Did you know the wings are real?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...fly-wings.html
Did you know the wings are real?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...fly-wings.html
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
I didn't. I don't know that I'd want to ride a bike like that. I'd be a little creeped out.
But I wonder if these people are offended at the millions of insects slaughtered every day because they're considered to be pests. I wonder if those acts would be called "horrific" and "bararic". Why do so many animal rights people only care about the pretty or cute animals?
They're surprised that this isn't what Lance stands for, but... is Lance vegetarian? Vegan? Is the seat on his bike leather?
Don't get me wrong. I couldn't stand fishing as a child not only because of the pain inflicted on the fish by the hook, but because I couldn't stand hurting and drowning the worms. (To be honest, though, I did do it because I enjoyed spending time with Dad.) I'm bothered by the butterflies stuck by pins for collections, and I'm bothered by people who beat snakes to death just because they don't like snakes. (My hypocrisy is that I'm OK eating fish/meat/fowl... so long as someone else does the killing.)
But back to my point: It's the hypocrisy in arguments like this that gets me. It's always about the cute and pretty creatures. Why? Would people be bothered if it was covered by the wings of flies? Maybe they would, but I'd be surprised.
Fall down six times, get up seven.
My Blog/Journal: Fat Athlete
I hadn't actually been keeping up with the bike painting honestly, but cool.
I don't see what the controversy is (other than PETA loves controversy and is completely off it's rocker). The butterflies are dead, likely dead of natural causes (the things don't live that long so it's not that hard to "farm" them and still allow them to live full natural lives), so what's the big deal? Now if it was known that he was killing the butterflies or worse, pulling the wings off live butterflies that would be different, but I didn't see any mention of either case in the articles.
I think his shark is awesome too (assuming, again that the shark wasn't killed for this purpose). Would "we" (collective we) be offended if the shark was an exhibit in a Natural History Museum instead of "art"?
Last edited by MartianDestiny; 07-29-2009 at 12:39 PM.
I agree with Martian - Butterflies, especially the ones that were "plastered" over the bike, are very common types, they only live for a couple weeks then they just die.
The collectors just collect the dead ones, or capture the good ones for a while, and wait until nature takes it's course. It does take a LOT of butterflies to find really good wings as they are fragile. However, putting it on a bike can raise eyebrows...there's the always "what ifs" - what if the butterflies were killed, what if they were still alive when the wings are plucked, etc etc.
No offense to Lance, but I find the bike a little too "girly". :-)
What are the other custom bikes that Lance rode?
The rest of the "Stages" bikes are here:
http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/stages/
If PETA would focus their time and resources on animals rights issues that actually mattered instead of creating inconsequential lightning rods, animals would be better off and the citizens of the world only half as irritated by PETA as they are now.
That said, damn, I love that bike. Wouldn't ride it, but it's a fascinating work of art. If it fetches the expected $1 million at auction this fall, then LIVESTRONG wins big.
If it's Damien Hirst, no one should be surprised that they are real butterfly wings. But as others have said--what's the big deal? I doubt very much that he was ripping them off live butterflies.
Sarah
I didn't know they were real and honestly, I think it's kind of gross, but whatever.
I'd like to know how all those butterfly-loving-PETA-supporting-vegans feel about the pesticides that make the veggies they eat possible? Hmmmm? And do they kill a mosquito if it's sucking on their arm? Or how about the ant crawling across their kitchen counter? And how will they ever live with themselves if they ever get stung by a honey bee? OMG - the horror of it all!![]()
My new non-farm blog: Finding Freedom
LOL! This reminded me of a show Verminators. A group of vegans lived in a house that was badly infected by rats. The best way to get the rats is to use the Alligator clamps or whatever they're called (I MUCH prefer fast kill over than liquid or glue traps...I always feel so bad if they have to struggle to die), anyways...the Vegans were so upset about it and they rather have them live trapped instead....that will take over a year, not accounting for more babies, etc.
So, they came with a compromise, the verminator has to become vegan for two weeks until all the rats were gone, and he can kill however he wants.
While there's pests every corner of the world, and I'm guilty of killing a few, but there are times when I see a spider making a beautiful web inside my home, I would just take it outside. We cannot save every single animal on this earth. It's the Circle of Life. (Gawd, I sound like a Disney movie, now what movie was that?)
The one thing that can be said about most PETA types is that they are nearly always consistent--they are going to eat veggies grown without pesticides, they are going to let that mosquito do it's business and get on it's way, and they will use humane traps to catch any bugs in their house. All of this I know from vegan/PETA people I've met, but I've never asked about the bee sting thing. I know they don't have a problem with a death that happens in the natural order of things, and I suspect that bee stings would fall under that category (although by the same token they'd go out of their way to not piss off a bee).
Sarah
If they care about the honeybees that are abused to pollinate many crops, what is there left to eat?
Sorry, but if you take veganism to it's 'logical' conclusion, it becomes completely untenable. And, yes, I think PETA is run by idiots. I don't understand why seemingly (I guess "seemingly" explains it) intelligent celebrities do ads for PETA. I wouldn't touch that stinking pile of an organization with a 10 foot pole.
Steps off soapbox...
Kinda like Critical Mass.
not sure what to think of the butterfly bike. Is it even worth discussing the merits.
Is it art? not sure
is it shock art? perhaps. but then again I'm not an artist and can't give any intelligble thought on the matter.
As for cruelty issue?
first of all, I'm not too keen on PETA. They lack few things but seem to make up for it in their determination to be heard, to make spectacle of themselves... If you do any life cycle analysis (LCA for short) and use PETA's argument, then we do not belong on this planet.
But back to the cruelty issue. Will the "art" undermine the efforts of endangered species act, animal rights, wildlife preservation or does it highlight the plight? I don't know.
Personally, I would call this thing shock art at best, equivalent to a photo art of crucifix swirrling in a toilet bowl. Something Ronnie blasted while in office.
bike is non-sequitor for me. yawnnnn....
Quite a bit left to eat--you can run a subsistence vegetarian farm that doesn't rely on "kept" bees.
I'm not a PETA member or a vegan or a vegetarian and I'm not going to spend a lot of time defending them (because in many ways I agree that they take things to extremes. How do they feel about antibiotics I always wonder?), but they ARE consistent.
Sarah