With gas prices nowadays, why is US rail travel still so inconvenient?

[Jolt]

Here's what brought this on: my family is going camping in upstate NY and I will be joining them for part of the time. It's about a four-hour drive from here, on a toll road most of the way to boot. Besides the cost, I just plain dislike driving long distances by myself--hard to stay awake so then I end up drinking a big iced coffee and often when I reach my destination everybody gets to deal with a spaz . So, I decided to look into Amtrak and see if that would be a possibility since I knew there was a train I could catch here that goes through Albany and thought there would possibly be a connecting train heading north, and also thought the cost would be comparable to driving. Well, the Lakeshore Limited (the one I'd get on to go to Albany) does intersect with a line that goes right where I need to go (Adirondack) but they each only run once a day and there is NO WAY to connect (Lakeshore Limited gets to Albany at 5:35 pm and Adirondack leaves Albany at 11:05 am...not gonna work!!). How stupid. If I could get where I needed to go, the cost would indeed be pretty comparable to driving (and it would be much nicer than driving). I wrote them an email on their website about these issues and we'll see what kind of response I get. It's just frustrating that the infrastructure is there (at least here in the Northeast), the price is reasonable, but the severely limited service makes traveling by train not feasible for most regional trips. You'd think with the current energy situation there would be some attention to improving this; I know for a fact that ridership has gone up lately (heard it on the news the other day). Ridership would increase even more if it were actually possible to make connections between lines.

[OakLeaf]

Wow, you can leave DURING THE DAY? You actually have great service...

I would have to drive three hours and make a connection at about 3 a.m.

[NoNo]

I'd use Amtrak more if their prices weren't so rediculous. They're never on time, and when I used to ride from DC to New Haven, they were usually jammed with people, sometimes forcing them to stand in the aisles! I take the commuter train from New Haven now, and my afternoon train is late every day because we have to wait for the ever-late Amtrak train to come through (they own the tracks, so they get priority). I wish there were an alternative, and I hope that the current situation forces someone to look into the problem.

[Jolt]

Wow, you can leave DURING THE DAY? You actually have great service...

I would have to drive three hours and make a connection at about 3 a.m.

If what we have here is "great service", that is pretty sad!! The only place where I would consider it "great service" is the Northeast Corridor line (Boston to VA). NoNo, that must be the one you're referring to with the ridiculous prices--they are rather high on that route. Some of the others in NE seem fairly reasonable, it's just that the schedules suck!! Your issue with Amtrak messing up your commuter train sounds like our issue here with CSX (freight company) messing up ours in and out of Worcester (and limiting service in and out of Worcester to boot)...it is a pain in the butt. Stuff like this sure isn't helping the energy situation--I think we should all write letters!

[bmccasland]

Because until this year, there hasn't been a high demand for passenger trains, or public transit in general - I think the last time mass transit was heavily used was prior to WW II. In the US the goal was a house in the suburbs and a car in the driveway, and many people achieved that. No middle class demand for mass transit - no more mass transit.

Young people are absolutely galled when I tell them that my parents used to put me on a bus to go visit my grandparents when I was in elementary school (back in the '60's). The bus driver had me and my brother sit right behind him, and wouldn't let us off until my grandfather came to get us. It was still fairly common for folks to ride buses, back in the day. (and now I'm going to slink off and look for more grey hairs...)

[OakLeaf]

Don't forget that demand and availability go hand in hand. I'm not sure what happened after WWII, but definitely in the 1970s, subsidies were yanked away from Amtrak (which had a different name then IIRC) and handed to highway building instead.

I would love to ride the train - have wanted to for decades. That's "demand" in my book. But I don't actually ride the train, so I'm not counted as statistical "demand." As I said, I don't ride the train because the trip would be three to four times as long as driving; still much more expensive when you count the sleeper car (lodging) rates for a trip that would involve zero or only one overnight in a car; involve sleep deprivation through late-night transfers even if I could sleep in a moving vehicle; and still involve six hours of driving.

[Geonz]

Why? Because the roads and automobile industry are what get the subsidies and support, and because Amtrak's been pretty poorly managed for a long time. Around here an issue is that the tracks are owned by freight train companies so that passenger trains have to wait. It's common for trains to be delayed for hours.
Our line from here to Chicago is pretty nice, though, for the same reasons the NE stuff is - there's the volume.
I'd like to see government support for mass transportation but that's not where the rich & powerful guys are.

[indigoiis]

You might want to look into the bus - Peter Pan/Greyhound/Bonanza.

[SadieKate]

Why? Because the roads and automobile industry are what get the subsidies and support, and because Amtrak's been pretty poorly managed for a long time. Around here an issue is that the tracks are owned by freight train companies so that passenger trains have to wait. It's common for trains to be delayed for hours.

That's pretty much true everywhere. Remember the railroad barons and the land deals? Those tracks are owned by the freight companies who don't give a sh1t about the quality of the tracks either. A load of furniture doesn't demand a smooth rail. I think Amtrak is acutally having to pitch in for maintenance when their fees to the freight companies should cover it.

I'm waiting for shippers to realize that rail can, in many circumstances, be a more cost efficient way to move freight rather than long haul truck.

[Jolt]

Young people are absolutely galled when I tell them that my parents used to put me on a bus to go visit my grandparents when I was in elementary school (back in the '60's). The bus driver had me and my brother sit right behind him, and wouldn't let us off until my grandfather came to get us. It was still fairly common for folks to ride buses, back in the day. (and now I'm going to slink off and look for more grey hairs...)

I looked into the Greyhound bus as well for this trip--you wouldn't believe the fare!! It was $125 for a nonrefundable ticket (round trip) and would still require somebody to drive 30 miles each way to pick me up. Odd, because usually the bus is a lot cheaper...

[sundial]

Wow, you can leave DURING THE DAY? You actually have great service...

I would have to drive three hours and make a connection at about 3 a.m.

Amtrak Texas Eagle arrives on schedule only 63% of the time! It's suppose to arrive at 1:30 a.m. here and usually arrives 3:00 a.m. or so and on one occasion it arrived 4:30 a.m.

[Tuckervill]

Here's what brought this on: my family is going camping in upstate NY and I will be joining them for part of the time. It's about a four-hour drive from here, on a toll road most of the way to boot. Besides the cost, I just plain dislike driving long distances by myself--hard to stay awake so then I end up drinking a big iced coffee and often when I reach my destination everybody gets to deal with a spaz . So, I decided to look into Amtrak and see if that would be a possibility since I knew there was a train I could catch here that goes through Albany and thought there would possibly be a connecting train heading north, and also thought the cost would be comparable to driving. Well, the Lakeshore Limited (the one I'd get on to go to Albany) does intersect with a line that goes right where I need to go (Adirondack) but they each only run once a day and there is NO WAY to connect (Lakeshore Limited gets to Albany at 5:35 pm and Adirondack leaves Albany at 11:05 am...not gonna work!!). How stupid. If I could get where I needed to go, the cost would indeed be pretty comparable to driving (and it would be much nicer than driving). I wrote them an email on their website about these issues and we'll see what kind of response I get. It's just frustrating that the infrastructure is there (at least here in the Northeast), the price is reasonable, but the severely limited service makes traveling by train not feasible for most regional trips. You'd think with the current energy situation there would be some attention to improving this; I know for a fact that ridership has gone up lately (heard it on the news the other day). Ridership would increase even more if it were actually possible to make connections between lines.

Well, I tell you--as late as Amtrak always is, you should get to Albany the day before and you'll probably have only a couple hours layover for the next day's train!

Karen