I would do the harder shorter one.
To disable ads, please log-in.
I'm contemplating two different 50/60 mile routes on Saturday. One is fairly flat with some rolling hills and a couple of climbs, but nothing too wild - it's 62 miles.
The other is pretty much the opposite, but with a big climb at the beginning (straight up a mountain - 6 miles - not tough, but tedious), then over some rolling hills, then a fairly steep and long decent. Much more technically challenging (this one is 52 miles).
I know I can do either, but the clincher is that I am doing a 30 miler along pretty much the same path as the first route on Sunday with a friend with whom I am matched pretty well, but she does not like that kind of distance or hills. I ride with her every Sunday, but my DH is out of town Saturday and we usually hike - so I get a chance to be on my bike twice this weekend!![]()
Either ride is very nice - which would you do?
Christine
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.
Cycle! It's Good for the Wattle; it's good for the can!
I would do the harder shorter one.
Sarah
When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.
2011 Volagi Liscio
2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes
I agree. The second shorter one will give you a change of scenery.
Yeah, that makes sense, and I do want to do more hills. Flat and long gets boring after a while...
Thanks for helping make up my mind.
Christine
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.
Cycle! It's Good for the Wattle; it's good for the can!