Okay. So those who've listened to my ramblings know I own a Jamis Aurora and a lovely 520. I think I've decided (when I've saved up enough and made up my mind) to trade in my Aurora or sell it.

Understand the Aurora IS a nice bike. I just feel like it doesn't work for me. I feel slower on it than my 520. I blast up hills on my 520 and feel like I'm a several mph or more slower on the Aurora overall. My riding partner has noticed this as well and commented on it again, recently. I am frustrated. This is a pretty bike that functions well - but slows me down. If it were my only bike I would have no basis for comparision so I probably wouldn't be complaining (that's how life goes right) and I know I'm lucky to have two nice bikes. But If I have to choose a bike to ride - I dive for my 520.

My dilemma, I can't decide if I want to wait until Sept. and order another (hopefully in a different color) 520 - or order a LHT (I know they're kind of envogue and that is not the reason - component wise they are supposed to be slammin') I know the 520's geometry works for me. I like it. The components are good, but the saddle and other stuff (the rack) have to be replaced right off the bat. On the LHT, I've heard that the 26 inch tires (I'm short I'd need a 46cm LHT) roll slower. (It doesn't come with a rack.) I wouldn't want to be in the same predicament with a LHT as my Aurora. I could upgrade components on the Aurora - but I bought it at a "steal" and the upgrades would put it way over the base price. What do you ladies think? I value all opinions, even if I don't always agree with you - I fully respect your knowledge base. So, any thoughts?