I found in Competitor Northwest magazine's August issue an interesting marathon training plan. I call it the "marathon trainer for triathletes who get bored with running" but it's really a multi-sport version of a marathon training plan. I did all-running last year and got a little bored, but I really did stick with it. I'm about to shift gears to marathon training from triathlon training and this is looking really appealing. I get a chance to keep some of my base in my triathlon sports but still train for the marathon. It won't feel really weird to pick up the bike in December/January when I start IM training (still a weird thing for me to say).
I tried to find the plan online with no luck. The basic plan has very few days off, but has lots of easy days built in.
Basically:
Monday: easy something - bike, run, or swim
Tuesday: moderate - always a bike or run, some hills, some tempo, some sprints
Wednesday: moderate - some hills, some tempo, some easy swims, some easy runs
Thursday: easy run, later in the plan some hills
Friday: varies week to week, 1 hour swim or run
Saturday: short easy run or bike
Sunday: alternating long run and long bike ride (longest run 22 miles, longest ride 3 hours)
I'm a little concerned it's not enough running, but I suppose I could swap out some of the riding/swimming days for more running days. I have held most of my running improvement even though I've seriously slacked off on my running over the summer. I don't want to make up for it all at once, but if I need to put in more miles on my feet, I need to put in more miles.
My goal is to cut about 2 minutes off of my 12 minute pace from last year, where I got beat in the last 6 miles (of course). It was my first marathon, very educational. I would settle for a 10:30 pace. I would truly settle for finishing and some better weather than last year.
Anyone have any advice? Should I try it, or should I stick with a traditional marathon pound the pavement type plan? Will it actually help me keep my base, or will I just burn out on all 3 sports?




Reply With Quote
. I don't mean to sound negative -- I don't know if this kind of program will work well or not. It very well might. I'm a little skeptical, but I think what I would want to do is take a hard look at my goals, figure out what I need to do to acheive the goals, and see if the program measures up from that perspective.
) is that the second longest run on the long run week (40 min) is probably not more than 6 miles or so (unless you're very fast!). I would want to see at least one, maybe more, 10-12 milers (or some 30/35ish bike rides to do a similar amount of work without the pounding -- but keeping your hr up pretty high if it's going to really substitute for running) in a week that included a 19-mile long run. Also the mileage is pretty low to support those long runs -- the long run is more than half of your weekly mileage. For me, I would worry about how comfortable I'd be maintaining my pace for the long run distance without more endurance training during the week. But again, that's just my comfort zone, others' mileage may vary
.
