Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    20

    Compac double vs triple

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    my new bike is a Felt, 43cm, with 650 wheels and is a compact. Some people have told me the 650 wheels will really slow me down and the compact doesn't help either. Did I make a mistake??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    The compact won't help? What were you looking for help with? Climbing? Top speed? Here's the compromise, generally speaking between a triple and a compact double: In return for the easier shifting and lighter weight you often get with a compact, you likely give up the biggest gear(s) and smallest
    gear(s) and a few gears in between that your triple offered.

    If you need an easier climbing gear than the compact provides, you can remedy that by getting a cassette with a bigger spread, e.g., going from a 12-25 cassette, to a 12-27 or, in my case, a 13-28. There are lots of options with cassettes; it's just a question of making sure your rear derailleur can handle it and changing out the chain.

    Most of the women I know--unless they race--can generally deal with losing their biggest gear with a compact. You may end up spinning out descending steep hills, but it's not that big of a deal. As for the gears in the middle of the spread that you lose, it's often a matter of getting used to it. I use a compact after having ridden a triple for a while. I miss some of my flatland gears at times; the triple made it easier to find the sweet spot, but I've adapted.

    So, without knowing what kind of gears you need given your terrain, it's hard to conclusively say whether a compact is the best option for you.

    I can't speak to 650 wheels. It's my understanding that for certain small size bikes, they are an appropriate option. If that's the case for you, I'm not sure I'd lose any sleep over it. But that's me. I don't even have a speedometer on my bikes.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,897
    Quote Originally Posted by Custardcup1 View Post
    my new bike is a Felt, 43cm, with 650 wheels and is a compact. Some people have told me the 650 wheels will really slow me down and the compact doesn't help either. Did I make a mistake??
    Do not listen to these people. Just enjoy riding your bike.

    I went from a bike with a triple and a 9-speed cassette to a bike with a compact double and a 10-speed cassette, and using Sheldon Brown's gear ratio calculator I was able to determine that the easiest gear was the same on both bikes. The same frame was available with a triple and a 10-speed cassette, and that would have given me a lower gear, but I've found that the compact double is fine for me, despite the fact that there are some very steep hills around here and I have asthma that is triggered by riding up steep hills.

    I also find that the compact double requires much less adjusting than the triple derailleur.

    As for the wheels, I think it's most important that you have a bike that fits you and is comfortable to ride. Discomfort slows you down.

    And you can always look into getting different wheels later, possibly a different size or the same size but with other features that help you ride faster.

    - Gray 2010 carbon WSD road bike, Rivet Independence saddle
    - Red hardtail 26" aluminum mountain bike, Bontrager Evoke WSD saddle
    - Royal blue 2018 aluminum gravel bike, Rivet Pearl saddle

    Gone but not forgotten:
    - Silver 2003 aluminum road bike
    - Two awesome worn out Juliana saddles

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,698
    A change in wheel size will affect the gearing. I found this Wikipedia article helpful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gear_inches. Also check out Sheldon Brown's gear calculator, linked at the bottom of that article.

    I have ridden 650 wheels and I've ridden 700 wheels. Honestly, the only concession I ever made to the 650s was that I generally picked a slightly harder cog on the cassette than I would have on the 700s. If you find yourself undergeared, it's not too hard to increase the gearing at either the cassette or the chainrings. IMO, the slight reduction in gearing is worth it if those smaller wheels help you achieve a better, more comfortable fit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    492
    First of all, congratulations on your new bike!!

    Many road bikes made today don't even have the option of coming with a triple because the extra weight slows the bike down. Having said that, if you need a triple for climbing, it is totally worth any extra weight.

    I went from a triple to compact double on my road bike and haven't missed the triple at all. It isn't mountainous around here, but plenty of rolling hills. It certainly hasn't slowed me down.

    I can't speak personally to the tires, but a quick google search came up with this which indiicates that the tires are not going to slow you down either:

    "Finally, there’s the question of the speed value of 700c versus 650c. There will always be exponents of one wheel size versus the other. My training partner slays everyone on straight-line descents, even those who weigh considerably more than him, and he swears it’s his 650c wheels. Others claim differently. One cannot deny, however, than many of the very fastest bike rides in the history of timed triathlon racing occurred on 650c wheels, both in the men’s and women’s fields. All this is anecdotal, however rides in Zofingen, IM Canada, IM New Zealand, IM Hawaii, IM Germany—most of the big courses in the big races of yesteryear, when 650c wheels were popular—still stand up today, as much as 12 and 15 years after they were accomplished."

    Now, the bigger question is who on earth are these people who are trying to bring you down about your new bike?? As long as you are comfortable riding it, DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM! There is always someone with a different opinion about what is faster. You have your nice new bike now. Have fun with it and don't second guess yourself! Have you posted a picture yet?


    Grits

    2010 Trek 5.2 Madone WSD, SI Diva Gel Flow
    2002 Terry Classic, Terry Liberator

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Rowland Hts, CA
    Posts
    461
    +1 on sucha a great explanation from Indysteel

    If you are very short, sometimes, the only bikes you fit on are the XXS bikes with the 650cc tires. Yes, the 650cc wheels are smaller, hence, likely you will be slower per pedal spin. However, if the small bike fits better than a bigger bike with 700cc, then you made the right bike decision.

