It's true it's not "as good," but that wasn't my objection... mapmyride isn't even close.
Actually, for that matter, GPS is extremely inaccurate on elevation. Many rather inexpensive computers have barometric altimeters. GPS post-correction is nice, but if you need to choose one or the other, choose barometric. Read the complaints (and the responses of the experienced users) on the Garmin forums concerning the elevation data from the GPS-only 310XT. Last week mine gave me over 900 feet of elevation gain on an 18-mile run in coastal Florida. Sure I had to cross the bridge twice, but...
As an example comparing the two online sites I mentioned: the first day of this year's Columbus Fall Challenge, a notoriously tough ride.
Mapmyride gives the maximum grade as 3% (!) and a total elevation gain of 3950 feet.
Here's the same route (plus a couple of extra miles on the end) on ridewithgps. They list a total elevation gain of 8632 feet and a maximum grade of 20.6%.
Anyone who's ridden that ride and/or mapped it with their own barometric altimeter - with or without GPS - will tell you that the ridewithgps data is very close to reality (although it still probably underestimates the total elevation gain by a few hundred feet).
And it's all because of mapmyride's wide contour lines.
That's all I'm saying. I like mapmyride, I use it all the time, I find it the easiest way to export .gpx files, but when I want to know approximate elevation data, I use ridewithgps.
Last edited by OakLeaf; 04-12-2010 at 06:58 AM.
Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler