Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3

    Help me choose a ruby size?

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Hi everyone,

    I'm new to WSD bikes and am very excited about purchasing a specialized ruby comp. I am 5'6", with an inseam of 77cm. This calculates out according to the bike-fit guidelines to a frame size of about 52.
    When I ride the ruby 54cm, I get a cramp in between my shoulder blades and have a bit of trouble in the wrists. The 51cm feels much better-- but is there some downside to getting a smaller bike? Something I might regret later?
    Anyone with similar measurements? I'm curious to know what size you all have. I tried a Trek 5000 WSD in a 54 and it felt too big, and then the 51 felt too small, so I'm confused...

    thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Temecula, CA
    Posts
    45
    I have a Ruby Expert and I think I'm about the same size as you. I have a 54 and the lbs just shortened the stem for me and now it's perfect. I love love love my Ruby.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    at least 2 carats!
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    691
    amgdjp,

    I think the bike shop folks are in a much better position to evaluate which size bike will fit you better. The shoulder blade soreness could be caused by a lot of different things -- the bike size, the handlebar width, the handlebar height, stem length -- just to name a few.

    I may be able to help clear up the confusion about sizing on the Trek vs. the Specialized. Trek measures bike size from the center of the bottom bracket to the top of the seat tube, most other manufacturers measure from center to center. A 51cm Trek is like another manufacturer's 49cm, which is why the 51cm Trek felt really small to you.

    Does that make sense?

    -- Melissa

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3
    totally makes sense- thanks!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    stand over + seat tube measurements, though most shops use them as a fitting start point really aren't the best way to get your ideal bike size too. I'm leggy enough to be riding a 48cm (I have a Ruby btw), but my upper body and arms are short, so even with my 44cm I had to shorten the stem! If I went solely by inseam I'd be riding a bike that is way too big. If the 51 feels better it likely is. If you can get them to do it - if anyone in the shop really knows how to fit a bike!, have someone who will look at more than just whether or not you can stand over the bike put you on both of them and see which suits your entire body better. They should check your knee/crank position and your reach at very least.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •