Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11

    Elevation question

    Hi y'all.

    I live in Santa Fe where there are several hills-- some tiny, some small, some medium... you get the drift.

    Im just wondering what should be "easy" in terms of elevation gain? How many feet climbed? Also, what about "medium" and "difficult"? Im trying to plan different rides on maymyride.com and the elevation thing has got me scratching my head because I'm not sure what ride I should start with and the progression hereafter. Im trying to improve my riding and would like to know more on this subject.

    Any help, much appreciated!

    -carrie

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Marin County CA
    Posts
    5,936
    How many feet climbed in what distance? 1000 feet in a mile can be challenging. 1000 feet in 10 miles, not so much. It's all relative. What distances are you riding?
    Sarah

    When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.


    2011 Volagi Liscio
    2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
    2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
    2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
    2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    589
    I would argue that feet climbed isn't really the main issue (other than at some point you are going to hit an endurance threshold and just get tired).

    Feet climbed per mile (ie: GRADE) is the main issue.

    I believe mapmyride will allow you to view an "elevation profile" with % grade (do this by clicking on "Show Elevation" in the "info and tools" box in the map window (right hand side)).

    It will map your ride out into average gradient chunks and is even nice enough to color code them to give an idea of difficulty.

    For instance attached is a screen cap of one of my long, but basically doable by anyone climbs. Maximum grade is 4% (and is marked in an orange color) which you definitely feel after an hour of climbing, but not what I'd classify as painfully hard.

    5-6-7% is where things can start getting pretty darn difficult if you aren't used to it and/or geared for it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Picture 1.jpg 
Views:	159 
Size:	78.1 KB 
ID:	11024  

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    I agree with Martian Destiny that it's the grade much more than the total elevation gain.

    I disagree that mapmyride is a good place to find it though. They use VERY wide contour lines that wind up smoothing out most of the climbs in the steepest (and IMO very tough) terrain.

    Ridewithgps.com
    approximates fairly well the elevation gain that I get from my Garmin.

    Best way to measure a ride for yourself is to get a computer with a barometric altimeter, or a riding partner who has one. There are some models without GPS that are pretty reasonably priced.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    589
    I would hope a free internet service is not as good in resolution as a $300-500 personal bike computer and GPS. (or without the GPS for what? $100 or so. That's still not especially cheap) What something like Mapmyride (and there are others) would do for you is give you a preview of a ride. A bike computer, better resolution aside, means you have to ride the course before you know what you are getting into, which is not always what you want.

    Mapmyride is still reasonably functional, serves a purpose, and it's free. But honestly I only used it in my post because the OP said she was using it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    It's true it's not "as good," but that wasn't my objection... mapmyride isn't even close.

    Actually, for that matter, GPS is extremely inaccurate on elevation. Many rather inexpensive computers have barometric altimeters. GPS post-correction is nice, but if you need to choose one or the other, choose barometric. Read the complaints (and the responses of the experienced users) on the Garmin forums concerning the elevation data from the GPS-only 310XT. Last week mine gave me over 900 feet of elevation gain on an 18-mile run in coastal Florida. Sure I had to cross the bridge twice, but...

    As an example comparing the two online sites I mentioned: the first day of this year's Columbus Fall Challenge, a notoriously tough ride.

    Mapmyride gives the maximum grade as 3% (!) and a total elevation gain of 3950 feet.

    Here's the same route (plus a couple of extra miles on the end) on ridewithgps. They list a total elevation gain of 8632 feet and a maximum grade of 20.6%.

    Anyone who's ridden that ride and/or mapped it with their own barometric altimeter - with or without GPS - will tell you that the ridewithgps data is very close to reality (although it still probably underestimates the total elevation gain by a few hundred feet).

    And it's all because of mapmyride's wide contour lines.

    That's all I'm saying. I like mapmyride, I use it all the time, I find it the easiest way to export .gpx files, but when I want to know approximate elevation data, I use ridewithgps.
    Last edited by OakLeaf; 04-12-2010 at 06:58 AM.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •