I'm not sure where this goes, so Apparel it is :)
I have a basic Polar HRM right now, which does the OwnZone and OwnCal stuff, but has limited memory (only the last outing), and displays limited information. I use it both on my bike and running, and find it a little tedious to change zones for each one (it's all manual aside from 'low, medium, high', so I end up not changing it and it beeps at me incessantly). In order to track progress over time, I have to record everything. I really enjoy having it around, though, it keeps me in check (I tend to push myself too hard without input).
I do not have a bikeputer to track my mileage or speed on the bike, and I'm jonesin' to know how far I'm going and how fast, especially if I'm going uphill (where I lose my current cycling buddies) or am out on my own entirely. I am looking at the local cycling club's events, and I don't know if they'd be ahead of me or just my speed or if it'd be a relaxing ride, or if I should bring a buddy or go alone.
After looking around, I'm left with two options: super snazzy HRM like Polar's S625X that has running and bike-specific stuff (if I buy the attachments) and more features, or sticking with the trusty Polar basic model and just getting a bikeputer. I'm leaning toward a new HRM (I can donate my old one to my husband as he gets himself going), but the cost is enough to make me second guess myself.
Are there features I would be missing in either a HRM or in a cyclocomputer if I went with the combined model? Are the additional features of the S625X even worth the extra $$ over other models? Are there good cyclocomputers I should be investigating as a comparison?
Obviously I am an input junkie. Hopefully at some point I'll be answering as many questions as I'm asking :)
Note: Either way I'll call it bikeputer, like the femputer on the Futurama episode with the Amazon women. "Bikeputer, Bikepute!"
