Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32

    WSD or not. What's a short girl to do???

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I'll start by saying that I'm not quite 5'2" and had a horrible experience with a bike shop and the way too small, but very nice, bike they sold me earlier this month. I'm in the process of buying a new bike and dang, I want a good fit this time.

    I went to two shops today at the recommendation of one of the captains of the local team. At the first shop, the guy measured my inseams but refused to give me a specific frame size since he
    insisted it would vary from brand to brand. He showed me a very sweet
    looking Litespeed C3 size small (2010 or 2009, wasn't sure)on sale for $1900 from $3000. He told me if he changed the components to 105 (it comes with Ultegra) the price would come down to $1400 (closer to my budget). Like I said, it's a sweet bike but it's not women specific design. He says it doesn't matter because the the stem can be changed to a shorter or longer one as I need it. He also told me he'd see if he could find me a close out from the manufacturers and that they'd give me up to a month and a half to save for the difference between my today budget and the price of the bike.

    At the second store, the guy measured me thoroughly and concluded I take a 47 or 48cm frame. Again, he had very few things in my budget and one of the was out right away since I know I don't like it. He showed me 2011 Cannondale Synapse 6 womens that retails for $1800 but with the discount card I'd pay just over $1500.

    There was very little else in that price range. He also told me that
    because of my height, I shouldn't even consider non women specific design
    bikes. That it was OK to add an inch here or take an inch off there but
    that a bike shouldn't have to be rigged to fit correctly and that's
    exactly what would have to happen with a mens bike, even if it's 47 or 48cm
    bike.

    With that conflicting advice about women specific vs not, I don't know
    what to do. The Litespeed bike is a better bike by far but that would
    mean nothing if it wasn't the right fit. I swear, choosing a husband was
    easier!

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    It depends on how you're proportioned. WSD bikes are designed for those with long legs and a short torso. If you're evenly proportioned, then a unisex frame is probably a better bet.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    I think I'm fairly evenly proportioned. I just looked at the measurements of both bikes and the difference in the top tube is only 1.5cm.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Take both for test rides and see which one feels better. 1.5 cm can make a difference.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    I can ride the Cannondale but not the Litespeed, the seat post would have to be cut.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlie View Post
    Take both for test rides and see which one feels better. 1.5 cm can make a difference.
    This.

    I, personally, try to not get too fixated on the WSD label. Look at the geometry specs themselves. I have a WSD bike that doesn't really fit the standard for WSD bikes of other brands, so the label itself tells you little.

    What's your inseam? While reach is really important, the standover height of some unisex bikes might be your limiting factor. It was for me. I'm 5'4, but have the legs of somebody who's 5'2. In the very least, it helped me figure out what bikes wouldn't work.

    Also, what was too small about the bike you got earlier this month? Can you use the specs for that bike to guide you in looking at the specs for other bikes?
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    The bike I had before was 40cm. I was too scrunched up the entire time and no talk about going in the drops! It lasted all of 3 weeks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,897
    FWIW, my old bike is a 54 cm Trek traditional/men's frame. My new bike is a 54 cm Trek WSD frame. The difference in fit and comfort is huge.

    I had the shortest stem possible on the old bike but I was still hunching over and reaching too far in order to reach the hoods. On the WSD bike, I am able to reach the hoods while keeping my shoulders back and my back flat.

    I thought the old bike was okay, not perfect but I could deal with it. Until I tried the WSD frame and realized the different geometry made a big difference. The WSD frame also has a smaller handlebar that is better suited to my hands.

    I am 5'7" and I thought I didn't need a WSD bike because I have broad shoulders, long arms and what I thought was a long enough torso. I was wrong.

    - Gray 2010 carbon WSD road bike, Rivet Independence saddle
    - Red hardtail 26" aluminum mountain bike, Bontrager Evoke WSD saddle
    - Royal blue 2018 aluminum gravel bike, Rivet Pearl saddle

    Gone but not forgotten:
    - Silver 2003 aluminum road bike
    - Two awesome worn out Juliana saddles

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    JuneHawk!!! So good to see you!!!!

    I'm the same height as NYbiker, but with the exact opposite bike fit: WSD are instruments of misery to me, and regular geometry fit fabulously.

    Height alone is never a reason to recommend WSD. A short woman could fit better on WSD (like NYbiker) and another woman the same height might fit better on a regular fit (like me).

    Trek420 is a bit shorter than you, and she has had some fine rides on regular fit bikes.

    Ride lots of bikes, WSD and regular, ride ones you aren't even considering buying (like a Surly or Kona) ride a couple different sizes in each model. Take a couple weeks of just test rides to get a feel for the geometry your body works best with. Take lots of notes about what feels right and what feels wrong with each bike. A good sales clerk who wants you to get a bike that fits will pay more attention to your notes than to which bikes he needs to move off the sale floor that day.

    Did the shop that sold you the 40cm (!!??!!? for someone 5 foot 2!?!?!!?) take it back?
    Last edited by KnottedYet; 10-26-2010 at 11:30 AM.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,698
    I would ask the shop to find a shorter seat post that will fit the Litespeed....you shouldn't be expected to buy it without riding it.

    I agree with your shop guy that sizes can fluctuate somewhat between brands and models. See if he'll give you a range to consider.

    As for WSD: I'm 5'4" with long legs and a short torso. By all accounts I should be the ideal WSD rider. But I have a preference for non-WSD bikes....go figure. I do keep an eye on things like handlebar width and brake and shift lever reach though. Ultimately, it's an individual decision, not some magic formula.

    Good luck!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by KnottedYet View Post
    JuneHawk!!! So good to see you!!!!

    I'm the same height as NYbiker, but with the exact opposite bike fit: WSD are instruments of misery to me, and regular geometry fit fabulously.

    Height alone is never a reason to recommend WSD. A short woman could fit better on WSD (like NYbiker) and another woman the same height might fit better on a regular fit.

    Trek420 is a bit shorter than you, and she has had some fine rides on regular fit bikes.

    Ride lots of bikes, ride ones you aren't even considering buying (like a Surly) ride a couple different sizes in each model. Take a couple weeks of just test rides to get a feel for the geometry your body works best with.

    Did the shop that sold you the 40cm (!!??!!? for someone 5 foot 2!?!?!!?) take it back?
    Yes, yes and yes.

    Not being rude, just curious, you seem to know me from somewhere. Where? Do tell!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    I'm one of the folks on Bike Forum who recommended you come try Team Estrogen! I'm glad you did!
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    Ah, thanks! LOL.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    40 cm???? OMG; no wonder it didn't fit.

    Ride the Cannondale and try to extrapolate from there. If you feel scrunched, then the Litespeed might work. If you feel stretched out on the Cannondale or just about right, then the Litespeed's TT is likely too long for you.

    And don't let the shops force you into deciding between just these two bikes. Pour over enough specs, and you'll get some feel for whether other manufacturers will work for you. I cast a very wide net before deciding on my Bianchi. As for certain selling points of WSD bikes, like narrower handlebars, talk to the shop about making swaps if necessary to make a unisex bike work.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West MI
    Posts
    4,259
    June, I am only about 1.5" taller than you and ride a Cdale Synapse 5, WSD. In hind sight I now realize I would have fit better on a men's/unisex frame, since I have squatty legs. But the WSD bike has shorter-reach shifters, which works better for my smallish hands.

    I am starting to shop for my next ride. I will almost certainly stick with Cannondale, since it's the primary brand our shop carries, without spending a ton more on a "niche" brand or custom. This time around I am looking at the same size frame (48cm), but SRAM Rival components. SRAM's shifters are all adjustable reach, so that solves the hand-size issue.

    Any idea what your inseam (crotch to floor) is? You may do better on a WSD, but you may do well on a unisex bike, too, especially if you have a longer torso, like me.
    Kirsten
    run/bike log
    zoomylicious


    '11 Cannondale SuperSix 4 Rival
    '12 Salsa Mukluk 3
    '14 Seven Mudhoney S Ti/disc/Di2

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •