Giant Bikes? Compact Sizing?

[Triskeliongirl]

I was just perusing the Giant site, and the bikes have fairly relaxed seat tube angles for commercial racing bikes. That means they might work for me. Does anyone know how to choose a size with the compact geometry. The standover heights seem low for the size. Is there anyone out there that is 5'4" with a 30.5" inseam that rides a giant? What frame size are you? Doe they have toe clip overlap? How do they handle? I am looking for a high end carbon racing frame.

[spokewench]

I ride a small Giant - I am 5'4" tall, 30 inch inseam, rather long in the waist rather than short like a lot of women. You almost don't have to worry about standover height with this bikes with the compact geometry - the top tube just doesn't get in your way when it runs down. You need to measure your top tube length and compare it to the top tube length for a Giant. This will start you in the right direction. Then go ride some bikes and talk to a dealer, they will have a good idea how the bikes fit people.

Compact frames work well for a lot of ladies, so you might try it and see. I love my Giant TCR - it is SWEET!

[Tri Girl]

I don't know how to choose a bike with the compact geometry (that's why I went to the LBS so they'd have to figure it out ).
I have an XS giant- I'm 5'3" and have a 30" inseam. I have an OCR1, and bought it with the intention of doing tris. The compact geometry is nice- and although the top tube is slanted I still manage to scratch it when I get on.
They make very nice quality bikes, IMO, and for the price you can't beat their reputation and durability!

[Tater]

I am 5'4" with a 30 inch inseam and I have a small Giant TCR cw. I love it. I don't have toe overlap and the slanting top tube isn't an issue at all. Great bike, Tiagra/105 mix, double, and rides so smooth.

[GLC1968]

I had a compact frame Specialized before I bought my Terry. I'd also ridden a few Giants when I was shopping around. My inseam is a tad shorter than your's and I was between and XS and a S but probably would have gone for the XS had I bought one.

The one thing I noticed about both the Giant and the Specialized (that was vastly different from the Terry) was that the steering was way different. The Terry almost felt squirley or 'twitchy' in comparison. Once I'd gotten used to the Terry I rode my old Specialized (I sold it to a friend) and it felt horribly sluggish. I believe this is due to the larger front fork rake. It means no toe overlap, but it affects steering (which isn't a bad thing...just different).

And I don't know about the XS Giant, but my Specialized did not have room for 2 water bottle cages in the frame and it wouldn't fit on a regular bike rack (I had to buy an extension rod) due to the small size and compact geometry.

[spokewench]

The Giant TCR is NOT slow in front! It is actually a pretty quick bike so if you are looking for a laid back bike, this is not the one for you. My small does not have toe overlap.

spoke

[ehirsch83]

I love giants, I have had two(now have a litespeed) and my mom has the ocr c3. I previously had the tcr advanced limited(great first bike!) and then I got the '04 t-mobile women's race frame.
The only thing I have to say, especially since you are shorter is to test them all out! I am almost 5'6 and was on a small and the top tube was to long for me(53.5 i think, where my new bike is 51). It fit my legs perfectly, but not my upper body.

Even though Giant says they make women specific bikes, the only size that they actually change the measurements for is the XS.

But they ride great,handle great, good product for your money.

I would definitaly suggest finding a giant dealer and stopping in

[Tri Girl]

My Giant XS can hold two water bottles (a smaller one under my seat and a larger one on the down tube). I'm riding a Cervelo tri bike now, and I'm sad that it only has room for one small bottle. I have noticed that the Cervelo steering is much looser than the Giant. It took a little while to get used to. The stability of the steering on the Giant is great (and responsive), but you adapt to what your riding anyway, and then it's all good.

And... if you decide you want a Giant XS OCR1 in blue- I'm selling mine... (I know you're going carbon tho- shameless plug! )

[Triskeliongirl]

Wow, thanks for all the great information. I am currently riding a 19" steel terry isis that I am *very happy* with the fit on, but she is heavy. I made a mistake and prior to this bike bought a 17.5" titanium isis which I am finally willing to admit to myself is simply too small, although she is light. Gosh, one feels bad when they make a $2000+ mistake......... But, then its like going in circles, the bikes with toe clip overlap handle well, the ones without are sluggish, etc. But even then, how fast the steering is can be influenced by what you are used to.......... While I like the fast steering of my terry's, I can't ride no hands either, so maybe I would like a bike with more neutral steering, I don't know. For me its further complicated by the fact that test rides are difficult since I can only ride a bike with a modified crank set. While the top tubes on the giants appear long, the seat tube angles are slack, so the reach is comparable to the specialized that have shorter top tubes and steeper seat tube angles. For me I need a slack seat tube for my long thighs. My problem is my height is all in my legs, and my arms and upper body are short. I am kicking myself that I didn't buy Isis in the 19" but they only made her for one year in titanium. I bought the 17.5" to get the slacker seat tube angle, but maybe I should have just looked for a different saddle with longer rails. As I write this, I think I really have to think hard about going custom. We have a local carbon framebuilder, Crumpton, in Austin, who has a good reputation for really working with people (which I need), but I have no idea how he does with women's bike. I am thinking of going carbon, since the goal is to have a very light go fast bike to complement my steel terry travel bike.

[RoadRaven]

The Giant TCR is NOT slow in front! It is actually a pretty quick bike so if you are looking for a laid back bike, this is not the one for you. My small does not have toe overlap.

spoke

This is my Time Trial bike... as Spoke says, its not a "slow" bike (just the rider, but working on it! )

I have recently posted this pic, but here it is for ease of access for you. My pretty Giant, 'spec'ed up for time trialling...

[Eden]

Might I suggest trying out a Ruby? I'm similar in shape to you more leg than torso and short arms - I am 5'0 with around a 28.5/29" bike inseam, stubby arms... I went for the Ruby since the 44cm frame had the shortest virtual tt measurement I could find at the time I was ready to purchase (don't think Giant had the xxsm's yet and they do tend to run long...) I love that this bike has 700c wheels, I don't find it to be sluggish or overly twitchy - it handles very much the same as my 650c wheel ti-bike and it suits my longer legs better too. I can ride no handed easily even though I switched the stem out for an 80 too...
I can't really compare it to the Giant, no experience there, but I do love my bike!
(oh and no toe overlap - but I have quite small feet....)

[GLC1968]

Spoke and Raven - are you referring to my post?

I didn't say the Giant was slow! The steering is not as 'twitchy' as the Isis (which Triskelion and I both ride) so that's why I mentioned it. The steering is more stable/easy going/predictable...I don't know the best word for it....than the Isis. But, it has nothing to do with the speed of the bike!! It's just different...that's all.

I did not mean to offend any Giant owners!!

[kabewyou]

Toe overlap was something I never really thought about until recently. I bought a new bike last month; am close to 5'6" with 32 inch inseam; was tired of trying out bikes where I felt I was on a torture rack, bought a WSD 51cm bike that felt perfect. Then panic set in when someone mentioned I had toe overlap. Did I buy something that was going to cause me to have an accident and other similar thoughts occurred. Well, I had a new pair of riding shoes with light blue tips and wore them out on my old bike for several long rides and found out that I have been riding with toe overlap for 9 years and never knew it. I suspect the brush is so light and not that frequent, but my shoe tips are evidence that I brush the wheel now and then. Personally, I love the way the bike handles, how easily I can control it and how the geometry of the bike with me allows me to really push it. I had another person tell me on my weekend ride that I had toe overlap like it was a problem. I could see where if I was riding in a velodrome it might be a problem, but in most riding situations it is really hard to have the foot in a completely forward position with the wheel angled the same way as well. Has it been a serious problem for anyone out there?

[RoadRaven]

GLC... I was replying to Spoke's comment...

I thought your comment was more about the Terry! And you said the steering on the Giant was 'different - not bad, just different'

I just wanted to reinforce the idea that a TCR is not slow... and I took no offence at all to your post!!!

[spokewench]

Spoke and Raven - are you referring to my post?

I didn't say the Giant was slow! The steering is not as 'twitchy' as the Isis (which Triskelion and I both ride) so that's why I mentioned it. The steering is more stable/easy going/predictable...I don't know the best word for it....than the Isis. But, it has nothing to do with the speed of the bike!! It's just different...that's all.

I did not mean to offend any Giant owners!!

You did not offend me, I just wanted to make sure that someone did not buy say a TCR 1 like the one I have and think it was going to be really slow up front, cause it's not. There may be faster twitchier bikes up front but the TCR up front is not a slow, raked out bike either. It was just a clarification about the handling characteristics of the bike, that is all.