Anyone ever swapped a touring bike for a 'cross bike? Do you prefer it?
Two years ago I bought a touring bike because I'd commuted on one for 23 years in my previous city and it seemed like a practical choice. That previous bike was kind of unusual in that it had 26" wheels and a fairly short wheelbase. It eventually got a bit whippy and I had more and more trouble finding freewheels for it, so I sold it before we moved.
The present touring bike is a bit more sluggish and heavy feeling, although I don't think it actually weighs any more than the old one did. My husband is enthusiastic about his Ridley Crossbow and keeps telling me I should get a 'cross bike instead. Is it really all that much different? I know the wheelbases are a little shorter and they tend to be a little lighter, but I'm wondering if I'll notice that much when I'm loaded up to ride to the pool with office clothes, lunch, swim gear, lock, etc on the rear rack. If I could get one just like his I'd seriously consider it, but the one dealer in town that was selling Ridley no longer does and when I picked up a Cannondale CaadX in their shop I was surprised at how heavy it seemed.