Printable View
I just got my An-Atomica on my bike. I LOVE it! For the first time I understand what they mean by "it just sort of goes away after a while." It really does. It is soft like a sling, but supportive in a nice way. I tilt mine down a touch to avoid pressure on my pubic bone and such. It is really nice! i had a brooks B17 for 5 minutes, but it was way too hard on the girlie bits. i hated it, good saddle, not for me. I would really suggest one to the rider looking for comfort.
I have this saddle and two of my main riding buddies have this saddle also.
And all three of us are different weights and shapes.
It is a great saddle for distance. I can ride for miles each week and not be thinking about the saddle.
Darcy
I had a discussion with Brian, my LBS guy, about the SAA compared to the Brooks. He thought they were of similar caliber but that the Selle had an extra construction component of carbon. And it has a cutout.
He explained it a lot better that I just did, maybe someone else can help.
What is the width of the saddle at its widest point?
It's increasingly tempting for me to try it...
I have the Clydesdale version, as does another riding friend. However, the third riding buddy has the regular version, and it appears to be the same size as the Clydesdale. Thus, on my saddle, the greatest width is about 6 7/8". However, I estimate the actual sit-bone area to be 5 3/4" to 6".
I only had to make one adjustment on the saddle after installing it, and that is I moved the saddle back 1/2". The other cycling buddies made more adjustments than I did and are real happy with the results.
Darcy
i love my brooks B17. comfortable right out of the box, and getting more so as the miles roll by. i tilted the nose slightly up to accommodate my riding position and it's been perfect since. never had trouble with bits or booty bashing.
cut-outs don't work well for me.
just goes to show, one saddle does not fit all. :)
I think Clydesdale has more to do with how the leather is treated than it does with the size...it is primed for a heavier body....same size...
I'm going to post my other remarks in a new thread...:p
I also didn't like the B17, but of course, the B67 is on all my bikes and it's not only comfortable, but beautiful too. I am glad to hear about women who are having good luck with the An-atomica saddle. My husband has one and he loves it.
Hi all - I am interested in the An-Atomica saddle and have looked at their website but I can't make heads or tails out of it. I understand they have women's specific saddles but could not find any listed. Any help y'all could give me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
This is the first I'd heard there were women-specific saddles. I met the maker of these things and he had a one size fits all attitude. he said something like 85% of his customers liked one size, so that's what he makes.
I think they only make them in widths. I wrote them recently.
You can write and tell him what you want and he'll help you.
The Selle A. do not make any saddles even remotely wide enough for my "Brooks B68-worthy" sitbones. ;)
Ditto. (but put in "Brooks B67 worthy sitbones")
I have luscious hips...
i guess what we really need is an official Brooks saddle thread.
There's an article in the Bicycle Quarterly that talks about the kinds of saddles and bikes that people road in the 1200 kilometer Paris Brest Paris ride. Fully 50% of the people that responded had Brooks or the selle an-atomica saddles on their bikes. Further, a majority of the faster and more experienced riders had leather saddles.
And most of the riders rode STEEL BIKES!
Mimi, were most of the riders French?
most of the survey respondents were americans. but i think other than the French, americans were the largest single group.
50% used a traditional leather saddle such as a Brooks or SA. I didn't see where it said that the faster or experienced riders used leather saddles either, just that 55% of the 90 hr group used traditional leather and 37% of the faster group did. The charts are confusing but I think I'm reading it right. Matter of fact the article said " no dignificant differences in equipment choices or DNF rates between novice and experienced randonneurs." Users of '"other" saddles, mostly gel, were almost twice as like to DNF. However, few of these riders listed saddle problems as the reason for abandoning the ride."Quote:
Originally Posted by mimitabby
And the survey was conducted through RUSA bulletin boards so the analysis was of equipment used by RUSA members.
Nice Sadie Kate, you missed my point. There's a huge percentage of people on that ride who were riding leather saddles. That's all I was saying. and then you provided the other interesting statistic; the non-leather saddle people were more apt to DNF.
:rolleyes:No, truthfully, Mimi, I didn't see this part about the faster and more experienced. Where is it? I sometimes have a hard time following Jan. He needs an editor for himself and some of his contributors.:rolleyes: I constantly have to re-read a paragraph trying to piece together the progression of logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by mimitabby
Back to topic: I just tried out my new An-Atomica today and I love it! I had two Brooks; the Team Pro and the Team Pro S and although I liked them, I was never able to get comfy.
I'd like to try the An- Atomica saddle but have concerns about the durablity of it compared to the Sella Italia gel flow saddle. My problem is I sweat a great deal and the surface of my gel flow saddle degrades and a hole will wear thru the saddle... Does anyone know if the An- Atomica saddle will hold up well after biking in hot sweaty summers? I have to replace my gel flow saddle after one year of use and it becomes expensive to do this year after year. I'm happy with the fit of my present saddle but don't want to keep purchasing new saddles yearly.. thanks
Just got my new An-atomica. I think I'm in love. Apart from being the most comfortable saddle I've sat on by far, it's so beautiful. It has a shaker-like simple beauty, nothing there that doesn't serve a purpose. It definitely looks handmade. I got the red one, what a surprise :p!
As I sat on it, my sit-bones made contact, and the rest of it disappeared. I felt nothing between my legs, and the pain I often get on the ouside of my right hip didn't come. I know now I was sitting on my perineum on my old saddle, and it was too wide, which gave me a lovely hematoma which would recur after long rides.
I hope it will last a long time. It's made of a weather proof leather that doesn't need conditioning. I'll let you know in the summer how it's holding up.
I just saw this- I don't know if you got one, but I wanted to add that I had two an-atomicas. I thought they were definately the most comfortable thing I've ridden on, but within a couple of months, both stretched to the point of being at the end of the tensioning bolt and then began to chafe because I couldn't tension them any more and they continued to stretch. I'm well under the weight limit to where they recommend getting the clydesdale model, and I cared for the saddle according to the manufacturer's recommendation.Quote:
Originally Posted by lattae
I'm currently on the lookout for something that's just as comfortable but more durable (Brooks didn't work because I need a cutout).
Did you contact the manufacturer? My husband has one and has at least 10,000 miles on it with no problem.. SO maybe they can be replaced?
The 2nd one was a warranty replacement for the 1st. I decided not to get it replaced again because I will be racing in some NRC races this year, and the saddle is very long. It violates the UCI saddle rules by both being over 27.5cm long and by the nose being too far over the BB.