Rant -- "Bank Drive-thru is for motorized vehicles only!"
So, on my way to run other errands this afternoon, I stopped by the bank to make a deposit. Of course, I went through the drivethrough. There was only one other car (there are two tellers), and no lines. They took forever to process my order, which I couldn't understand, given how few customers were there... until the teller said, through the PA, "Liza, next time you come, you're going to have to use the lobby." I said "what?" and she said, "you can't bring your bike in the drivethrough." Of course, I am terrible at coming up with a quick reply that is at all articulate or convincing when I'm flustered, so I said, "but that doesn't make any sense!". Another woman comes over and says, "i'll explain. you can't take your bike through the drivethrough." Thanks, that was a much better explanation, I didn't get that before!!! I said nothing but looked indignant, and she said, "the drivethrough is for motorized vehicles only." I didn't feel like arguing and also didn't think it was a battle that would be won talking over the speaker system, so I just said "OK" and left.
But seriously, I tried to think through the rationale for this policy and I really can't come up with a good argument why bikes shouldn't be permitted.
--I am no slower than a car would be in the drivethrough.
--I can hold a line and follow traffic rules just as well as a car can.
--I am just as visible to other cars as a car would be, in that setting.
--Like cars, I entered via traffic and will exit via traffic. They only offer this service to cars because it is more convenient not to have to find a parking spot and get out of the car -- but hey, if I'm on a bike, why don't I deserve the same convenience? Like cars, I was on my way to run other errands, so I wanted to be as efficient as possible.
Has this happened to anyone else? Has anyone heard a plausible argument for it? I am not denying that there could be a plausible argument, but they didn't give me one and I'm having a hard time coming up with one.
I am partly tempted to write the bank a letter explaining in a more articulate fashion why I think they should reconsider this policy, but I probably won't because I imagine it will be discounted as some crazy rant.
Arrghhh. It miffed me.
I've researched the issue...
Since it's not an issue at my bank (because we offer walk-ups and bike racks), I had to research the issue a bit more.
Insurance policies do not generally address bicycles specifically.
However, they have general provisions to mitigate avoidable hazards.
While we are focused on the hazard associated with cars in the queue, the actual perceived hazard in drive throughs is OIL...It was interesting that the hazard is perceived by the insurers as being equal to walk-ups, and any two wheeled vehicles - including motorcycles.
Interestingly, we would serve someone who walked/rode up to the drive through...but we have a very regular clean-up program for oil in the lane;) We're also the first in the entire city to have the sidewalks cleared of snow in the winter:D
So, that's the rest of the story. It is insurance driven in a general sense...but more driven by laziness in cleaning up the oil...