Which is your preference and why? What is the advantage to one over the other?
Which is your preference and why? What is the advantage to one over the other?
"Chisel praise in stone; write criticism in sand."
Centerpull have more clearance for wide tires and fenders, and have stronger braking power, but you have to be sure to use compatable brake levers. Side pull are easier to adjust. I have centerpull cantis on my touring bike and sidepulls on my racing bike. To use centerpull cantis, your bike has to have appropriate mounts, so I am not sure it is a choice.
What if the centerpulls aren't cantis? My mixte has Weinmann centerpulls that aren't cantis. Is there also more fender clearance then or are they just old style brakes that have given way to the newer sidepull?
Claudia
2009 Trek 7.6fx
2013 Jamis Satellite
2014 Terry Burlington
What if you don't know what cantis are?
![]()
"Chisel praise in stone; write criticism in sand."
Wikipedia is your friend.
Claudia
2009 Trek 7.6fx
2013 Jamis Satellite
2014 Terry Burlington
Better cantilever pics.
Claudia
2009 Trek 7.6fx
2013 Jamis Satellite
2014 Terry Burlington
Centerpulls were fairly popular up to about the mid-80's. Then they sort of fell out of favor.
They have some of the same advantages as cantis (good clearance both ways), but use the same mounts as side pulls.
re-cur-sion ri'-ker-shen n: see recursion
In the 70s you could get both centerpull and sidepull caliper brakes. The sidepulls were cheaper and didn't work as well as centerpulls. Then they started making sidepulls that were superior to centerpulls. So it really depends on the brake design and quality. Cantis have always been the brake of choice for touring with a loaded bike.
Oil is good, grease is better.
2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72