Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    167

    going double to triple

    I currently have a Campagnolo 10 speed 39-53 (front) compact double with a 12-23 (rear). I am considering having my front crank swapped out with a 30-42-53 triple (front), maybe this one: http://www.niagaracycle.com/product_...ucts_id=405909

    This would be done strictly to help me out on some of the hills I am trying to conquer. I have gone to the Sheldon site and plugged in the numbers for gearing. But, I don't understand the information.

    Is there an easy answer as to whether I'd be gaining that much more in lower gearing? Would I easily notice it riding uphill or would it be more subtle?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    2,032
    uh, you would definitely notice something, considering what you currently have (53-39) is not a compact but a regular double.
    (no one except complete flatlanders and pros should be riding a reglar double... my most humble of opinions. Over here, we call it the "hero" crank, as in heroism=unnecessary silliness)

    this means you can already gain considerable climbing ease by solely swapping out the crank set to, say, a 50-34 (that's a compact), and save $ on the front derailler.


    Also, you can change out the cassette to up to a 13-29 with Campy. and that will help.
    Last edited by alpinerabbit; 09-06-2009 at 03:03 PM.
    It's a little secret you didn't know about us women. We're all closet Visigoths.

    2008 Roy Hinnen O2 - Selle SMP Glider
    2009 Cube Axial WLS - Selle SMP Glider
    2007 Gary Fisher HiFi Plus - Specialized Alias

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by alpinerabbit View Post
    ... gain considerable climbing ease by solely swapping out the crank set to, say, a 50-34 (that's a compact), and save $ on the front derailler.

    Also, you can change out the cassette to up to a 13-29 with Campy. and that will help.

    Wow, I had no idea. I was told it was a compact and not knowing the difference, just accepted it. Thanks! So your suggestion of a 50-34 is being noted. But, could I not also solely use the triple using the same derailler, as well as leaving the original cassette?
    Or-- was your added information regarding the 13-29 cassette give me the same effect I am seeking with the triple?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,609
    A 13-29 is a great option - I use that with my compact and can climb just about anything. If you switch to a Campy triple, you'll also need a new bottom bracket along with a new front derailleur. A compact is a great place to start, and since cassettes do wear out in time, next time, try the 13-29, or just do the swap now, since it might be time for a new cassette anyway.
    For 3 days, I get to part of a thousand other journeys.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    20
    Don.t forget you would have to change your shifter also.
    Veronika

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Quote Originally Posted by myjas View Post
    Don.t forget you would have to change your shifter also.
    Why?

    Most Campy shifters (not 11 speed) are both double and triple compatible.

    And Campy triples shift most excellently.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedal Wench View Post
    A 13-29 is a great option - I use that with my compact and can climb just about anything. If you switch to a Campy triple, you'll also need a new bottom bracket along with a new front derailleur. A compact is a great place to start, and since cassettes do wear out in time, next time, try the 13-29, or just do the swap now, since it might be time for a new cassette anyway.
    Thanks for the info! I am now looking up a 50-34 crank to buy. Please correct me if I am wrong-- I could swap out my current crank for the 50-34 AND swap out the cassette for the 13-29 and can keep all the other parts of old?

    I just noticed myjas comment regarding shifter... did you mean if I went with a triple?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,011
    yes, I believe that myjas means if you switch to the triple.

    I agree with the other posters. I don't recommend that you go to a triple with your current setup.

    (I actually don't recommend triples at all, but that opens a WHOLE nuther can of worms...I realize that some riding scenarios call for them but I don't feel that they shift as well...but this is coming from me who rides a regular double ("(no one except complete flatlanders and pros should be riding a reglar double... my most humble of opinions. Over here, we call it the "hero" crank, as in heroism=unnecessary silliness)") I ride a 53/39 - 12-27 on my road bike and 52/38 - 11-27 on my tri bike. Final thing is I don't know anything about Campy and what gearing the derailleurs will handle. you should check with your bike shop to be sure that the derailleurs will handle the gearing that you are talking about.

    When looking at Shelton's Gear calculator....

    currently you have 53/39 - 12-23. with 39-23 you have 3.3%

    if you only switched out the cassette from 12-23 to 12-27 you would go to 2.8% (recommended. easy and cheapest)

    if you switched the cassette to 13-29 your ratio would be 2.6% but i'm worried that you may need a new or adjusted rear derailleur. I could be totally wrong but you should check that out just to be sure)

    f you only switched out the double to the triple you would get (53/42/30 - 12-23) using 30 - 23 the ratio would be 2.6% (not recommended, probably have to change derailleurs, bottom brackets, shifters)

    50/34 - 12/27 the lower right hand box says 2.5%. That's the ratio that you have when your are using your little front ring (34)and your largest cog (27) (good option for best ratio, but will cost more than just changing cassette)

    and finally, if you went all out, 50/34 - 13-29 your ratio would be a mere 2.3 %

    Was that too much info?.....I was having way too much fun with that gear calculator.
    "Being retired from Biking...isn't that kinda like being retired from recess?" Stephen Colbert asked of Lance Armstrong

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •