Brevet this October - insane idea?

I am sorely tempted to try out a RUSA Brevet in mid-October (SE Ohio). It is 200k, and am trying to decide if this is a totally insane idea to shoot for in my first year of cycling...given that is only 4 months away - but that is 4 months away! I would need to do some serious training to get my legs ready for a trip of that length as right now I am only up to 30 miles...

Obviously I would need to do a lot of work to get ready for this - which is fine considering it involves my bike - am just rolling the idea around and seeing what it feels like. This is the kind of riding that got me interested enough to learn how to ride in the first place :D

Now I have a touring bike that FITS me and feels great to ride, I am seriously considering it. This October date is the earliest that I would consider - there is one in Nashville, TN in late November, but it is certainly easier for me to get to Ohio...

Is this a totally insane idea?

Go for it!

Where would we be if we didn't shoot for insane things? Grab life with both hands and give it a big wet kiss!

http://xkcd.com/752/

Sister Madonna Buder does Ironman tris, and she's in her 80's. She didn't even start running until she was 50. Sounds like she's doing insane things, eh?

Go for it!

Do you really need the external validation?
Do or do not...

Go for it! Everyone needs a goal, right? ;)

I'd offer to join you, but it's likely I'll be running the Columbus marathon the next day. Not that I've signed up for that, or even made a mental commitment to it, yet...

Hard to tell what the terrain might be like, and they haven't posted a route yet. It'll almost surely be hilly, but the really insane hills are southeast. Starting from the southwest side of Columbus makes it likelier you'll go southwest, since there are a limited number of places to cross the river. If you want to, you can be ready.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zen

Do you really need the external validation?
Do or do not...

---

No, it isn't for the validation - I was just wondering how insane this sounded for someone in her first year of cycling :) I am good at extremes, and have learned over the years that the occasional reality check is a good thing ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OakLeaf

Go for it! Everyone needs a goal, right? ;)

I'd offer to join you, but it's likely I'll be running the Columbus marathon the next day. Not that I've signed up for that, or even made a mental commitment to it, yet...

Hard to tell what the terrain might be like, and they haven't posted a route yet. It'll almost surely be hilly, but the really insane hills are southeast. Starting from the southwest side of Columbus makes it likelier you'll go southwest, since there are a limited number of places to cross the river. If you want to, you can be ready.

---

This is great information - and should you decide that this sounds like more fun than the marathan let me know :D I think that Map My Ride gives assorted training plans for different needs and I will check theirs out. I need to do this in a way that I will be ready without burning myself out/hurting myself. I am good at extremes, sometimes too good :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KnottedYet

Go for it!

Where would we be if we didn't shoot for insane things? Grab life with both hands and give it a big wet kiss!

http://xkcd.com/752/

Sister Madonna Buder does Ironman tris, and she's in her 80's. She didn't even start running until she was 50. Sounds like she's doing insane things, eh?

Go for it!

---

Go Sister Madonna Buder! I didn't step over the top tube of a bike until 2 months after my 50th, so there seems to be hope for me :)

+1 on grabbing life with both hands and giving it a big wet kiss! The longer I cycle/better shape I get into - and because of that the more I feel like reaching out and grabbing life! Too many years of being over-weight and working FAR too much pretty much kept me from everything but my computer and television. As I said in a post several months ago, cycling does indeed seem to be the fountain of youth - at least for me :D

Wow, you sure have chutzpah! I mean that in the best way. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redrhodie

Wow, you sure have chutzpah! I mean that in the best way. ;)

---

Thank you for the compliment :D

You should try a hilly metric first, and if that goes ok, then do a hilly century, and if you can do that then do the 200k. A lot of the distance cycling takes time and experience, to learn what you can and cannot eat and drink during the ride, when you need to eat and drink, knowing what and when to eat and drink when a new route is more hilly than expected or a hot wind blows in your face for miles, contributing to potential dehydration, along with gaining experience on climbing, getting the leg muscles strong, learning how to react in certain situations so that the reactions are instinctive, etc.

If you train for a metric first, when you finish the metric you will know if you can do a century or a brevet. At the end of a metric you should feel like you can bike another 40 miles easily and with enjoyment. If you suffered during the ride, or if the next day you complain about torn leg muscles, aches, pains and extraordinary fatigue, then you know you are not ready for a century yet, or a brevet.

I finished a century yesterday with about 5000 feet of climbing. The temperature was about ten degrees hotter than expected. A strong headwind came up in the early afternoon. Some cyclists called it quits for mostly heat-related issues. When we got back to the starting point, one century cyclist was prostate on the floor shivering in spasms while event volunteers put ice on him and waited for the ambulance to show up; the man was suffering from heat exhaustion. These are the kinds of situations a cyclist has to train for to prevent anything happening to them on a long ride. It is best to train for a metric, and if the ride suits you, then train for the century, and build up to the brevet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

You should try a hilly metric first, and if that goes ok, then do a hilly century, and if you can do that then do the 200k. A lot of the distance cycling takes time and experience, to learn what you can and cannot eat and drink during the ride, when you need to eat and drink, knowing what and when to eat and drink when a new route is more hilly than expected or a hot wind blows in your face for miles, contributing to potential dehydration, along with gaining experience on climbing, getting the leg muscles strong, learning how to react in certain situations so that the reactions are instinctive, etc. ....

---

This is good information - thanks. I had assumed a progression of something like this - bit it is helpful to read it. I was thinking tonight about the difference of being able to stay in the saddle for the 13.5 hours allowed for the 200k compared to the amount of time I am currently accustomed to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

This is good information - thanks. I had assumed a progression of something like this - bit it is helpful to read it. I was thinking tonight about the difference of being able to stay in the saddle for the 13.5 hours allowed for the 200k compared to the amount of time I am currently accustomed to.

---

There are things experience teach you to do. Well first a metric will show you if you have the right saddle or not, because if you don't, you will figure it out on the metric and in a painful way. Also, when the shorts are perfect with the saddle you will know with just one short ride that it is a perfect match. It can take a couple of years just to find the right shorts for you. For example, I love the Voler elite shorts sold on volerwear.com because they have a higher rise and the pad is one of the best on the market. There are other little things to do to prevent saddle soreness and one is I carry the chamois cream in the little packets in my jersey pocket, and at every SAG stop where I use a Porta potty, I apply an entire packet of the cream. I don't get saddle soreness or tissue abrasions. My saddle is the Selle An-Atomica, made in Wisconsin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

There are things experience teach you to do. Well first a metric will show you if you have the right saddle or not, because if you don't, you will figure it out on the metric and in a painful way. Also, when the shorts are perfect with the saddle you will know with just one short ride that it is a perfect match. It can take a couple of years just to find the right shorts for you. For example, I love the Voler elite shorts sold on volerwear.com because they have a higher rise and the pad is one of the best on the market. There are other little things to do to prevent saddle soreness and one is I carry the chamois cream in the little packets in my jersey pocket, and at every SAG stop where I use a Porta potty, I apply an entire packet of the cream. I don't get saddle soreness or tissue abrasions. My saddle is the Selle An-Atomica, made in Wisconsin.

---

Thanks for the information, and I have been wondering how long of a ride it might take to determine if my Brooks is really the saddle for me. My calculator tells me that if I add 6 miles a week to my "long" ride then I will be up to 200k by the end of September - that seems a reasonable way to build my mileage base. Guess I should find some hillier places to ride though :D I am thinking that as my endurance/fitness increases that I may be able to build it a little more quickly.

I have been lusting over some Bib shorts that TE sells, am saving up for them and will check out the Volerwear site. Thanks again!

Heya Catrin, love the attitude :)

I had a similar question involving a brevet the first year I started road biking. For various reasons I didn't do it then and haven't done it yet, mostly because I realized that even the training I was doing at the time was taking a bit too much time away from my family. I wish I could get up early and do long long rides in the early morning, but fact is I need a lot of sleep too, especially when training a lot, and without it everything deteriorates including my mood and temper. So I'm headed for the long slow approach instead. That brevet of mine is not going anywhere and I'll do it someday :-)

I did have a similar project last year to tackle a long climb (rock climbing), much longer than I'd ever done before. I learnt a whole lot of stuff from it, mostly what a total wimp I turn into when I've been awake for 24 hours... and to bring that over to bike riding, I'd say:

- do do the metrics and the centuries first. Don't skip them because you don't have the time, or they're too uncomfortable, or whatever, they're invaluable learning opportunities.
- don't overestimate the physical challenge, and don't underestimate the mental challenge.
- analyze every long ride to see where your weak points are and where your strong points are, and adjust accordingly. That slight irritation you notice on a metric could wreck your brevet completely.
- pay attention to your tolerance to the weather.

