Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    3,063
    Quote Originally Posted by SadieKate
    One thing though is that it seems to over estimate the total climbing. I had a very short ride that came out high but I finally put it to the test this last weekend with a longer route. Routeslip said 4,134 ft for the route below but my Polar said 3,395. Pretty significant variance.
    The way routeslip works is that every time you add it point it determines its altitude and then compares it to the last point looking for a gain. Since it doesn't know anything about what happened inbetween these points it should underestimate both climbing and distance. I don't have any way to check my real climbing but I know my actual miles are always higher than what routeslip says. These underestimates should be greater for routes with many short altitude changes as compared to routes with long sustained climbs since your point picking will rarely hit the actual peaks.

    Regardless of underestimates, if you do similar point picking (distance between points) for two routes you should get results that can be compared relatively.
    I'd rather be swimming...biking...running...and eating cheesecake...
    --===--

    2008 Cervelo P2C Tri bike
    2011 Trek Madone 5.5/Cobb V-Flow Max
    2007 Jamis Coda/Terry Liberator
    2011 Trek Mamba 29er

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    I wonder if it has to do with the number of way points you pick. Since routeslip doesn't snap to the roads, I have to put in a lot of points for winding rural roads. This may be why I get the consistent overestimates.

    I'm doing a longer version of the above route tomorrow. We'll see what happens.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Is it any wonder you don't know what to list as actual elevation?
    Check out these two routes. I've ridden both. In actuality, Around the Mountain (ATM) has less climbing than the Dam Corners Route (DC) because the routes are the same except for one extra climb on the later. Veronica recorded from her Polar that ATM (routeslip created by someone else) had 2,720' climbing. Routeslip calculated 3,663'. The DC route with my newly added climb of Cantelow is 3,457' as recorded by my Ciclosport, but routeslip says 2,899'.

    I'd say take the climbing on any of these mapping tools as "guidelines only."

    http://www.routeslip.com/routelist.p...20Corner,%20CA
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •