are not showing, boobs can be aired on public TV well before the kiddies bedtime. Forgive me if I offend anyone for saying this but it sounds like the whinings of bible thumpers to me (I live in the bible belt so I am subjected to this thought process regularly).

As for Brittney - she's used up, has killed her reputation, and her music is desperate. Apparently she had an opportunity to try and make herself over (the dyed hair and extensions; naked and preggers) in hoping it would be well received like it was for Demi (altho I'm not well receiving). Besides that, the target market for the magazine shes on is more open to suggestive positioning and less likly to whine about "nudity". The mommy magazine's market is definately more of a "reserved" type (IMHO).

Brittney's just a wanna-be. Whether its Madonna or Demi, I still can't stand her.