Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1

    First Mountain Bike Help

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    After test riding and months of drooling, I've narrowed it down to these two:

    -Kona Kula Lisa http://http://www.konaworld.com/08_kulalisa_w.htm
    -Gary Fisher Big Sur GS http://www.fisherbikes.com/bike/model/big-sur-gs

    Anyone with knowledge or experience on these bikes? I would appreciate any responses.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    326
    I *love* my Kona (have a more limited budget & thus a Cinder Cone). I had a (now stolen) Kona MTB before that too. They are awesome bikes. But so are Fisher bikes... Either way I think you'll be very happy, but I can't speak highly enough about Kona. I rode a Kona on the World's Most Dangerous Road in Bolivia and that pretty much sold me (though I had one before that... )

    Anne

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ft Worth, Texas
    Posts
    22
    I have a Cinder Cone too. Lots of reviews say best bang for the buck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    MD suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,832
    I'm happy with my Cinder Cone also, but I don't do really hard or technical riding.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    I think you really need to take a look at the bike geometries. They are really quite different for the two smallest sizes for each bike. The gary fisher top tube measurements are pretty long for the standover height. And the kona's top tube lenghts seem to be reasonable, but the standover height could be a little much for some who fits the top tube length.

    For example, if I were fitting myself and had to pick one of these bikes I would probably have to pick the Kona (16") on paper because the top tube length (assuming that they listed the effective top tube length) at 21.7 inches works and the standover height just barely works. The gary fisher 15" is out, but the 13" might work for me. But I really have to test ride both to see how they handled......

    The problem is that it is hard to find women-sized bikes hanging around bikes shops. But it you can find them, test ride them. If you find they fit equally well and you like the handling of both, I'd pick the one with the nicest frame because you can always upgrade components as they wear out.
    Last edited by madisongrrl; 11-17-2007 at 01:41 PM.
    Just keep pedaling.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Off eating cake.
    Posts
    1,700
    Two very different bike brands geometry-wise. Any chance you'll be able to ride them both, back-to-back, on dirt? It's probably the only way to really know what's going to work best for you. That said, I vote for the GF. Not only because I am completely biased , but also because I have found my Tass to be a very capable wee bike, both up and down hills.
    Drink coffee and do stupid things faster with more energy.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •