Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: muscle gain

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    545
    I understand that a pound is a pound is a pound, but -- serious question -- is the phrasing "muscle is heavier than fat" misleading or inaccurate? It seems accurate to me -- muscle is more dense; it takes up more space per unit of weight, which is why when you are not losing weight but you are noticing your pants getting looser, it's probably muscle gain and fat loss combined. But if I'm phrasing it in a way that sounds ignorant, I'd like to know!
    monique

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by bounceswoosh View Post
    I understand that a pound is a pound is a pound, but -- serious question -- is the phrasing "muscle is heavier than fat" misleading or inaccurate? It seems accurate to me -- muscle is more dense; it takes up more space per unit of weight, which is why when you are not losing weight but you are noticing your pants getting looser, it's probably muscle gain and fat loss combined. But if I'm phrasing it in a way that sounds ignorant, I'd like to know!

    Muscle weighs more per unit of volume than fat, which means, that for say someone who is extremely athletic and weighs like 130, with 14% body fat, 18.2 pounds of her weight will be fat, someone of the same weight, but with 30% body fat, she'll have 39 pounds of body fat, and will wear larger clothes than her more athletic counterpart.

    "muscle is heavier than fat" is inaccurate, it's more that "muscle is denser than fat" that is the case - so for the same volume, it will weigh much more than fat.

    does that make sense?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    545
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkychique View Post

    "muscle is heavier than fat" is inaccurate, it's more that "muscle is denser than fat" that is the case - so for the same volume, it will weigh much more than fat.

    does that make sense?
    Yes! Absolutely. I will make an effort to use that phrasing in the future. Much more accurate, just as succinct.
    monique

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    9,324
    BMI can be a tricky way to evaluate yourself too. I'm 5'5" and a few years ago I went and had a body fat test done alone at the Davis Sports Medicine Facility. My BF was just under 21% then, but I weighed 152 pounds - just on the edge of being okay with BMI.

    V.
    Discipline is remembering what you want.


    TandemHearts.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    3,063
    I saw it somewhere that a cubic centimeter (cc) of fat weighs 0.9 grams but a cc of lean muscle weighs 1.1 grams. (That's about a 20% difference) So, you can maintain the same weight while decreasing your volume!
    I'd rather be swimming...biking...running...and eating cheesecake...
    --===--

    2008 Cervelo P2C Tri bike
    2011 Trek Madone 5.5/Cobb V-Flow Max
    2007 Jamis Coda/Terry Liberator
    2011 Trek Mamba 29er

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •