Infuriating article

[skinimini]

http://www.thenewsobserver.com/artic.../opinion01.prt

A friend posted this article on FB. I think this guy needs a reality check and at least a respectful response, although he shows absolutely no respect for those of us who travel on two wheels. Unfortunately, we all have run into just these type of ignorant, uninformed and dangerous types on the road.

Happy and safe cycling this holiday weekend.

[lovelygamer]

WOW, really? There are so many things wrong with that article. Seriously. People really are disgraceful in their respect for others anymore. I understand that not everyone knows the "three feet law" but doesn't basic human respect say you don't mow down a cyclist, no matter what kind of mode of transportation they are using?

[Tri Girl]

"I only noticed the headline because it was the biggest on the page. I did not bother to read the story because it had nothing to do with anything that interests me. I stopped riding a bicycle when I was a teenager and there are enough local challenges looming that big-city battles can be ignored....

If bicyclists demand their place on the asphalt, they must be prepared to suffer the consequences. Like the motorcyclist who chooses to ride without a helmet, or the driver who does not wear a seat belt, they must accept a certain amount of responsibility for their actions and the consequences of those actions."


Ummm...wow. First, he admitted he didn't even read the article that talked about sharing the road. I agree that we must accept a certain amount of responsibility, but we cannot accept (or should not) accept it all. Had it been an Amish person traveling by horse and buggy, should they (who do not reach the speeds that bicycles do) accept being run off the road and killed with no consequences?

I don't even know where to start with this. I'm not good with words, or I would respond to him.
Ignorant people suck. And most of them will never change their minds because they are...well, ignorant.

[Antaresia]

oooo, maybe if get bored on the weekend I'll send him a reply. His e-mail is at the bottom, glenn@thenewsobserver.com

What an inconsiderate weasel. If someone is too incompetent to drive a car without hitting anyone, the problem isn't with the person they hit...

reminds me a classmmate of mine, a long time ago. Every once in a while you'd hear him yell "stupid computer!", no matter what computer he was on. You'd think after a while he'd realize it's not the computer....

[pll]

If you write, you should write to the publication with the intent of getting the letter published. Glenn Harbison, publisher, is, evidently, a caveman. Point him to the Georgia code (http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/gacode/Default.asp).

For example, § 40-6-291 part (b) states that "any person operating a bicycle may ride upon a paved shoulder; provided, however, that such person shall not be required to ride upon a paved shoulder."

Unless riding a bike on Highway 5 near Blue Ridge is forbidden, the cyclist he encountered had a right to be there. The only aspect in which he is right, is that camouflage is the not wisest choice of clothing to be visible.

ETA: Better to send the letter to the "letters to the editor" address: letters@thenewsobserver.com

[Koronin]

Unfortunately there are those kinds everywhere even in tourist beach towns where bicycle rentals are one of the largest businesses in the area.

[Mr. Bloom]

My response to him. I'll let you know if I hear back...

Sir,

Like you, I drive cars. Unlike you, I ride bikes.

Like you, I have opinions. Unlike you, mine are rooted in an understanding of the law and a sense of common responsibility.

In response to a few comments you expressed:
- "Suddenly, out of nowhere, there was a guy riding a bicycle": Sir, the bicycle was already there. It was you, the faster vehicle, that came out of nowhere. IF THE BICYCLE WAS A SURPRISE TO YOU, YOU WERE FOLLOWING THE OTHER TRAFFIC TOO CLOSELY AND GOING TOO FAST. Your own words convict you!

- "The bicyclist was on the traffic side of the white line. He was in the way.": Yes sir, that's where he belongs according to Georgia Code 40-6-294. The shoulder is not a roadway; it is not maintained the same way. The bike was in the place proven safest. Your concern seems to be more rooted in a practice of inattentive driving habits.

- "Highways were built to carry motorists at high rates of speed.". Really? Check your history: the League of American Bicyclists was FOUNDED 9 YEARS BEFORE THE FIRST CAR WAS INVENTED (probably 30 years before the first car arrived in Georgia) to lobby for good and safe roads accessible to all. MY TAX DOLLARS support the maintenance of those roads too!

- "Innocent motorists stand to pay a life-long price.". Sir, you were driving a 4,000 pound truck - a dangerous weapon! *If you do not drive conservatively and alertly, you are ANYTHING BUT INNOCENT! *If you injure someone, the responsibility is yours.

In short, while I respect your opinion, the laws, history, and your own words contradict your position.

Sincerely,
Xxxxxxxxxxxx