Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Edge of Colorado Plateau
    Posts
    701

    Anyone an Envronmental Health Scientist

    I have been looking into this field for a while. It uses all of my background as is outside, not in a building doing paperwork. I was a Biology major with minors in geology and chemistry.

    What is the good, the bad and the ugly about this career?

    Thankyou,
    Red Rock

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    528
    It's a via'ble field and often gets passed by.

    I started out in Environmental Analytical Chemist in the 1960's when everyone was trying to find alternatives to DDT pesticides.

    If you want to work in the labs in this field you'll be working with some rather ugly sample types: wastewater, pesticide and aromatic hydrocarbons in a varitey of sample types.

    If you care about the environment, it's a good field to feel like you are contributing to changes.

    It's not glamorous work and involves anal retentive details but if you have the mindset of an anaytical chemist, you'll be happy.

    Many government jobs are in this area.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Edge of Colorado Plateau
    Posts
    701
    I am currently in the hospital lab now and I am having problems with some of the minute details here. Would I have the same problems there? I have seen a job opening but it does not say much about the testing where it is done. It sounds like its mostly collection.

    Red Rock

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Phillipston, MA
    Posts
    445
    I've been an Environmental Scientist (not specifically a health scientist) since 1990. I started out as well as a chemical analyst in the Soil Characterization Lab at a university. Yes, there are some nasty samples out there. The lab I worked at was very underfunded and some of the lab broke OSHA standards such as good hood ventilation for aromatic hydrocarbon samples and such. I understand from several of my friends who have state jobs where budgets are slashed, that still can be commonplace. It sounds like you are in a lab environment but there are alternative routes, depending on your age, experience, etc that can take you away from lab/field work, and away from some of the nasty stuff if that's what you want. I went to work for an engineering environmental consulting firm and am still in the private sector where I more managed what the field and lab people did, and took their results and made sense of results as applicable to the project. Taking the data, and connecting dots along with all my requisite background was fun. I totally switched gears in 2000 and now do GIS. In my company though, we have many people who do risk analysis and risk management. All I'm saying, is there are alternatives but it sounds like you want to get out of the office or that you would stay with testing?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Edge of Colorado Plateau
    Posts
    701
    I guess I would not mind being outside again. Somehow it is in my bones. I guess that is why I ride and hike. I have not and try to detest paying money for a gym membership when I can be outside enjoying the sunshine etc.

    I did an internship through the Museum of Northern Arizona in Paleotology and totally loved it.

    Are these samples any worse than dealing with HIV and other human contracted dieseases that you find in the hospital?

    What about detail work and multitasking? How do these fit into this type of job?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,698
    I'm an ES, but my degree is in chemistry. It's a pretty broad field, and can mean a lot of different things. I got my start doing consulting work. My position was such that I spent a lot of time verifying data usability, managing electronic data, interfacing with labs, coordinating with field staff, and writing reports. Very little of my time was spent in the field. Most entry-level ESs in the private sector spend way more time in the field than I did, and can purge wells in their sleep.

    I was happy to leave the firm that I was working for and the private sctor in general. My experience with consulting was that you're working for the client and the bottom line, not necessarily what's best for the environment. Long hours, travel to who-knows-where, etc. My commute sucked too, but that can happen with any job.

    I now work in government, doing environmental compliance. There's a fair amount of field work, but the bulk of my job still has me in an office, writing letters, regulations, outreach and enforcement documents, making phone calls, etc. The best parts of my job: a) normal work hours (very little overtime or travel required- I get to be home with my family every night), b) self-managed workload- I manage my sites, and seek input from senior staff or management when I need it. No boss or client breathing down my neck. c) Helping people who truly need it. My clients are the citizens.

    The bad? Politics. Standing on a site in February when it's 10 degrees out, or August when it's 100 degrees out, but you've got to be there because it's your site. The eternal curse of government- never enough staff for the tasks that need to be done.

    It's definitely not glamorous. But, at the end of the day, I feel like I've made a difference to the citizens here, to their health and safety, and to our environment. And that keeps me going.

    EDIT: Yep- tons of detail work and multi-tasking. I constantly have multiple projects that are all equally serious.
    Last edited by Becky; 08-17-2008 at 12:18 PM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •