Differences betweek Trek FX Bikes

Hi There!

Another newbie here with more newbie questions. So, not to be rude, first a little about myself. I'm a Mom with two children (a 13 yo daughter and a 10 yo son) and a husband. I grew up riding my bike all over the place. I love riding a bike for recreation and it must be in my blood because my family is originally from the Netherlands (although I was born in the States). I barely remember buying my last bike that I bought in my early 20s (I think) and I am in my 40s now. Over the past 10 years I have been riding a mountain bike off and on, mostly off. So, now I am ready to buy a new bike. :) I want it to ride around with my kids, but also take out for longer bike rides for exercise while they are at school.

I went to my LBS and they wanted to sell me the Trek Navigator or Trek 7100. In doing more research, I found that many people really like the Trek FX series. So today I went and test rode some more bikes, this time the FX series and compared them to the Trek 7100.

So, now my question is, I read in other posts that there is a big difference between the 7.6 FX, 7.5 FX, & 7.3 FX and that some of you use them for different purposes. What might that be? I was looking at the 7.3 FX or 7.2 FX. What would you use that for? Even the Trek website does not address this. I have read a lot of reviews that the seat is uncomfortable. Maybe I can upgrade that to a more comfortable seat. Any suggestions?

I have also read that some of you have the 7.3 FX (or what ever number) and say that it was a great starter bike. For that reason I think that I should go with the FX series and not the Trek 7100. I don't see myself as getting into racing or the need for a road bike soon. I want to buy a bike and have it last a while. If I buy a Trek 7100 I may be more likely to want to upgrade after a short time than if I were to buy a 7.3 FX. Does that make sense?

Anyway, I would love your input on anything at all.

Thanks so much,

Marianne

I have a trek wsd 7.6, I went and test rode a 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 and found a pretty big difference in them. I love the carbon fork and how light my 7.6 is, and the shock absorber under the seat makes for a very comfortable ride. I hadn't bought be bike in almost 20 years either, and I figured it might be another 20 before I did again (that's how I justified the dramatic price increase- I had been looking for something in the $500 range).

I'd test ride as many as your LBS will let you, and slowly narrow down the ones that fit you and what you are looking for the best. That's the only real way to tell the difference. I also have a string of posts on a question I asked about the trek 7.5 about a month ago. As I recall some folks chimed in on the whole series. :)

I have the 7.3 and the 7.6

The 7.6 is my "road bike".
The 7.3 would be a good commuter. I ride mine on the C&O Canal towpath.

When I was in NYC, I rented a 7.5 and rode it across town. It was great.

The 7.3 is rather heavy, if you think you're going to ride a lot I don't think this is the bike for you.

Basically, as you go higher in the series the bikes become lighter and faster and the tires get skinnier, though none would be termed a road bike.

They also become more expensive :D

Thanks GrassyRidge & Zen. Zen, I am glad you responded because it was one of your posts that stated that you use these bikes for completely diffferent reasons. I'm not sure I exactly understand what makes a bike a commuter bike except for maybe it is heavier and so you don't want to ride it as far as you would the lighter bike.

Arrggh, now I am more confused. I took my husband with me to the store to get his opinion. He prefers the 7200 over the 7.3 FX. He thinks that "for as much as I will ride it" that the weight difference is not a big deal. He thinks that it is a much more comfortable bike. I was hoping that he would lean towards the 7.3 FX like I am. I guess he doesn't have faith in me riding for exercise. :( He also doesn't like how the tires are made mainly for the road. While I won't be on the mountain, we do sometimes ride on the dirt road at the RV campground.

Confused in California

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

I took my husband with me to the store to get his opinion. He prefers the 7200 over the 7.3 FX.

---

Who's riding this bike?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

He thinks that "for as much as I will ride it" that the weight difference is not a big deal. He thinks that it is a much more comfortable bike.

---

Have you ridden both of them?
Which one do you find more comfortable?

I don't think those front shocks on the 7200 are any big deal, but that's my opinion. I am almost certain you'll prefer the trigger shifters on the FX over the twist shifters on the 7200.

The 7200 doesn't have any review on the trek site but The 7.3 did

And the weight DOES make a difference. I didn't realize it until I did a five mile ride on my old heavy mountain bike, and then did one on my new bike. I felt GREAT after the ride on the lighter bike, and totally worn out (and not in a good way) after the ride on the old one. The old bike is going to be tricked out for running errands, panniers etc. The new bike will get the long fun rides :D

I think that primary difference between the Trek 7000 series and the Trek FX series is in the geometry, i.e. how up-right you are versus how bent over and other factors. The 7000 series are more hybrids, in my option, between a mountain bike (or cruiser) and a road bike. The FX series moves more towards being a flat-bar road bike. As a newer rider, you won't have any intellectual feelings about geometry. You will just have to ride them and feel the difference, but generally as you get more serious about speed you would probably find yourself wanting the FX or an actual road bike. The 7000 will be comfortable but your torso will be very upright and you will catch a lot of wind. So really, you have to understand what you want the bike for and how serious you might get about cycling in order to decide. The 7000 and FX series are for very different purposes.

From there, the more expensive bikes in both the 7000 and FX series upgrade to nicer gear shifters (derailleurs), carbon forks that dampen rough roads, better tires, lighter wheels, etc., but those things might not be important to you.

And really, the FX 7.2 is identical to the 7.6 in geometry (someone correct me if I'm wrong here), so you are really getting the exact same bike no matter what level you decide on, it's just that the components are better and lighter on the 7.6. It's like getting a V8 engine in your car instead of a V4. The shifting will be smother, the bike will be lighter and faster but it's the exact same bike. You have to decide on the balance between your budget and the elegance of the bike.

So now I'm dilemmafied- I have a trek 7.3fx and I think it's the absolute perfect bike for me . But I want to be able to do a century in less time. I'm thinking of upgrading to the 7.6 or higher. Is the geometry the same? I was thinking I'd try trail riding and my next bike would be an entry level mountain bike. But this new knowledge about the fx series changes things.

The geometry is the same but you'll likely be faster on the 7.6. It's got narrower, slick tires and it's lighter overall.
It's gateway bike to the hard stuff:p
The 7.6 with Alivio trigger shifters, Deore front deraillerur and Tiagra rear
is as high as it gets for the WSD but you might not need that. The mens goes up to 7.9 and has a 105 front and rear. It also has a $2,619.99 price tag.

Wow, Tiagra and Deora derailleurs on a bike that costs $1200? I'd rather just buy a road bike for that price.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by carinapir

So really, you have to understand what you want the bike for and how serious you might get about cycling in order to decide. The 7000 and FX series are for very different purposes.

---

Thank you for taking the time to respond so thoroughly. I'm happy this thread got some more action. You are right about the above statement and that is why I am having a hard time making a decision. I really, really, liked the beautiful blue 7.3 FX that I test rode. I also tested the 7200. I tested about seven different bikes.

Here is the problem I am having. I initially thought I was buying a bike to ride around with my kids and envisioned a fun ride with them on a rails-to-trails trail that takes us right to my Mom's house. It would be about a 21 mile run, but I thought with a little practice the kids and I could do that. I thought it would be fun to ride there, go swimming and spend the night and come home the next day. I envisioned riding with the kids to their school, riding to the bowling alley, riding to get a frozen yogurt, etc. I even envisioned buying a dog trailer and towing my dog.

Like a good consumer I researched the bikes I tested. I came across TE (a wonderful website) and got very excited about riding in general. It is hard not to get excited when you all are so passionate about riding. Since I am on a mission to lose 40 lbs by the end of July I began thinking how I would like to ride for exercise. I started plotting routes on Bikely.com and day dreaming about riding for exercise. As great as my intentions are, just like if I were to buy a treadmill and don't use it for its intended purpose, it is a waste of money.

Other than the mountain bike that I have been riding once in awhile over the past 10 years, all of my other bikes were (like) road bikes (10 speeds). I am mostly comfortable on the 7.3 FX. I am comfortable with the slight leaning forward, but I am not comfortable about the saddle. I am really worried about not being comfortable with the small around town trips I plan on doing. If I thought the saddle would be comfortable I would buy the FX in a heartbeat.

Another personal issue that I am having is that I don't really care for the look of the 7200 and the good reviews are mostly from beginning cyclists and 60 year old men. Seriously, I have nothing against beginning cyclists or 60 year old men and I value their opinion, but I would rather have an opinion from an avid cyclist who has experience.

From the picture I think the 7500 looks nice. I haven't tested it or know anything about it. I can only assume it is way more than I wanted to spend, but I might be willing to spend it if I think it is a bike that will last me. Maybe I should look at bikes other than Trek.

I'm sorry this message got to be so long. I am really frustrated now and can't make a decision. I go to bed thinking about bikes and I wake up thinking about them.

Confused in CA
Marianne

It's rare to find anyone who likes a Bontrager saddle.
That'll be the next thing you spend hours researching ;)
You heard it here first.
you think you're confused now:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

If I thought the saddle would be comfortable I would buy the FX in a heartbeat.

---

So buy the FX and replace the saddle! Sounds to me you already know which bike has stolen your heart. Everything else is just trying to justify it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

Another personal issue that I am having is that I don't really care for the look of the 7200

---

I could never, ever, ever buy a bike that I didn't like the look of. I'd resent even looking in its general direction and I'd never want to ride it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

Maybe I should look at bikes other than Trek.

---

Maybe you should! I looked for a new bike for months before finally deciding on the Cannondale. It was originally a brand (and model) I'd decided against, but after riding it, it totally stole my heart (and with it, all rational thought related to budget).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

I go to bed thinking about bikes and I wake up thinking about them.

---

I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this.. but it will only get worse. You're on a slippery slope, my dear! Buying the bike of your dreams is just the start. Once you've got the bike, your dreams will be filled with rides on the new steed. Then, you'll wake up one day and realise the new steed needs new tyres, or maybe an updated doodad or better widget. Just embrace it, it's easier that way :D

Max

Saddles are a very personal choice and I never keep the saddle that comes with my bikes. That definitely shouldn't stop you from buying the FX if you like everything else about it IMHO.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zen

The geometry is the same but you'll likely be faster on the 7.6. It's got narrower, slick tires and it's lighter overall.
It's gateway bike to the hard stuff:p
The 7.6 with Alivio trigger shifters, Deore front deraillerur and Tiagra rear
is as high as it gets for the WSD but you might not need that. The mens goes up to 7.9 and has a 105 front and rear. It also has a $2,619.99 price tag.

---

I don't need wsd, but the frame size I have fits my legs nicely, and because my torso is shorter that a man's, I seem to be fitted to the bike in a more aggressive position, more downwards than I've seen a lot of people on hybrid bikes. It works real well for me, and that's why I think I might want to upgrade to the same bike but lighter weight with a few more technical parts. I don't think I can spend $2000 or more, it will be a stretch for me to spend the $1200 or so that the 7.6 costs. But I am all sorts of excited about the option of having a new and improved version of the bike I love so much!

+1 on the just swap out the saddle on the FX as it seems like you really like that bike. It should be super easy to do that yourself but usually the bike shop would do it for free if you buy a new saddle at the same time. They might even do it free after the fact too. The 7000 series is more of a comfort bike, like a high, high end cruiser. They have really wide tires.

You might want to try out the Giant hybrids too which are called Dash in the women's version. They are basically equivalent to the Trek FX line. I happen to be a Giant fan and I ride a FCR3 which is an older version of the Dash. I use it as a "fitness" bike to exercise and I sometimes commute on it. It's comfortable (enough for me anyway) and I can almost keep up with roadies on it. :-)

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!!! THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! I feel so uplifted today. I have finally made my decision on which bike I am going to purchase. Tomorrow I am going to buy the beautiful blue 7.3 FX that I can't stop thinking about. I made my decision last night, but did not tell DH until this morning. He likes the look better too and seemed happy that I made a decision.

I figured that since I was having my immature baby attitude that "if I don't get the bike I like then I just don't want a bike" than I should just get the bike I like. From the sound of it, the saddle thing will work out one way or another. I'm going to buy it with the saddle it comes with because I am just assuming I am not going to like it, so I will give it a try. Maybe it won't be a problem for me. If it is, I will buy a new one.

Yay me!

Marianne (no longer confused LOL!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhami

I'm going to buy it with the saddle it comes with because I am just assuming I am not going to like it, so I will give it a try. Maybe it won't be a problem for me. If it is, I will buy a new one.

Yay me!

Marianne (no longer confused LOL!)

---

I read this a lot on this board :rolleyes: seems as if for most Trek riders the first/only thing that must go is the &^%, *(@# saddle the bike comes with.

Your LBS should offer to swap/replace with a saddle that will be "love at first sit".

Happy Thanksgiving and congratulations on your purchase decision. Many happy miles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trek420

I read this a lot on this board :rolleyes: seems as if for most Trek riders the first/only thing that must go is the &^%, *(@# saddle the bike comes with.

Your LBS should offer to swap/replace with a saddle that will be "love at first sit".

---

Maybe give the "Bontrager H1" a try first.

I test rode one at the Trek dealer and it's a *lot* different than the old Bontrager saddles people seem to dislike. It's wider, flatter across the back, and has a nice deep recess in the middle at just the right width and position for me. All these features combine to either lift my pelvis (by the sit bones) or drop the middle of the saddle away from my pubic bone, all good things for saddle comfort for me.

Maybe someone at Bontrager has started to figure out how to make more comfortable saddles? (Woman product manager perhaps??)

I am going to show my lack of knowledge here, but I have to ask. The FX 7.6 - would this be a good choice for both roads, bike trails, and a prepared surfaces such as a canal tow path? I understand that the FX series isn't exactly a road bike, but somewhere in-between a hybrid and a road bike. Is my understanding right here?

I am still nervous about the idea of a non-low-step design :eek: and this is more expensive than the 7300, but I figure that I should get as much bike as I can afford to prevent "growing out" of it the first summer... It feels like March will never get here, it is like being a child waiting for Christmas!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

The FX 7.6 - would this be a good choice for both roads, bike trails, and a prepared surfaces such as a canal tow path?

---

Yep, it should be fine. My SO & I ride our road bikes (compete with skinny 23mm tires!) on a canal towpath sometimes (when visiting the Chicago burbs). It's crushed limestone, and it's about the limit for how rough a surface I'd happily ride with those tires. An FX (even the 7.6) would be super easy for us there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dianne_1234

Yep, it should be fine. My SO & I ride our road bikes (compete with skinny 23mm tires!) on a canal towpath sometimes (when visiting the Chicago burbs). It's crushed limestone, and it's about the limit for how rough a surface I'd happily ride with those tires. An FX (even the 7.6) would be super easy for us there.

---

Thanks for your experience with this. What is the main difference between the 7.5 and 7.6? Weight?

My LBS has a couple of 2006 Trek 7.6 WSD bikes in stock - and at a significant savings over the 2009 and 2010 models. He said there are few differences between them. When I compared the specs at the Trek website, of course a lot of the components are different. I do not know enough, however, to know of those different components are significantly different.

If I wait until their March sale, then I can get the 2010 model at a significant savings... but I can get the 2006 model now at an even better price. I don't want to do something that I will regret though - does anyone here have experience with the 2006 and later versions of this bicycle? Right now I am leaning in the direction of waiting, but this deserves consideration.

- Update - my cycling "guy" is going to look at the components and give me his opinion on the 2006 version of the 7.6 wsd. I am inclined to wait until March and take advantage of the sale to get the 2010 model - unless he finds no difference between the two. I think that his advice will be the same, but time will tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

Thanks for your experience with this. What is the main difference between the 7.5 and 7.6? Weight?

---

To be honest I'm not sure of the detail differences; I'm just looking at the tire width to judge trail-friendliness. ;-)

It seems to me most of the FX bikes share the same mission: similar riding position, similar tire dimensions, similar gearing, etc. Just some are "nicer" (= lighter, more presitigious & durable components, etc.). It seems several models even share the same frame, just the components are upgraded.

When I bought my FX I wanted a chain guard, which made it easy - at the time only a few models had cranks with integrated guards, and between the size I wanted and the stock on hand I had no choice. Which in hind sight might have been a good thing - I bought my bike and started enjoying it immediately!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catrin

My LBS has a couple of 2006 Trek 7.6 WSD bikes in stock - and at a significant savings over the 2009 and 2010 models.

...Right now I am leaning in the direction of waiting

---

Only you can judge what's "worth" it to you.

My personal tendency is to select from what's available "now"; future promises don't yet exist. I've sometimes waited to buy, hoping for a better deal or components or whatever, sometimes to find the new one is more money, isn't that much better, and in the mean time the one I was considering has been sold!

You can wait "forever" for a better widget (deal, color, price, whatever).

I made up my mind :) I will wait until March and get the 2010 model on sale - it is the best bike for the money AND I will be able to get it for less than I can currently get a 2009. I had a heart-to-heart talk with the purchasing manager of my LBS.

The 2006 model doesn't have as many gears, and I really have to save up for it anyway... I am as excited as a kid though - am really looking forward to getting my first bike. Hopefully the weather this winter won't be so bad that I can't meet with my bike riding instructor a few times to get a little practice in. I did NOT learn how to ride as a child...