Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Shorter cranks?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Jolt is offline Dodging the potholes...
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    1,668

    Shorter cranks?

    I was just wondering how to tell if one should change to shorter cranks--from what I've heard, this makes it easier to spin efficiently which I sometimes have trouble with on some of the hills (and yes, my bike has a triple chainring and I use it). Is there any correlation with height? I'm 5'2", approx. 30" inseam (in stocking feet).
    2011 Surly LHT
    1995 Trek 830

  2. #2
    Kitsune06 Guest
    30" inseam at 5'2"? Good Lord, woman, you're all legs!


    ...but alas, no helpful suggestions... just peanut-gallery type commentary.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    that's what i was thinking too. Leave it to you to say it out loud!
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitsune06 View Post
    30" inseam at 5'2"? Good Lord, woman, you're all legs!


    ...but alas, no helpful suggestions... just peanut-gallery type commentary.
    Seriously??? - says 29" inseam (cyling inseam that is.... crotch to floor) at 5'0"

    but to the question.. if you cannot get proper knee/pedal alignment with your current cranks you may need shorter ones. I would leave it to an experienced bike fitter to tell you if you need/can use shorter ones, but I can tell you as another smaller rider I have 165's on all of my bikes.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    western Colorado
    Posts
    442
    I have 165s on 3 of my bikes.

    I have 165mm Ultegra triple, 105 triple (not on a bike yet), Sugino trekking triple, and XT cranksets.

    My mtn bike does not yet have 165s, but I'm keeping an eye out on ebay for a set. I don't mtn bike too much anyway.
    Specialized Ruby
    Gunnar Sport
    Salsa Vaya Ti
    Novara Randonee x2
    Motobecane Fantom CXX (Surly Crosscheck)
    Jamis Dragon

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,737
    I have 165's too. I can't compare them to aything else, my bike just came with them and the LBS guy seemed to think that would be good someone my size (smallish).

    And FTR, I am 5'3", and not "all legs" by any stretch of the imagination. I just measured my inseam - crotch to floor - it was 29.5" (hard to measure yrouself efficiently though).

    barb
    It is never too late to be what you might have been. ~ George Elliot


    My podcast about being a rookie triathlete:Kelownagurl Tris Podcast

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    143
    Funny, I'm 5'1.75 with a 29.6 inseam. Pretty close and certainly not leggy. I was nervous when I built a new bike and my fitter urged me to go to the standard crank length. I had only ridden my tiny wsd with 165 cranks. I can actually spin much faster now. I think it has more to do with my position on the bike and lighter wheels. I was pushed really far back on my old bike and forced to use my hamstrings more. My custom bike allows me to use my quads more which can fire much quicker. My understanding is that it's more about femural length in relation to your overall height. I trusted my fitter and I'm happy is all I know now. s

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •