Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    268

    B-68 Girls.. Favorite Chamois?

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I'm in the market for a pair of winter tights or bib, would prefer ones w/ a chamois so I don't have two waistbands to deal with. If you ride a Brooks B-68 or similar, what brands or chamois have you found to be wide enough to match the saddle?

    So far, an old pair of Pearl Izumi (ultrasensor?) shorts are the only ones that actually protect the sitbones.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,057
    Hey! It isn't just me!!!!! I thought I was somehow defective when I discovered that the chamois wasn't covering the sit bones. I'm not nuts!?!?!?! (or we both are )

    I can tell you what doesn't work for me....Terry T Shorts. I love the fabric and the length, but the chamois is too narrow and/or is placed into the short such that it doesn't cover (these were the shorts where I discovered the problem--80 miles into a century...ouch!). I tried a Louis Garneau and also found the chamois too narrow.

    The PI Attack (I think, not Ultrasensor--Attack has a wider chamois) has been my short of choice for the last 2 years. However, the fabric doesn't hold up as well as I want. I have a pair of Craft Master shorts that work. My complaint is that they are really tight in the legs.
    Last edited by Thorn; 10-25-2007 at 11:27 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    I have to admit that I don't have a Brooks saddle, but I did spend some time this summer trying out new shorts. The Shebeest Ultra D had a substantial amount of padding--too much for my taste--in the sit bone area. I ultimately settled on the Sugoi FS short, which also offers good padding in that area, but it's a little more "concentrated."

    I can't help you with your original question b/c none of my tights are padded, but I did see on TE that PI sells an Ultrasensor tight with the same chamois as the short. Sounds like they might work for you.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    I haven't found a chamois wide enough to fit my sits bones.

    I'm very sad the Ibex El Fito chamois doesn't fit, either, but I love my El Fito capris so much that I don't really care.

    My B67 (same top as the B68) is so comfy that I often ride without any chamois.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    I just noticed my first sitbone dents in my new B68 saddle- they are right where they SHOULD be , on either side of the back. My old B17 had sitbone dents "trying" to form right on the edges of the saddle, and that's really how I knew it wasn't wide enough for me- i was riding partly on the side edges.

    I find two styles of SheBeest chamois are truly wide enough for me-
    ONe: the SheBeest chamois that comes both on their SB Pedal pushers, and the SB Tech tights (long).
    and Two: the SB Ultra D shorts have a very nice wide pad that is great for long distances. Since my Brooks saddle has no padding at all, the Ultra D shorts don't seem like excess padding to me. They are in fact my most comfy chamois for any rides. Sometimes i wear them with long non-padded warm tights or knickers.

    By the way, the SB Tech tights are on sale right now here:
    http://www.sierratradingpost.com/p/,...For-Women.html
    I have them and they are very warm and comfortable with a nice chamois.
    Last edited by BleeckerSt_Girl; 10-26-2007 at 04:23 AM.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    unless i am on a really long ride, I don't worry about Chamois either. Really long means more than 25 miles. I have a pair of Terry shorts that seem very nice. But i just don't have a problem, so i don't know if the Chamois is big enough or not.
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    186
    I'm a Jett girl, not a B-68, but I did have a big problem with finding a short that had a chamois that actually had the prime material under my bones. I started buying shorts, and then trying them on (with undies) while sitting on my bike, and feeling for the padding. I noticed that a lot of the chamois's are sort of pear shaped, and unfortunately for me, seemed to flare/widen just above and behind my sit bones. The chamois seemed wide enough, but placed too far back in the short, if you can picture that.

    For me, the short of all shorts, with the chamois of all chamois, is the Castelli Y-Pro Donna short. I've heard that they've been discontinued, but you can get them half price at backcountryoutlet if you're small or large. I've got 4 pair & even now, I actually have a yearning to order more, because I hate to think of trying to find a replacement. I think that they come in a tight, too.

    Good luck... the hunt for the right short consumed me this summer!
    Last edited by blueskies; 10-26-2007 at 12:37 PM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •