Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: The Surly Thing

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conifer, CO
    Posts
    72

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Quote Originally Posted by uforgot View Post
    Also, on the Surly forum there is always a lot of discussion about how some people get them too big.
    I have searched but I have never found that forum. Can you post a link? (If that is allowed in this forum) Or give me some direction on where that forum is?

    -Sue

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,708
    Quote Originally Posted by SadieKate View Post
    Um, are you telling me this or who? I know the BB height on a cross bike is higher. I was wondering what the BB height has to do with the top tube length, not the seat tube length, on a cyclocross bike. And I was right - nothing. At least no more than any good bike builder would plan out when designing any bike - road, mtb, or whatever. You still need to pick a bike frame "size" by actual measurements, not by the decal stuck on the bike.

    If you read my previous post, you'd see I have a road bike and a cross bike from the same builder in the same size with the same top tube length. But Surly doesn't design this way. Therefore, PscyclePath's comment about a smaller size only applies to Surly and bikes from builders who design similarly - not to all cross bikes.
    Oh my, no! Sorry if that came out of whack.

    I've looked at the Surley's before. Wishing it would fit me. And I know even in the smallest size, the TT is too long in design.

    I was just thinking about what a challenge it is to find smaller bikes stock that actually fit right. Before I found your post, I was coming back to post this thread link.

    Some helpful discussion to the OP on geometry from the cyclecross section of this board....
    http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=27134

    EDIT
    This is a good thread too...
    http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=28565

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,708
    More $ than a Surly, but she sure is pretty...
    http://www.lunacycles.com/store.html
    (and lord help me, pretty much fits me--about same as my mtb--and erie *same* color--twins in the stable, hmm--dunno about that--but for the sale price... ahh, I digress)

    And then, there is...(mo $ too than Surly *sigh*)...
    http://www.terrybicycles.com/cycling_savvy/valcross

    Kinda interesting blog on cross and smallness...
    http://www.kerry-litka.com/main/word...008/10/page/3/
    Last edited by Miranda; 03-31-2009 at 03:42 PM.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    106
    Quote Originally Posted by canonsue View Post
    I see that Specialize gives 515mm as TT, but I don't see anything about a TT (effec) like the Surly. I just assumed that it would also be about 10-12mm additional.
    It is possible that Specialized bike has the horizontal top tube. Then its effective TT is the same as TT. (from what I see, it looks like that).

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Belle, Mo.
    Posts
    1,778
    Quote Originally Posted by canonsue View Post
    I have searched but I have never found that forum. Can you post a link? (If that is allowed in this forum) Or give me some direction on where that forum is?

    -Sue
    Here ya go.

    http://groups.google.com/group/SurlyLHT
    Claudia

    2009 Trek 7.6fx
    2013 Jamis Satellite
    2014 Terry Burlington

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conifer, CO
    Posts
    72

    Did the Surly Thing

    Well, I did the Surly thing but purchased the Long Haul Trucker (42cm) instead of the Crosscheck. I wanted a bike that I could ride on dirt roads and flat single track as well as pavement. This bike will do that. And for a short woman, it looks like the fit will be much more comfortable. I am not crazy about the smaller 26" wheels but it does make the smaller bikes a much better fit and more stable.

    Thanks everyone for the help. I will introduce myself in the introduce yourself thread and stay around awhile.

    -Sue

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    106
    I think that's a good choice. Look forward to seeing your new bike.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •