Quote Originally Posted by OakLeaf View Post
Well, I can't find the most recent couple of stories that DH and I were just talking about last week, but here are a few:

https://www.pcworld.com/article/2297...is_creepy.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...rivacy-germany
http://gizmodo.com/5831119/police-us...ts-in-uk-riots
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug...ition-20110821


And EPIC's somewhat dated but more general page: https://epic.org/privacy/facerecognition/

Basically, there's one general principle that I've referenced before: if you're receiving something from a for-profit business and you're not paying for it, you are the product being sold. It's all well and good that these things are amusing, but that they're amusing isn't why the companies give them to you for free.
well, I read the Guardian, Gizmodo, and Epic articles and don't see what you are talking about. None of these indicate that this site, or any others, are using these uploaded faces for anything. Facebook tried to apparently - but for what I'm not quite sure, to pull more people in I guess.
They indicate people are afraid someone might.