I don't know the answer to this any more than the rest of you. It is sad. And disappointing. And scary for FL, and any of the other cyclists that just might be clean.
The one thing I do know, though, is that I wouldn't listen to Greg Lemond about any of it... to hear him talk, he's the only cyclist that doesn't (didn't) dope.
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 15 of 53
Thread: Floyd-Results are back
Hybrid View
-
08-05-2006, 06:50 AM #1
Penguin runner
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Central Virginia
- Posts
- 471
"The bicycle was the first machine to redefine successfully the notion of what is feminine. The bicycle came to symbolize something very precious to women - their independence."—Sally Fox
-
08-05-2006, 07:17 AM #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Suburb of ATL
- Posts
- 132
I agree with the biochemist! I have used mas spec lots and know that it is extremely sensitive and the results are what they are. Go ahead with the "contamination" arguments
.
Has Floyd never been tested in another race before? If he had high testosterone levels naturally (even if it's just during a race, dehydration, etc.) then the elevated levels would be there during another race. He's a nice guy, he wanted to win, he thought he could possibly flush it out with all that water he was drinking the next day and no one would be the wiser. Got caught. Basically it doesn't matter what any of us think because it is up to the UCI and/or the courts.
Reply With Quote
