Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Contessa

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    53

    Contessa

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Liza: I am new to the forum and was checking out the old threads found out you have a Scott Contessa. Whats your opinion on this bike. Is it fast? Is it stiff, absords road vibrations?
    I'm 4' 11" with a 27.5 inseam. can girls who are the same height tell me what you are riding?
    Last edited by hid558; 06-07-2009 at 03:45 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,414

    Contessa CR1 Pro

    I am very, very happy with it. There are several bikes in the "Contessa" line, btw, with quite different frames and components. I have the Contessa CR1 Pro.

    It is not the lightest bike in the stock build (I think it's around 17lbs in M), but the frame itself is quite light -- I think a good part of the weight is wheels and components (it comes with Mavic Ksyrium Equipes, which are sturdy but not light).

    It is crazy, crazy stiff. It really jumps when you sprint and it climbs exceptionally well. My BF has a Madone 5.2 (it's 2007, before the redesign and before the line became enormous and confusing, and it has OCLV carbon), and in comparison my bike feels a little stiffer and faster, even though the OCLV carbon is very nice. We test rode a lot of bikes when he was looking, and our favorite by a long shot was the Cervelo R3 (ended up being more than he wanted to spend though). The Scott, though not as light, has a similar feel -- very fast acceleration, lively frame.

    The carbon is very smooth and lively, but it is so stiff that extremely rough pavement or gravel will rattle your teeth. It will damp road vibrations, but you really feel bumps and pavement flaws. I have ridden carbon bikes (and steel bikes, actually) that have a much softer ride... so the stiffness is a trade off.

    It's very quick handling. Even with a 120mm stem, my bike feels a bit twitchier than bf's Madone.

    Hope that helps . I'm happy to answer specific questions too.
    Last edited by VeloVT; 06-08-2009 at 11:23 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    589
    I'm 4'11" and I think have a slightly longer inseam than you. This means I can happily ride some 47-49cm frames that most would consider too big for us sub-5' gals.

    My nice bike is a Wilier Izoard. Super light, super stiff, crazy fast. Absorbs chatter well enough, but you still feel the road especially when you hit something.

    I was quite impressed with the Scott bike I test rode as well (it was the men's version of the Contessa Race) and it came in second in my bike quest. I'd say it's got a little less get up and go and a little more comfort (better with the bumps). It's still got plenty of "go", more than many of it's competitors; the Wilier will just drop you off the back end and take off without you if you aren't careful though (which I think is fun)!

    I also have a Giant OCR3w that I commute on and am quite happy with for that purpose. The more sloping top tube gives me more clearance than the Wilier, which may be an issue for you. Giant's carbon offerings might be worth looking at if the more traditional (straight horizontal) geometries aren't giving you the standover (Specialized is good for standover as well and the Ruby is a fun little bike).

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •