Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    20

    wsd Trek X-caliber vs Specialized Jett comp/ 29ers

    One last bike shopping question, I've narrowed it down to these two 29ers.

    I'm one of those women who really does seem to do better in the WSD, long legs and shorter arms and torso. I do notice a nice fit with the Specialized WSD models, not sure if it would be as noticeable with the other brand-names. But anyway, here are my final two contenders.

    http://mountain-bikes.findthebest.co...d-Jett-Comp-29


    In some ways the X-cal seems better on paper, from the research I've done so far... and it does get good reviews... But the Specialized seems a favorite of women riders and you don't hear as much about them breaking and falling apart etc. Again I liked how the Specialized fit. I talked to Specialized shop guy today and he felt the Jett Comp 29 was no slouch (this model was called the Myka HT Expert 29er in 2011) , his main suggestion for the Jett was to get some really light tubeless wheels to knock a couple pounds off the weight and give better traction etc. I was put off by hearing that there were a lot of frame breakage problems with the x-cal, as well as other things breaking and snapping after not much use on them, don't know what to make of it. Seems some people still really love them.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    5
    I think the breakage issue is on older x-cals. At least, I hope so, since I have one

    I have a 2011 X-cal. Only had it a couple of months, but I'm happy with it. I really wanted a Stumpjumper 29r, but we got a great closeout deal on the x-cals and dh was able to pick one up as well. Basically got two x-cals for the price of 1 Stumpy.

    A friend of mine likes her Myka expert. I have a couple of specialized bikes that have served me well. I don't think you'd go wrong with either brand.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,942
    I don't know how tall you are, but the 15.5 and 17.5 X-caliber WSD are IDENTICAL to the men's/unisex X-caliber (check out the specs on the trek website). Except for the color. Maybe the 14.5 in frame is designed differently?

    Anyway, if you are someone who usually needs WSD because of proportions, I would make sure you got a really good trial ride on that one before commiting. I think it's a wonderful bike, and I almost got one, but I can't ride most WSD bikes.

    "I never met a donut I didn't like" - Dave Wiens

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    20
    Thanks for your input so far, you guys.

    I just ordered the Jett. Good point about the frames being the same on the Trek wsd and unisex bikes, that's one of the first things the Trek dealer told me which had me hesitating to get the X-cal, because as tall as I am (5 7", not super tall but not short), I did feel like I was swimming around in my BF's 17.5 Trek, felt a serious lack of control and confidence in how I fit in that frame even though I think the Cobia is a nice ride.

    My BF and I are both pretty athletic and want to be able to take this new biking idea past just light recreational, so I was a little worried that the Jett might be just a slightly dolled up low-end super basic entry-level bike that I won't be able to get some nice performance out of (if we get more serious in our aspirations). I realize you can get much more expensive bikes but $1,350 for me is not cheap. After scouring the net for reviews ( I mostly had to look up last year's model, the Expert), it's getting some nice nods~ while not 'race-ready' (probably due to weight~ 30 pds~ and a frame that is not geared towards a more aggressive riding position?), the female pro racers who tested it felt it fit them well, handled nicely and they enjoyed the ride.

    I'm too amateur to go buying myself the $2,900 Specialized fate and really justify it to myself even if I could afford it, so I guess I'll be happy with my nice entry level Jett. I think I may go ahead and replace the tires right away, I asked our Specialized shop guy what I would want to do to increase performance on it, his biggest suggestion was trading out the original tires for much lighter tubeless tires; this would lighten the weight on the bike (by 2 + pounds!) and make climbing hills much easier... plus a slightly knobbier, wider yet lightweight tire would give more traction. That was one of the only cons mentioned in the reviews, the Jett goes up hills great but the big wheels are a little sluggish starting up a hill. My bike shop guy was saying all that extra weight on a rotating wheel really does make a huge impact on your handling experience. I had read a pro racer-gal's review where her number one suggestion on the 29ers was to replace the wheels with the lighter ones asap, so that advice seemed solid. We already upgraded the chain for $25, he said would make the shifting nicer and take off a little weight.

    Anyway, thanks again!
    Last edited by countrygirl; 05-10-2012 at 06:18 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    While I definitely think you should focus on fit when selecting a mountain bike, I tend to think you're overthinking the rest of it. You gotta start somewhere, and the Jett is a perfectly nice bike, as is the X-Cal. It will more than you get you started in the sport. I understand the appeal of higher end bikes, but don't lose sight of the fact that you don't have to buy high end to ride and to ride well. Get the bike and ride it. I'd add that from my own experience as a relatively new mountain biker, I tend to think that taking a clinic or some lessons will help you ride better far more than getting a higher end bike will.

    I really urge you to hold off on swapping out anything for now. Would you notice the difference with lighter wheels? Sure, but you'll be in a much better position to figure out what you want if you ride the bike for a time first. Certain things on the bike are wear items, so upgrading from the get-go doesn't make sense. Just let them wear out. As for wheels, I generally think they're a good first upgrade, but I wouldn't put any money into a bike until you're really sure you like it and are sure what kind of riding you do on what kind of trails.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    20
    Excellent points Indysteel, thanks. Yes I tend to over think EVERYthing, lol. I'm satisfied with my choice this time based on the fit in my test rides. The only advantage to switching out the tires right away is I get a big discount, if I wait I have to pay and extra $150 when the time comes. But you're right, for my purposes I probably will be fine with the tires the Jett comes with. I'm going to be riding with a bunch of people on 26ers and was just thinking that if the lighter tires help you get up the hill faster (the one sticking point of this 29er is supposed sluggish starting up hills), changing the tires out would help me keep up. Anyway, yes I am way over-thinking, maybe time to just drop it for now and figure out things as I ride and get accustomed etc.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •