
Originally Posted by
jobob
I think that depends in part on how the elevation gain is distributed. I did a near-century this past weekend with about 6300 ft of climbing, but about 4000 ft was in the first 35 miles. I was a bit whupped for the rest of the ride.
But yes, if the climbing is somewhat spred out, I agree with you.
Yep, distribution really matters to me, too. I can climb a 5% grade all day long, if it is a sustained climb.
But, up down, up down, up down tires me out WAY faster, especially if the hills get up into the teen%s.
And, for me, doing my ab & lower back work VERY routinely has made a huge differenc in my long distance comfort on the bike.
"The best rides are the ones where you bite off much more than you can chew, and live through it." ~ Doug Bradbury