
Originally Posted by
hikeandbike
Thank you for your replies. Which would be better for a road bike-lower
handlebar position. Is the cut out needed. I'm leaning more towards the B68.
The B68, while the only saddle I found that is wide enough for me, wasn't really designed as a road bike saddle. That said, it is on all my road bikes.
As such, I found that the cutout was necessary since the top surface of the B68 has a slight dome shape. Prior to the B68 Imperial, I sent my B68's to Selle Anatomica's factory to have the slot cut into them. With the slot, I can ride the B68 on a road bike with handle bars lower than the saddle.
Also realize that the B68, unlike the B17 has a very abrupt transition from the top of the saddle to the sides. The first few rides on a saddle may chafe the back of your leg. But, the wonderful thing about leather is that this is temporary and after a few rides that transition smooths out and you'll have a comfy saddle where you aren't sitting on the metal plates.
It may not be designed as such, but the B68 works fine on a road bike, drops and all.
2009 Waterford RS-14 S&S Couplers - Brooks B68-Anatomica - Traveller
2008 Waterford RS-33 - Brooks B68-Anatomica - Go Fast
2012 Waterford Commuter - Brooks B68-Anatomica - 3.5-Season/Commuter
2011 Surly Troll - Brooks B68 Imperial - Snow Beast