Hmmm, I have to say I found that paper mentioned in the article to be a bit ridiculous. I mean if someone is going to say that a healthier way of life, be it through cycling, running, or any means of regular exercise - is then going to cause an increase in consumption - then pray tell, what is the alternative? should we all get off our bikes and sit down at Mcdonalds daily so we can be dead by 35? What it doesn't mention is how destructive those non-healthy lifestyles are - fast food is incredibly costly in terms of resources used to raise livestock - meaning water, soil, grain, etc. THen you have to consider the enormous costs of medical care for those that live sedentary lives. There are a slew of other factors - I thought the paper was turning reason and common sense on their collective heads!
I agreed much more with what the gentleman from the bicycling group said....focus on using fewer resources, less destructive practices.



Reply With Quote