Humm, forgive me to be skeptical, but it takes about 10 years to build an endurance athlete. The more we exercise, the more our vascular system ramifies and improves, irrigating our muscles, etc.
On one variable or another, that two-month measure may be true, but overall it's not making a lot of sense...
Regarding the 30% mesure, it sounds somewhat reasonable if one considers it week-by-week. Ex: if I have 100 "units of fitness", then after one week of break I have 70 left, then after another week off, 49, then after another week, 34, etc.
I'm pretty sure, though, that someone with a well established fitness base will recover faster than someone with only a few months of training.




Reply With Quote
. But that's not at all the same kind of fitness base as my 30-40 miles a week. If I laid off the bike for a month right now, odds are good that my max distance would drop, and my weekly distance would drop. How much? Depends on how my body responds to no exercise. And a year from now, even if I don't push distances, my body's answer would be different.
