Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    3,932
    Quote Originally Posted by sgtiger View Post
    I heard for cardiovascular health, it takes about 2 months of regular activity for an inactive person to reach the fitness(heart-wise) of someone who has exercised their whole life and vice versa.
    Humm, forgive me to be skeptical, but it takes about 10 years to build an endurance athlete. The more we exercise, the more our vascular system ramifies and improves, irrigating our muscles, etc.

    On one variable or another, that two-month measure may be true, but overall it's not making a lot of sense...

    Regarding the 30% mesure, it sounds somewhat reasonable if one considers it week-by-week. Ex: if I have 100 "units of fitness", then after one week of break I have 70 left, then after another week off, 49, then after another week, 34, etc.

    I'm pretty sure, though, that someone with a well established fitness base will recover faster than someone with only a few months of training.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vernon, British Columbia
    Posts
    2,226
    Yup, everyone is different. But I think that the three biggest factors in how much fitness you lose and how quick you regain it are:

    Just how fit were you before you had to be inactive?

    How long had you been fit?

    How inactive were you really?

    Every bit of activity helps to keep that base fitness remembered by your body, so even if your inactivity included a lot more walking or carrying things, or whatever, that helped. And the more fit you were, the more of your fitness remained despite your reduced activity. And the longer you had been fit before the inactivity, the more fit you are now....and the faster you will regain it.

    Of course, half of this is said to help me not despair over my months of little to no exercise due to a health issue. But I'm sure my gentle stretching morning yoga still helped. And walking the dog when I could. And walking to work when I could. What I found when I did get on the bike (and I was still and am still not over my illness, just feeling a lot better than I did!), as long as I went at a slower pace, riding and even climbing was still doable, and didn't really even hurt. That gave me a lot of hope!

    You'll be surprised by how much your muscles remember of what to do! But be easy on yourself about recovery time. No point killing yourself trying to do what you could do at your peak!

    Hugs and butterflies,
    ~T~
    The butterflies are within you.

    My photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsiechick/

    Buy my photos: http://www.picsiechick.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    317
    I don't think there's a hard and fast rule. If someone got a Paris-Brest-Paris randonneur to lay off the bike for a month, they'll still be able to ride most of us into the dirt after . But that's not at all the same kind of fitness base as my 30-40 miles a week. If I laid off the bike for a month right now, odds are good that my max distance would drop, and my weekly distance would drop. How much? Depends on how my body responds to no exercise. And a year from now, even if I don't push distances, my body's answer would be different.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •