Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    9,324

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Quote Originally Posted by New Mexico MTB'
    And there you have it Doctorfrau, the eternal debate between hardtail and full suspension.
    It's not a debate over which is better system. Irulan rides a FS Kona. It's a question of what is best for a person new to mountain biking.

    Veronica
    Discipline is remembering what you want.


    TandemHearts.com

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    western Colorado
    Posts
    442
    I'm sort of a newbie to mtn biking. I got a Haro hardtail, aluminum frame, some LX parts on it. It was fine for what I do. Then I got a Gunnar Rockhound steel frame on ebay. My bike-mechanic BF moved all the parts off the Haro onto the Gunnar. The ride on the Gunnar is a huge difference. Maybe it's the geometry (these are both xs frame sizes) or the steel vs aluminum. The Gunnar climbs and decends so much better than the Haro, though I'm still a chicken.

    My BF recommended the hardtail. He has a Klein hardtail (he is jealous of my Gunnar ) (He wants a Gunnar now). He thinks a full suspension would be more maintainance.

    But a while back, before the Haro, I did try a Jamis Dakar full suspension bike and I liked it a lot.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •