For all those who would rather not be blinded by the light
To disable ads, please log-in.
Post from a local rider/blogger (http://cliftongk1.livejournal.com/117938.html)
Sure sign it's Fall
* Oct. 1st, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Distance cycling
It's not the crisp night air (there ya go Dr. C; another one to tally up.)
It's not the misting rain.
It's the dozens of people who decided to "upgrade" their lighting systems from the AA-battery powered barely-a-nightlight they previously had, to more lumens than a monster truck with a rack of KC Daylighters. I'm sure everyone's seen at least one of these clowns. Sure, more lighting makes you more noticeable when you're on the street; but do us all a favour.
- Aim your 1200 lumen quad-head ultra-widebeam symmetrical lensed retina blaster at the ground where it might do you some freakin' good!
- Turn some of them off when you're on the MUP.
Seriously, lighting of that caliber should need a licensure test before purchase. Just one question would be fine:
True/False: If a 1W LED lamp can throw 60 lux at 10m and be enough light for a rider doing a 35mph midnight descent on an unfamiliar road, you obviously need a 900 lumen system rated for 24hr MTB racing for your 3 mile commute on the Sammamish River Trail.
Answering "True" allows the rider nothing more than a pack of waterproof camping matches to light their way.
* Location:cubicle
* Mood:Still seeing spots
"My predominant feeling is one of gratitude. I have loved and been loved;I have been given much and I have given something in return...Above all, I have been a sentient being, a thinking animal, on this beautiful planet, and that in itself has been an enormous privilege and an adventure." O. Sacks