    As for the crankset, the compact helps to go up the hill compared to standard cranksets. Triples are heavier, but have more gears if you ride in very hilly areas. Personally, for me, triples are slightly complicated on road bikes because, as far as I know, there are no numbers on the handlebars that let you know whether you are on the big, middle, or smallest gear (unlike my hybrid or a mountain bike).
    _______________________________
    2012 Specialized Amira Elite, upgraded carbon handle bars, Jett saddle 143mm switched to 145mm 2012 Selle Italia Max SLR Gel Flow saddle

    2011 Specialized Ariel Sport,suspension post,Serfas Rx Women's Microfiber saddle

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Grits View Post
    Having said that, if you need a triple for climbing, it is totally worth any extra weight.
    I think this misstates the issue. A triple is not, in and of itself, better for climbing. It depends on what cassette it is paired with. You can pair a compact double to a widely spaced cassette that essentially provides the same easy gears that a triple theoretically does. With that fix, what is lost are the gears in the middle of the gear range. Between the more widely spaced chainrings of a compact and more widely spaced cogs of a cassette geared for hard climbing, you end up with bigger gaps between gears, which makes finding just the right gear for flat or windy conditions a bit more challenging. To me, that is the real downside of a compact double. The climbing concerns are easily overcome.

    I also like triples on real rolling terrain. At least for me, I end up having to shift "up front" a lot more on rollers with a compact than I would with the average triple set up. With a triple, I can often just shift between my rear cogs on rollers. Either way you're shifting, but for some reason, I prefer my shifts be within the rear cassette and not up front between chainrings. Maybe because I'm lazy.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Custardcup1 View Post
    my new bike is a Felt, 43cm, with 650 wheels and is a compact. Some people have told me the 650 wheels will really slow me down and the compact doesn't help either. Did I make a mistake??
    What everyone else said. If you need a 43cm, then it's unlikely that you could ride a bike with 700c wheels.

    Triple vs. compact double is a little weird. It's hard finding off-the-shelf bikes with nicer-than-entry-level components with a triple crankset. The shifting on a compact double is nicer and the bike overall ends up lighter. If you have a lot of steep hills, then a triple might be better.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lakewood, Co
    Posts
    1,061
    Anti 650c talk has been around forever. In the mid 90's my 1st small frame had 650c wheels and I was hearing the same kind of comments. That said, I love my 650's so much that I stayed with them when I had my custom frame built. At the same time I also demoed a bike with 700c wheels and honestly couldn't tell the difference.

    Here's more information about 650c wheelsets,

    http://www.rodbikes.com/blog/?p=355

    I also have a compact crank, it's a Specialities TA crankset with a 48t big ring in the front. Rear is 13x29 ( Campy cassette). I do spin out on downhills but get much more use from my big ring. I can climb most hillls even though I don't ride hills as much as I used to. I love my 48t ring, I often stay in that ring on easy climbs.

    I've never had a triple so I can't compare but my observation of the women I knew riding triples is they almost never used their big ring in the front on rolling terrain except for downhills (I'm sure some here will disagree).

    If you find your having trouble with hills consider getting a larger cassette. Also, make sure you carry a tube with you in case of flats. Other than that you'll be fine, enjoy your new bike.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    575
    You didn't make a mistake if your new bike fits and it's the highest quality that fit into your budget.

    I had a vintage frame updated with an entirely new drive train, including a triple chain ring. As Kathi mentioned, I only use my big ring on lengthy downhills. While you are wondering if you should have gotten a triple, I used to wonder whether I should have gone with a compact double. Sometimes we do too much second guessing. I say "If the bike fits, ride it"
    LORI
    Pivot Mach 4 / WTB
    Updated Vintage Terry Symmetry / Bontrager InForm RL WSD

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Jacksonville area of NC
    Posts
    821
    I have 1 road bike with 650c (Trek 2000 older bike) and a Felt F-5 with 700c. As far as the wheels don't know if it really makes that much difference. The F-5 fits me better (bought the Trek used and the Felt new). The biggest difference really is that the 700c are much more common so if you are riding with a group and get a flat you are much more likely for someone to have a tire if you didn't bring one. With the 650c you'd most likely better make sure you have a spare with you.

    Now for the triple vs the compact double. Again the Trek has the triple and the Felt has the compact double. Personally I like the triple much better. I just am not nearly as happy with the gearing on the compact double and may change it to a triple at some point in the future.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,176
    I think you've got a great bike!

    You'll find out more from riding your bike than listening to the numpties. You may want to make a few changes in the set up, but you'll only figure out what to do based on what happens when you ride. So go ride and have some fun!

    I have certainly owned a few bikes that were pretty far from perfect and a few that were much better, but I'm smarter now because of them.
    Each day is a gift, that's why it is called the present.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    I don't do a lot of climbing, but I do use my big ring on flat ground if I feel up to it and on descents. I don't use my little ring a whole lot, but that'll probably change if/when I start doing more climbing. My fitter says I should probably switch to a compact double for both mechanical and knee reasons, but I like the feel of the triple vs. that of the compact double, though I suppose I could get used to it. I'd personally like gearing that is good for a bit of everything, so I'm a little wary of losing gears with a double. (Right now, I have climbing gears and "go fast" gears, but no cruising gears...)
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,698
    Quote Originally Posted by malkin View Post
    I have certainly owned a few bikes that were pretty far from perfect and a few that were much better, but I'm smarter now because of them.
    Like!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    20
    Thanks everyone for the info and encouragement!! I love the way my bike looks and fits me. It's the only one of many I tried that really felt right. I am just going to ride the bike and enjoy myself. If I really find I think I need a triple, I can make some changes at a later date, but for now I think I just have to take the time to get used to a road bike. This is my first one, I had a Trek Hybrid before. Thanks again, this forum is great!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •