Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    83

    Help me find a saddle, please!

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Hey, everyone!

    So I am convinced that my Fizik Vitesse CP is definitely not going to work for me. The lady bits get totally smooshed and rubbed. The farthest I've ridden is a little over 10 miles, and by the end pedaling was torture because of the pressure it put on the area.

    I sat on a yoga mat and the measurements I got were 120 mm point to point, and about 150 mm edge to edge.

    The Fizik saddle I'm using now has the following measurements: Length: 270mm. Width: 154mm I'm new to this, though and am not sure how the width measurement directly interacts with my measurement. I'm thinking the width of my current saddle is okay, just the way it interacts with my frontal area is all wrong.

    Doing Knot's wooden chair test, I think I would benefit from a cut-out.

    I was looking at the Specialized saddles (Ruby and Jett) which seem to come in 130, 143 and 155. Would I want to get one that covers edge to edge of the sit bones (150) or more point to point (130) or in between the two (143)? So confused! Any other saddles I should be looking at?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    You want start off looking at ones with a width that is your outside bone measurement (150mm) plus 1 or 2 cm wiggle room to each side.

    So a 170-190mm wide saddle.

    And you already know you want a cut-out.

    So there's half the work done!

    How about padding? Do you like lots, or little? Narrow nose or wide? T shaped or pear shaped? Curved top or flat?

    Hey, if you end up with the Terry "Rosie", could you post a review? I've been thinking that would be a good one to recommend to my patients. (it is too narrow for me and I don't like cut-outs, so I need to hear from someone who does!)
    Last edited by KnottedYet; 05-12-2008 at 02:32 PM.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,057
    Just a slight hijack...the Rosie's been on backorder. It was supposed to ship on May 1, but I'm still awaiting. Looks like Terry's estimate of May 1 was a little optimistic. I was hoping to try out the Rosie before I took the plunge and sent the B68 in for its Selle Anatomica upgrade. Apparently, cutting a hole it in doesn't void Wallingford's return policy, but I won't return it once I do the upgrade.

    RoadBunner--welcome to the land of needing a wider saddle with a cutout. The best I've found so far was the Selle SMP Lady Strike. A wonderful cutout and just enough width in the back for me, but pear shaped and a little wide in the nose. Many have problems with chafing. Trade offs.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    996
    I measure 147 center to center & do OK on a 155mm San Marco. Just keep trying them until you find the magic one
    Because not every fast cyclist is a toothpick...

    Brick House Blog

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    83
    Thank for the info, everyone. I'm leaning towards trying another in the 155 range. I was told by the LBS that something wider might push me forward onto areas I wouldn't be happy with.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Quote Originally Posted by RoadBunner View Post
    Thank for the info, everyone. I'm leaning towards trying another in the 155 range. I was told by the LBS that something wider might push me forward onto areas I wouldn't be happy with.
    For me, that has a lot to do with the shape of the saddle. My more T-shaped Specialized Lithia doesn't do that to me.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    exactly wider back part of the saddle isn't going to push you forward if it's got a t shape to it.
    like a brooks.
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    I never believe anything that LBS guys say about women's saddles.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    My sitbones measure 130mm c-to-c, a bit wider than yours, but I do fine on a Terry Butterfly (155 mm width). I rode that saddle for 9 days straight, averaging 62 miles daily, on a loaded tour, without any issues. I just ordered a Selle Italia Lady Gel Flo (160 mm) to replace a saddle I really liked the cutout on but which ended up being too narrow at 140 mm (I hadn't measured my sitbones when I got it) and caused/aggravated a bad saddle sore. Just a small increase in width can make a huge difference in where your "bones" are supported.

    From the sounds of it, I'd think you'd be fine on a 155-160mm saddle with a cutout. Your choices get a lot more limited if you go wider than that, and you may not need the extra width. It's worth trying this range first, I think. Some places will give you a refund if you're not happy -- Terry gives a 30-day comfort guarantee, I believe.

    Good luck!
    Emily
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    2,032
    SMP Strike!

    I am totally convinced of the principle. Am in the process to find the perfect model.
    Just rode 50 miles on the glider model, very very promising.
    It's a little secret you didn't know about us women. We're all closet Visigoths.

    2008 Roy Hinnen O2 - Selle SMP Glider
    2009 Cube Axial WLS - Selle SMP Glider
    2007 Gary Fisher HiFi Plus - Specialized Alias

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Specialized also has a 30-day return policy if you order from the website. They have several T-shaped saddles that come in 155 mm width.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    646
    Quote Originally Posted by KnottedYet View Post
    You want start off looking at ones with a width that is your outside bone measurement (150mm) plus 1 or 2 cm wiggle room to each side.
    My LBS used a Specialized measuring device thingy Now I'm wondering what my actual measurement was....They put me on a 130 Ariel and I like it so far (well, I guess it's not saying much as my stock saddle was Bontrager...:P). I'm very much more perched above my soft tissue

    I'm assuming those measuring devices factor in the wiggle room? The guy who measured me says you go by the color code from center to center.

    Are saddles a bit like bike sizes in that most people can fit 2 sizes but it's a matter of preference?
    Ana
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    2009 Lynskey R230
    Trek Mountain Track 850

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Ana View Post
    Are saddles a bit like bike sizes in that most people can fit 2 sizes but it's a matter of preference?
    Yup. There are a gazillion variables, but at least the measurements give you an idea of where to start.

    Kinda like shoes, in that you can measure your feet on one of the foot sizer thingies, but depending on the style and brand of shoe and the way you walk, the size shoe you buy could be different than the size the measurer gave you.

    So, I can be measured at a 8.5 shoe size, but end up happiest with a 9.0 shoe. (at least I have a point to start trying shoes at, and know that trying size 7.0 or size 10.5 would probably be a waste of my time) And someone else who also measured at a size 8.5 shoe could end up happier in a size 7.5.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    83
    I was looking at the SMP line, but they are so $$ and I'd like to give something a bit more wallet friendly a chance before taking the plunge.

    Later today I'm going to call around to see if any LBS has the Specialized saddles. Online return shipping could get pretty pricey after one or two times.

    BleeckerSt I am starting to believe what you said about the LBS guys. They actually took the butterfly that came with my bike off and swapped it for the Fizik. I would have liked to have given it a try since so many women seem to like the Butterfly model.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    83
    Okay, quick update...

    Called a LBS and was told they had both the 143 and 155 of the Jett on the shelves. I went down and talked to the LBS guy about the differences in the Jett, Lithia, and one Ariel. He had me sit on the butt-o-meter and told me I basically fell in between the 143 and 155. He said to go with the 155 if I did more riding on the hoods and to go with the 143 if I did more riding in the drops/aero. I told him right now I'm mainly on the hoods, but did have plans in the future to put aero bars on the bike. So he said to go with the 143 since technically the 143 fit and it would be better for leg movement in aero.

    Of course, the whole time I'm also thinking how everyone here said 155 minimum.

    I meandered back to the shelf and there wasn't even a 155 in the Jett there ! I figured I had driven all the way out there, and they did say I could return it "so long as I didn't ride a century on it and beat it up" so went ahead and got the 143.

    I just put it on the bike and am trying to redial in my fit measurements. Just in jeans it is DEFINITELY more comfortable on the soft tissue than the old Fizik. The Fizik gave me problems even after 6 or so miles so hopefully I can get out and ride on this one and see how it goes. It is definitely firmer in the back than the Fizik so I'll probably be sore there for a bit.

    Anyhow, hopefully I didn't make a huge mistake taking his advice, but figure it is reversible damage. I'll let you know how this goes.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •