Best Places to Live

[snowtulip]

Hi Everyone,
I tried the search function, because I vaguely remember a thread about this, but couldn't find it, so here goes.

DH and I had planned to buy some land in a city that we want to move to in the future. We are at that point in time when we can start putting some money toward that, however, five or so years ago we had a destination in mind that is not currently in line with our vision of the future. So we've been discussing what we want in a place to live.

How have you went about figuring your dream destination to live?

We know that we want to be somewhere with mountains, good bike and outdoor community, and this is the new one - dh wants to be in driving distance of surfing (didn't fit into our formula 5 yrs. ago), it also can't be extremely cold in the winter, and must have at least one movie theater and one bookstore.

Any advice on how you choose your place or advice about cities that fit the above bill, please let me know.

Thanks!!!

[PinkBike]

i'd say central coast of california. i think it probably has it all.
anybody from there wanna chime in?
i'd say san diego except no mountains, boulder except too cold, the south (south texas thru georgia) except no surf?

[Xrayted]

Yes, I think there was a thread about this in Nov or Dec, 2006. The web site is www.findyourspot.com. Check it out.

[kat_h]

If you're looking worldwide I'd say southern Sweden.

[crazycanuck]

Ummm if you don't want to spend a fortune on a house, Australia & NZ aren't great options atm...

[tulip]

If it weren't for the surfing, I'd suggest Asheville. How would he like white water kayaking and rafting instead??

I'm currently in a similar quest. I've always wanted to live in Europe. I lived there once for a few months, but circumstances were different, and it did not work out. Now, however, I think I could do it. Paris, Dublin, Bordeaux, and some smaller cities in western France come to mind for me. I'm fortunate in that I am an EU citizen, so that really cuts down on the hassle.

My criteria are near the sea, access to a city, good cycling, fresh markets (European markets or farmers markets), and as few shopping centers, cul-de-sacs, and SUVs as possible. Oh, and good gardening climate.

[snowtulip]

Thanks for input everyone. It's amazing how hard it is to decide! DH and I even did a search on a small town we loved when we were in Slovenia, but don't think we are ready to leave our families that far away.

Our friends keep mentioning Asheville or Portland, I love Portland and have never been to Asheville. The whole surfing thing is throwing the formula off.

FindSpot seems to want us to move to Arkansas?

Thanks everyone!

[froglegs]

I live on the central coast of CA, in Santa Maria which is probably the least expensive central coast city with a beach climate (once you get past San Luis Obispo, it gets to be more of a desert climate).

It is about 10 miles from the ocean and there are plenty of mountains, quiet beautiful roads to ride on, and good places to surf all within a few minutes to an hour's drive. The weather simply can't be beat (average high for January is 64, July is 74). It really is a great place to live if you can find a local job, or don't mind having a (possibly very long) commute.

It does have a movie theater and a bookstore, but the bookstore is pretty small and is in the mall, which sucks. If I want to go to a bookstore I usually go up to SLO, or go one right next to my work in Goleta.

I probably would rather live in SLO (I did in college) but it is pretty expensive.

[Tuckervill]

Little Rock and Fayetteville, AR are great places to live (I'm sure those are the two places findyourspot recommended--and did you get Albuquerque, too?). If I had my choice, I'd choose Fayetteville, but just because of more progressive politics. Cultural amenities are more accessible in Little Rock, though Fayetteville has its opportunities, mostly due to the university, which brings a diverse and educated population from other places.

How many states have their very own encyclopedia? http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/

If you like outdoor stuff, Arkansas is a great place to live, although the economy seems too skewed towards fishing and hunting, and not so much towards more physical stuff. It's coming along, though. We have lots of places for paddle sports, including the pristine Buffalo National River. Lots of mountain biking opportunities. Of course, the roads are wide open for cycling, but we have some ways to go to educate drivers. The Ozark Highlands Trail is one of the best hiking trails in the country, and is pristine and mostly undiscovered.

I live only 30 miles from Fayetteville. I lived in the Little Rock area for many years and still own a house there. Hundreds and thousands of retirees from the North (Yankees!) have settled in the Harrison, Hot Springs and Mountain Home areas, so there must be something good about Arkansas.

Karen

[Blueberry]

Hmmm....maybe it's time to re-think where I live

I did the find your spot, and ALL of my results (except for 3) were in AK, WA or OR. I had one each in Maine, Vermont and Mass.

I think perhaps NC isn't the best place for me

[bmccasland]

Yes, I think there was a thread about this in Nov or Dec, 2006. The web site is www.findyourspot.com. Check it out.

But they didn't ask to pick your poison - fire season, hurricane season, tornado season, ice season, or random earthquakes. (OK, they sort of got to winter). How about something near a coast without damp grey winters, and not in the hurricane blow zone where I can actually afford home owner's insurance and won't need flood insurance???? The only good thing I can say about hurricanes above the others is that you know two days in advance you're going to get hit - the others are pretty much unpredictable. And tornadoes scare the dickens out of me. The only time they're fun to watch is from the safety of my TV.

[Duck on Wheels]

If it were affordable, I'd say Santa Cruz, California fits your description. But the housing prices there (well, last I looked, which is now 6 years ago) are insane. There is surfing as far north as San Francisco, but the rip tides are dangerous and the water is pretty cold (Humboldt Current, ya know). As you go southwards, if you stay north of Santa Barbara and keep you distance from the occasional nuclear power plant, there are some nice communities with hills to east of them and surf to the west. Some, but not all of these, are affordable. From Santa Barbara southwards gets pretty expensive again.

[spokewench]

Big Bear - California - snow skiiing, mountain biking - I think it is close enough to San Diego/La Jolla area for surfin

[Drtgirl]

I agree with the above posts- Asheville is great. Nice weather, small town, awesome outdoor activities.

I live in Seattle but if I had a choice, I'd move somewhere that has drier and warmer weather. Somewhere like Bend, Oregon

[bruiser]

Try looking in the Northwest (US) if you think California is too expensive (I do). Anywhere in the Willamette Valley (from about Portland down to Eugene) puts you no more than an hour from mountains and an hour from the coasts. The surfing definitely is not as good as Cali, but its at least possible. I know lots of people who surf our beaches year-round. And you can't beat the cycling (especially through wine country )!
The weather is mild, and it rarely gets hotter than 100 or colder than 20. The rain isn't as bad as people complain about; I think all the whiners are the California-imports, anyway ! But if you think grey winters would be a drag, try looking at central Oregon. It puts you closer to the mountains (and lots of snow instead of rain) but farther from the beach.


Granted, I am little biased as I have lived in the Willamette Valley for most of my life. Out of the 24 FindYourSpot locations, I think I got all of the Oregon cities... Coincidence?