And don't kill yourself to reach that one goal. It would be really cool to do it in your first year of riding, but not if it costs you an injury. It'll still be there next year.

And maybe at some point I'll even go take my own advice, and do my own brevet! :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lph

Heya Catrin, love the attitude :)

.......And don't kill yourself to reach that one goal. It would be really cool to do it in your first year of riding, but not if it costs you an injury. It'll still be there next year.

And maybe at some point I'll even go take my own advice, and do my own brevet! :p

---

There are some advantages to being a single woman with no pets - I can't feel guilty about taking time away from the home-front ;) Yes, it will be really cool if I can celebrate my 51st birthday this way (the brevet is the week of my birthday) but the world won't come to an end if it takes me a little longer. It does help being a woman of a, shall we say, persistent nature :D

I think Darcy's advice--about doing a metric and then a century--is good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

My calculator tells me that if I add 6 miles a week to my "long" ride then I will be up to 200k by the end of September - that seems a reasonable way to build my mileage base.

---

That makes it sound pretty doable, although if you end up being like me, the mileage progression isn't quite so linear. Like you, I accomplished a pretty significant goal within my first year of cycling in that I bought my first road bike in July of 2006 and did a 160-mile one-day ride exactly a year later. In building up to that mileage, I experienced certain mileage "plateaus."

During my first summer/fall of riding, I got up to about the 45-mile mark without too much fuss. After that, it took some consistent weeks of training to learn how to eat and drink and to get used to the aches and pains that set in after about 3 hours on the bike. After I got used to 45 or so miles, I quickly ramped up to about 60-65 miles (roughly a metric), again without too much fuss. From there, my body needed to adjust again. I spent some time "exploring" the 4-5 hour mark. How to eat, how to drink, how to stretch, when to take a break and when to grunt it out. The season ended at about that point, and I more or less put the bike up for the winter and worked on building my aerobic base with spinning.

When spring came, after a few somewhat painful weeks, I quickly ramped up my mileage back to the 60-mile mark. I then started to also do some speed work. For me, being in the saddle for long hours was a lot easier if I was riding with other people, but most of my riding companions were faster than me. If I was going to ride with my friends, I needed to get faster. So, mixed into my long weekend rides, I added some weekday training rides. My strength and endurance really improved at that point.

It was at this point that I did my first century over Memorial Day, 2007. In preparation for it, I was riding about 150 miles a week and my longest ride to date was 75 miles two weeks before. It was a relatively hilly century and that, probably more than the mileage, made it hard. I finished, but there were times during the ride that it really hurt. It was my first real taste of the mental toughness required for century plus rides.

It took a good week to recover, but after the century, I kicked it up a gear and started riding 200 or more miles a week. Most of my long rides were in the 65-mile range (because that's about the longest ride CIBA offers), but I usually rode that distance both Saturday and Sunday so my body was adjusting to long hours in the saddle. I was also finally able to do some hilly rides in Southern Indiana without feeling like I was going to die, too.

By the time my first year anniversary came around, I felt pretty strong and decided to do the RAIN ride on a bit of a whim. Some of my friends thought I was in over my head, but I felt confident enough to try. I'd also note that I was pretty nervous, too. It was all I could do to keep my breakfast down. :rolleyes:

As it turns out, I felt like a million bucks during that ride. A nice tail wind and relatively comfortable temps helped, but I just felt inherently strong. I did it with a friend who had just finished a cross-country bike trip, and she made for an excellent partner. We did the ride with a 19 mph average and finished in the top third of the finishers. I have to admit that it was one of my prouder moments. I went on that year to do my first week-long tour in September, riding about 400 miles in six days in the hills of Tennessee. Again, I was pretty proud of that.

So, I wholly believe that we can set our sights on pretty ambitious goals. That said, you really need to listen to what your body wants and needs. It likely won't be as simple as doing longer and longer rides each week. Your body will need time to adjust to certain hurdles. If you push too hard, it will push back. But what's the worst that can happen if you try? You train hard and decide ultimately to put it off until next year? So what? There's no shame in that. I will add this, too. It is a lot more fun to do a century (or more) for which you've adequately trained. Yes, it's possible to gut them out, but there's no real joy in it, at least for me.

Catrin, what is your average speed and your average cadence? Those two numbers are important for your training schedule. Just for an ordinary century without too much climbing, a cyclist needs a minimum of a 12 mph average. When you bike distance with longer continuous climbs, speed going up the climbs becomes more important so that the average speed doesn't fall too critically low, so that you don't become a DNF due to not being fast enough. In other words if your average speed is 13 on the flats and rollers, but only 6 on the climbing, then your overall average speed will fall below 12 and you will have time problems. The cadence is important too because too low of a cadence requires more effort and tires the body faster; i.e. a higher spin is more efficient for distance.

Also, be flexible with your goals. I know cyclists who are naturally talented at climbing, who can do miles of continuous climbing with steep grades and they love it. Other cyclists dread climbing and the climbing takes so much energy they lose blood sugar and glycogen and suffer going for distance. You have to get out and find routes with at least 3-5 miles of continuous climbing, keep the speed up, and keep the cadence up. You might discover you hate climbing with a passion and there is nothing wrong with that choice. Some people are naturally gifted climbers, others have to work real hard at it, and some decide the pain is not worth the gain.

Another aspect of your goal is to consider how you want to do the long distances. For example, when I do distance my goal is always to be normal at the end of the ride, go home, have a nice dinner, soak in the tub, do chores and the next day I get up and there is no pain and stiffness. Other people do long distance and can't walk for two weeks.

And, some people do distance and decide that metrics is the distance they prefer. Just about every cyclist on a metric is capable of doing a century, but most of them prefer doing a metric. Century cyclists understand this point. You might finish a metric and realize that is all the distance you want to do, and that is ok, because if your life depended upon it, you could do a century in a pinch, but your preference is to do the metric.

I think you said your long distance now is around 30 miles. You need to change it and 30 miles is your short ride. When 30 miles is your short ride, and you rarely do a ride under 25 miles anymore, and your preferred distance is 40-50 miles, then you are ready for the metric. When your preferred distance moves up to 70 miles, you are ready for the century. You will know it because after every long ride you feel real good, and your perception of the terrain shifts, so that once what used to appear to be huge hills are just now slight bumps in the road.

And, train with a GPS bike computer so that you learn to recognize the grades, how steep you can go, when you need to shift down, and even what grades are just so steep it is smarter to get off the bike and walk.

Finally, there does get to be a time problem with all of the training. The cycling is fantastic, but most of us have only so much time we can spend on it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

Just for an ordinary century without too much climbing, a cyclist needs a minimum of a 12 mph average.

---

The cut-off for a 200K brevet is 13:30. That's a 9.1 mph average.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

You have to get out and find routes with at least 3-5 miles of continuous climbing

---

She's in Indiana. She probably can't go anywhere without climbing a 15% grade, but she'd probably have to go at least 200 miles south to find a 3 mile climb. I'm biased because I live in similar terrain, but IMO the short steep stuff is at least as hard as long and shallow. And anyway, the brevet she's planning will be in terrain very similar to where she lives. There's no reason for her to train in very different terrain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

And, train with a GPS bike computer so that you learn to recognize the grades, how steep you can go, when you need to shift down, and even what grades are just so steep it is smarter to get off the bike and walk.

---

I love my GPS, but for one thing, the real-time grade isn't super accurate (if you really need a gadget, a $20 bubble inclinometer is the way to go) - and more to the point, you don't need a gadget to figure out your own legs. She'll learn to climb by climbing, not by staring at a computer screen. She'll learn how it feels when her legs are running out of steam and she's going to have to unclip. She'll learn when to power up a hill and when to sit and spin. No gadgets required.

Darcy, IndySteel, LPH, Knotted, Zen, and Oakleaf,

Thank you, all of you, for your encouragement and comments. I have also been discussing this with my personal trainer who is a mountain biker (also does road riding) and we are going to tweak my workouts to help support this work. I am summarizing your comments to him at his request so he can help me with this.

Darcy - right now my average speed is a little low, it ranges between 10.9 to 11.5 depending on the day. I am unsure what my average cadence is, every time I think to look at it it seems to be between 80-95 unless I am going up-hill. My uphill speeds have been improving, anywhere from 8.5-11.5 but there are not many real hills in Central Indiana to practice on.

I am already working on alternative places that I can drive to in southern Indiana where this is not a problem. My speed on flats/rollers seems to be between 12-15 at this point - but I have been focusing more on skills rather than speed. Now I have a bike that doesn't hurt me to ride it, that will help. My touring bike isn't a speed demon, but the LHT isn't shabby either.

I just learned how to ride last year, and am very pleased to report that riding 28-29 miles does not leave me overly tired. Really not tired at all, so my next target "long ride" will be 35 after I do a 30. After that I hope to go up in 6-7 mile increments - we will see what my body happens to think about that ;)

Right now I have one "long ride" a week, and as many shorter rides as I can fit in. Last week I managed to ride close to 100 miles over 4 rides which is something of a personal record of mine :D

As I progress I would LIKE to have two long rides a week, time and body permitting, and a couple of shorter rides. 4 days a week has been what I am targeting for, though am trying to listen to my body, and sometimes my schedule or the weather (like today) just doesn't allow it.

IndySteel - thanks for the gentle reminder that our bodies do not often know how to improve in a linear fashion - I will certainly keep your experience in mind. It really is helpful to me to read/hear of the personal experience of others for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OakLeaf

The cut-off for a 200K brevet is 13:30. That's a 9.1 mph average..

---

Are you including the time for stops? Some cyclists don't need much time to use the toilet facilities and to eat and drink, and others need a lot of time. It is reasonable to assume 3 hours of total stop time over a 125 mile distance for a fairly new cyclist. It means she has 10.5 hours to complete 125 miles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OakLeaf

I live in similar terrain, but IMO the short steep stuff is at least as hard as long and shallow. And anyway, the brevet she's planning will be in terrain very similar to where she lives. There's no reason for her to train in very different terrain...

---

Dang, you get long and shallow? I do a 4-mile climb to my house and the lowest grade is 5% and the steepest is 18%. Nasty. I've never been on a ride that has a climb that is long and shallow, or if it was, I just thought of it as being a 3% grade, not a climb.

I thought Catrin had said she wanted to do a brevet in another state and it would be hilly. I live in a state that is mountains and valleys, so when I think hilly I think of long steep grades, not short steep rollers. You are correct, it is a different training technique if the hills are 1/2 mile or less.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

I thought Catrin had said she wanted to do a brevet in another state and it would be hilly. I live in a state that is mountains and valleys, so when I think hilly I think of long steep grades, not short steep rollers. You are correct, it is a different training technique if the hills are 1/2 mile or less.

---

Well, hilly in that it is in southern Ohio and more hilly than Central Indiana - that is different from being in the mountains :) What would be a good training technique if the hills are short and steep?

I am about an hours drive from southern Indiana - and they DO have hills there - they may not be long, but they can get very steep and there are a lot of them!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

Well, hilly in that it is in southern Ohio and more hilly than Central Indiana - that is different from being in the mountains :) What would be a good training technique if the hills are short and steep?

I am about an hours drive from southern Indiana - and they DO have hills there - they may not be long, but they can get very steep and there are a lot of them!

---

Catrin, short and steep is a lot of fun to ride. You get a lot of speed going down one side, pedal if you have to, then accelerate at the bottom of the next hill and don't start shifting down until the cadence starts to fall. If you get enough speed, even if the grade is 15-18%, you can reach the top and still not be in your lowest gears, and your speed might not drop below 12 mph. It takes practice and a positive attitude about how fun it all is. If the hill is about a half mile high, you can still make it half way or more to the top before the speed really starts to drop.

I consider myself a slow cyclist, not really slow, but I have enough ascents and headwinds in any given ride that I doubt if my speed will ever be significant, plus I can't get my average cadence to go over 75, and thus my average speed falls anywhere between 13.0 and 16.5, typically between 14 and 15.5. Last month I was out on a long solo ride, on roads I know well. I turned left off of one rural road onto another rural road and about 1/4 mile down was the glimmer of a male cyclist. Since I knew the road I knew there was a nice descent, followed by a sharp hill with a steep curve, and I thought, hmm, I bet I can take the cyclist on the hill. I gained on the male cyclist by picking up the cadence, then gearing up when I reached the descent, pedaled like mad, and I got the male cyclist about a 1/3 of the way up the hill, passed him at about 16 mph. His head turned to look at me when I passed him, he saw I was a female, and he shouted, "hey you are a girl!" and then he shouted after me "I am slow because I forgot to pump up my tires." Now that was fun. You see what he did wrong, he didn't accelerate down the descent, and when he got to the bottom of the descent he saw a steep hill in front of him and he downshifted at the bottom into his lowest gear, thereby dropping his speed immediately, and when I passed him he was going maybe 4 mph. When I crested the top I was still going 11-12 mph.

Short hills are fun. Long continuous climbs are painful. And of course it is not possible to accelerate at the bottom of every short hill but with increased cycling fitness those type of short steep hills are easy to do, just slower and in a lower gear.

One of the worse sounds to hear is a "swoosh swoosh" coming up fast behind you on a hill. That happens to me. I will be on a climb and being pleased with myself, thinking wow this is the fastest I've gone up this hill, and there is that swoosh swoosh sound and it is a male cyclist coming up fast behind me and then passing me on the hill going over 20 mph, and the male cyclist is invariably a senior with gray or white hair and probably over the age of 65. But then I am not skinny and I don't ride a titanium racing bike either.

Other people can probably contribute to the hill climbing techniques. Others might have an even faster and easier way to climb the short hills than I do.

I think all of these "rules" and figures that are being quoted to Catrin might be enough to scare anyone off, even if they were just thinking about doing longer distances.
Frankly, I find the key to surviving long distances with lots of hills is to climb slowly, on purpose. I don't care if I am going 4.5 mph, because I know I will get up the hills, and I also will finish my ride not feeling like I am ready to die.
I know brevets have a time limit, but most centuries don't. But, often, I get to the end of a long, hilly ride before the people who were going up the hill faster than me, because somewhere along the way, they ran out of gas.
Catrin, I think you can do it. Increase your mileage slowly, as you plan to, experiment with your nutrition/hydration, and ride hills. And don't underestimate how much of this is mental. I never ride really long climbs at home, but I was was able to do many 5-10 mile climbs, with serious gradients on my tour, because 1) I ride lots of short steep climbs at home and 2) I knew I would have to do this, I made up my mind I would and I wouldn't even consider getting in the support van.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarcyInOregon

If you get enough speed, even if the grade is 15-18%, you can reach the top and still not be in your lowest gears, and your speed might not drop below 12 mph.... If the hill is about a half mile high, you can still make it half way or more to the top before the speed really starts to drop.

---

Me, not so much. Don't want to be discouraging, but if anything I'm over-bold on the descents. As a motorcyclist, I'm not in the least intimidated by 45 mph on the bici - that's about as fast as I get around here, given the size of myself and my local hills.

I'm slow now, but as an ex-racer, I consider myself very good at maintaining cadence and nailing shift points. But if I'm saving energy for a long ride and not hammering up the hills, I'll be in my 30x27 well before I get to the top of anything 15% or more. Plus, the steepest ones are usually the tallest, too, so the laws of physics dictate you'll only get so much benefit from the hills that lead up to it.

Catrin, it's just a matter of practice. IMO it's really too early to for you be stressing about a lot of this stuff. Get comfortable maintaining cadence and shifting smoothly in the flats and smaller hills. Get used to accelerating from a stop. The hills will come when you're ready for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OakLeaf

....Catrin, it's just a matter of practice. IMO it's really too early to for you be stressing about a lot of this stuff. Get comfortable maintaining cadence and shifting smoothly in the flats and smaller hills. Get used to accelerating from a stop. The hills will come when you're ready for them.

---

I've been focusing lately on shifting in hills - and it seems to me that the best way to learn hills is to ride in hills and focusing on figuring out shifting points ;) Am excited about all of this - any excuse to ride further/longer is a good thing :D I've also found club rides in the counties to the south of us that DO have hills, and someone sent me a map with cue sheet from another club ride that shouldn't be beyond me.

So I will focus on increasing my mileage a little each week, riding as often as I can. I want to do intervals at least once a week, and focus on shifting/pedaling smoothly. I use BMX pedals so I do have to mash a little more than someone who is clipped in, but it is working for me.

I don't get scared away by numbers, indeed they are helpful to me because they give me an idea of what I need to shoot for. I do tend to over-think things, as my trainer looses no opportunity to remind me :p

Heading out of town for the day, but hoping everyone has a great day and thanks for the advise and discussion!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OakLeaf

Me, not so much. Don't want to be discouraging, but if anything I'm over-bold on the descents. As a motorcyclist, I'm not in the least intimidated by 45 mph on the bici - that's about as fast as I get around here, given the size of myself and my local hills.

I'm slow now, but as an ex-racer, I consider myself very good at maintaining cadence and nailing shift points. But if I'm saving energy for a long ride and not hammering up the hills, I'll be in my 30x27 well before I get to the top of anything 15% or more. Plus, the steepest ones are usually the tallest, too, so the laws of physics dictate you'll only get so much benefit from the hills that lead up to it.

Catrin, it's just a matter of practice. IMO it's really too early to for you be stressing about a lot of this stuff. Get comfortable maintaining cadence and shifting smoothly in the flats and smaller hills. Get used to accelerating from a stop. The hills will come when you're ready for them.

---

Given that I've ridden in the areas that Catrin is speaking of in Southern Indiana, I'd add that, while there are exceptions, few of the hills are rollers such that you can use momentum to get up them.

Offline, I've given Catrin some a suggestion for a good area to ride that offers some good, but not horrible, climbing. That'll be a good place for her to start IMO. There are also a handful of organized rides offered throughout the year in that neck of the woods. I think it's wise to take advantage of them if you can. I don't particularly like riding in certain parts of the alone for one. For another, it's helpful to have food and water provided for you, as there are few places to stop along the way.

Catrin, check CIBA's calendar, along with the Bloomington Bicycle Club and the Bloomington Parks Department. The Parks Department offers a century (and shorter routes) called the Hoosier Hills Challenge the first weekend in October (I think) that hits many of the challenging climbs in Brown County. Depending on which brevet you set your sights on, that ride might be the best yardstick to use to see if you're ready. Beyond that, CIBA offers 5 or 6 weekend rides plus some GT rides that are hilly, some being harder and hillier than others. They're CIBA's most popular rides; I recommend them highly.

I liked what Indy noted - that you might work to get yourself up to a certain mileage level and spend some time getting used to that mileage before ramping up again.

I coach for the Death Ride (130 miles and 15,000 feet of elevation gain) for TNT, and the program I have designed builds up to about a 70 mile ride within 3 months and then spends some time at the 70 mile level before ramping up again to a series of 110 mile 10,000+ foot rides.

We build fairly gradually but only have from February to July to get this in. It works well. I note most of our riders have done a century before doing our program, but many have not and they do well also.

So you might want to build up to the 60 - 70 mile level and spend 3 weeks to a month riding at that distance just to get used to it before you increase again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by indysteel

Given that I've ridden in the areas that Catrin is speaking of in Southern Indiana, I'd add that, while there are exceptions, few of the hills are rollers such that you can use momentum to get up them.....

Catrin, check CIBA's calendar, along with the Bloomington Bicycle Club and the Bloomington Parks Department. The Parks Department offers a century (and shorter routes) called the Hoosier Hills Challenge the first weekend in October (I think) that hits many of the challenging climbs in Brown County. Depending on which brevet you set your sights on, that ride might be the best yardstick to use to see if you're ready. Beyond that, CIBA offers 5 or 6 weekend rides plus some GT rides that are hilly, some being harder and hillier than others. They're CIBA's most popular rides; I recommend them highly.

---

I hadn't thought on checking in Bloomington, that is a good idea! I have already picked some of the CIBA southern rides to check out. I will also check out the Hoosier Hills Challenge, that might be a really good idea - especially if I decide to do the November brevet in Nashville, TN rather than October in Ohio. Either way it would likely be a good idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maillotpois

I liked what Indy noted - that you might work to get yourself up to a certain mileage level and spend some time getting used to that mileage before ramping up again........So you might want to build up to the 60 - 70 mile level and spend 3 weeks to a month riding at that distance just to get used to it before you increase again.

---

I have 4 months total to prepare in, but it makes sense to do this in some way. I might not be able to spend an entire month - ideally I would like to be reach a century by October 1 and then spend the next almost 3 weeks just staying with it/getting comfy with it for the next 16 days. I think this is where it will be important to listen to my body, carefully.

I am also thinking this might be a good time to finally get that book on nutrition for cyclists that I have seen recommended elsewhere on this forum. It is probably time to start eating to sustain endurance rather than to target weight loss - currently I am only on a 1500 calorie "budget" and it is probably about time to change that. I have been known to go as high as 1700 calories on heavy days - but the definition of a "heavy day" is likely about to change :)

I think this sounds like a fantastic goal!!! It is going to be HARD, but it should also be FUN!!

My guess is that nutrition is going to one of your bigger challenges, so the book you mentioned might be a good idea, although I haven't read it. However, keep in mind that every body is different and therefore, nutrition needs differ very much from person to person. Also, as you train more and more, you will probably find your own nutrition needs changing a lot. So, you will have to read your body very carefully to determine what it needs.

Carry more food with you than you think you will need, and eat BEFORE you get hungry. Also try different sports drinks. You will probably need a good amount of electrolytes, but everyone has a different tolerance for sports drinks, so find one that doesn't upset your stomach. Another thing you could try are cliff shot blocks. I always bring them on all my rides and can do fine with plain water and shot blocks for electrolytes.

Over time, you will build a pretty strong and efficient aerobic engine. That efficiency will manifest in your ability to utilize fuel (carbs) well. However, before you get to that point (and even after) you need to be hyper-aware of how you are feeling so you don't bonk. It is NOT FUN to run out of gas miles from home!

Good luck with your training and keep us posted! I am going to live vicariously through you because I am bailing on my friends' double century next week due to having been more focused on intensity this season and so haven't had time to train for that distance :-(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chicagogal

I think this sounds like a fantastic goal!!! It is going to be HARD, but it should also be FUN!!............ Also, as you train more and more, you will probably find your own nutrition needs changing a lot. So, you will have to read your body very carefully to determine what it needs.....
Over time, you will build a pretty strong and efficient aerobic engine. That efficiency will manifest in your ability to utilize fuel (carbs) well. However, before you get to that point (and even after) you need to be hyper-aware of how you are feeling so you don't bonk. It is NOT FUN to run out of gas miles from home!

Good luck with your training and keep us posted! I am going to live vicariously through you because I am bailing on my friends' double century next week due to having been more focused on intensity this season and so haven't had time to train for that distance :-(

---

My trainer put it best I think - this is my adventure, and the training will be as much of an adventure as the actual brevet itself. In my younger years I thrived on adventures of assorted kinds :D :eek: :rolleyes: but have not had a good one in years. I seem to be aging backwards in more than one way through cycling :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maillotpois

I liked what Indy noted - that you might work to get yourself up to a certain mileage level and spend some time getting used to that mileage before ramping up again.

I coach for the Death Ride (130 miles and 15,000 feet of elevation gain) for TNT, and the program I have designed builds up to about a 70 mile ride within 3 months and then spends some time at the 70 mile level before ramping up again to a series of 110 mile 10,000+ foot rides.

We build fairly gradually but only have from February to July to get this in. It works well. I note most of our riders have done a century before doing our program, but many have not and they do well also.

So you might want to build up to the 60 - 70 mile level and spend 3 weeks to a month riding at that distance just to get used to it before you increase again.

---

I just looked up the Death Ride - WOW!!! That looks like a lot of fun...torture...errrr I meant fun :D :eek: :D

I am working out a schedule, as much as I can, of how I would like to increase my miles between now and October 1 and while I don't think I can spend an entire month at the 70 mile level, I am trying to schedule as long as I can and still give me time to ramp up the remaining 50 miles. I do not want to do heavy miles that last week or so in order to have fresh legs - but of course it all depends on how my body takes to the increasing mileage and the heat. So far so good, but I am just at the beginning.

Now I just need to get my saddle issues worked out...