Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    399

    Elevation Question

    I am doing the Maine Lobster Ride and Roll next Saturday (July 26th). They have different routes that you can choose from and I have decided to go for the 50 mile route.

    On their website, they state, "According to one regular Lobster Rider with a GPS unit, the 50-mile route has a little over 2,000 feet of climbing while the full 100-mile route has about 5,250 feet of climbing."

    What exactly does this mean? Can you tell how hilly the route is by this statement? Does it mean that if I add up the elevation of all of the hills on the 50 mile route that they total 2,000 feet? Or do you subtract the lowest point of the ride from the highest point on the ride and that gives you 2,000 feet?

    Is a little over 2000 feet of climbing a lot over 50 miles?

    I'm definitely clueless... any help is appreciated.

    Lynette

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Marin County CA
    Posts
    5,936
    it means if you add up all of the hills on the course, the cumulative elevation gain is 2000 feet.

    2000 feet in 50 miles is very mild climbing.

    have fun!!
    Sarah

    When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.


    2011 Volagi Liscio
    2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
    2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
    2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
    2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,516
    Usually, it's the total elevation gain over the ride. So, you go up - and it adds to the number. You go down, it doesn't subtract. For 50 miles, I'd say that's middle of the road.

    CA
    Most days in life don't stand out, But life's about those days that will...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    3,063
    For myself I consider any ride that averages 40-50 feet of climbing/mile to be mildly challenging, anything over 50 to be challenging. Your ride is 40ft/mi. That falls into my mildy challenging range. YMMV.
    I'd rather be swimming...biking...running...and eating cheesecake...
    --===--

    2008 Cervelo P2C Tri bike
    2011 Trek Madone 5.5/Cobb V-Flow Max
    2007 Jamis Coda/Terry Liberator
    2011 Trek Mamba 29er

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Yeah, but if it's a GPS-only unit that measured the climbing, rather than a barometric altimeter measurement, the numbers are high. I think MDHillSlug's ft per mile comparison is a good guideline.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    399
    Thanks so much ladies!!

    It makes more sense now. I promise I will get back to you after the ride and let you know how it went.

    I like the idea of "mildly challenging."

    And I'm planning on having a blast, hilly or not!

    Lynette

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    399
    50 miles done! A really beautiful ride. I would highly recommend it.

    And it wasn't too hilly. Mildly challenging was a good description. Lots of hills, but none of them "killer hills."

    Now I will have a better idea of figuring out climbing grades for future rides.

    Thanks again,

    Lynette

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •