Got the exercise part. Can't get the eat less part.
Hi, everyone. I love these forums -- so supportive and it's nice that it's just us gals.
My name is Susie, and I've been a recreational rider off and on for a couple of years. I didn't do much riding this year, and I'm starting to build a foundation for next year.
I need to lose a lot of weight. My goals are all fitness oriented (finish a sprint triathlon in under 2 hours, jog a 5K in under 40 minutes, finish a half-century bike ride, commute to work 3x/week starting in the spring). I watch what I eat, and the hope was that the weight would come off by choosing healthier foods, better portions and exercising.
But I find I'm so HUNGRY all the time, despite choosing whole grains, vegetables and good proteins. For example, I'll eat a big salad at lunch with veggies and chicken, and be STARVING an hour later. I'll wait another hour, then eat an apple and low-fat yogurt, and I'm starving an hour after that. I'm eating roughly 1,500 to 1,800 calories/day.
I'm curious to see a breakdown of what you eat during the day (and especially your lower volume days or rest days). Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I do eat 5 meals/snacks a day and try to keep it varied.
And, to add a completely unrelated rant, why is it that cycling clothing manufacturers don't make women's XXL bike shorts? I currently use men's shorts, but the ... ahem ... parts are different.
My motto - Nothing tastes as good as thin feels
I've lost 25 pounds and will be thin when I lose another 15---I ditto every thing Grog said....take a look at this website: www. dietfacts.com . It will give you the calorie counts for food at your favorite restaurants. A super sized lunch at McDonalds is well over 2000 calories, more cals. that I should consume in one day!!!
When I'm in my weight loss mode I can usually lose a pound a week if I keep my calories at 1100-1200 per day. I have a food journal and I list every food and the calories for that food that I eat for the day. So if I have a big lunch I know that I have to go lighter at dinner. It keeps me accountable. I have a digital scale that weights the food, and when I punch in a food code that gives me calories for that portion. I think Salter makes it, I got mine at Linens and Things. Without that scale, I ALWAYS underestimate the true calorie count.
It sounds like alot of work, but when you get into the habit, it's really ok.
Knowing what to do vs actually doing it
I see this problem with a lot of my clients...i get the "i know what i SHOULD be doing - i just don't do it!"
I too was like that for a long time. Its all a matter of recognizing the self talk when it happens (many of us don't).
We talk ourselves out of our workout ("i'll go tomorrow", "what's the point?" etc etc).
when we start talking ourselves OUT of something you must ask yourself
1) will this decision affect my health or wellbeing?
2) Will i be proud of this decision, or will it be something i try and hide?
3) will this decision prevent me from reaching my goal?
you also have to think the following way (or start to) - HOW MUCH DO YOU WANT TO REACH YOUR GOAL?
My brother in law has skin problems and wants to get into this study that is testing some kind of cream to heal it. He was assessed and was told to lose some weight. One of his problems is red wine. He drinks a lot of it. and he eats a lot of fatty foods. He was complaining to me one day, about the size of servings and how he NEEDS a bigger class of wine (his wife serves him up 1/2 a cup instead of his usually 2-3). I tell him this - how important is it to him to make it into the study and potentially get help for his skin problem. Or is it more important to drink wine.
Some food for thought (pardon the pun) :rolleyes:
Smile
Hannah
more on what influences our eating...
this is an interesting read:
Sports Nutrition: Sheila’s Nutrition Digest Vol. 9: Food Psychology - What is controlling your eating?
By Sheila Kealey
September 2005
In this new series, XC Ottawa (and OAC Racing Team) member Sheila Kealey will help athletes choose the best foods for performance and overall health. Sheila has a Masters in Public Health and works in the field of nutritional epidemiology as a Research Associate with the University of California, San Diego.
Have you finished a bag of chips when you only wanted a few? Do you eat only when you are hungry? If physiological cues were the sole determinants of our eating habits, the nation’s obesity and health statistics would look quite different! Ubiquitous food marketing and advertising make it obvious that many other factors have a huge impact on what we eat and how much we eat.
Brian Wansink, PhD, is a researcher who is passionate about figuring out how cues that aren’t related to hunger influence our eating habits. Dr. Wansink wants to use this information to help us control how much we eat and choose nutritious foods, which contrasts the food industry’s single minded goal of encouraging us to eat more of their product. As professor of Marketing and Nutritional Science, and the director of the University of Illinois' Food and Brand Lab, he has conducted over 100 studies looking at eating behavior.
Through lab experiments, hidden cameras, in-depth interviews, and consumer panels, his work has revealed some fascinating information about how environmental cues influence what we eat. Here’s what we can learn from some of his findings:
Beware of Package Size
BIG packages encourage us to eat more, even when the food isn’t great.
When Wansink gave moviegoers popcorn in large-sized buckets, they ate almost 50% more than those served popcorn in smaller buckets. Both groups estimated that they’d eaten the same amount of popcorn. Were they overeating because the popcorn tasted so good? Not likely – the test subjects were munching on stale, 14-day-old popcorn, showing how automatic some behaviors become, and how package size has a powerful influence over the amount we eat.
In another series of studies, Wansink looked at consumption of 47 different grocery store products and found that people generally poured more out of larger packages than smaller ones.
Make it work for you: If you’re concerned about reducing your caloric intake, opt for small plates and bowls at home, and be aware of the sizes of containers and plates when eating out. Select large packages of foods you want to eat more of (e.g., those big bags of salad greens), and small packages of foods that you are trying to limit.
Out of Sight, Out of Mind
Ease temptation by putting unhealthy foods out of sight
We’re likely to eat more candies if the candy bowl is on our desk rather than just 6 feet away. Wansink studied the behavior of secretaries, and found that they consumed 50% more Hershey’s kisses when they were within arm’s reach as opposed to a few steps away. The type of bowl influenced consumption too: people ate more candy if the bowl was clear and they could see the candy, than when an opaque bowl stored the candy. They found that the same applied to healthy foods – for example, people ate more carrots when they were directly in front of them than when they had to get up to eat them.
Make it work for you: Surround yourself with healthful foods. At parties, you’re better off within arm’s reach of the vegetable platter than the chip bowl. Keep unhealthy foods out of sight, or don’t bring them home from the supermarket in the first place. As nutrition expert Dr. Marion Nestle has said: “If you resist it at the grocery store, you only have to resist it once. If you take it home, you have to resist it every hour of every day.”
We Eat with Our Eyes
The more we see, the more we eat.
Wansink’s group designed a clever experiment to show the powerful influence visual clues exert on how much food we eat. They rigged up a self-refilling soup bowl (a “bottomless” bowl where soup refilled from a hidden hose at the bottom of the bowl connected to a pot of soup). Unsuspecting college students who ate their soup from the self-refilling bowls ate 73% more soup than those eating from normal bowls, but both groups reported the same degree of “fullness.” This study shows we often use visual cues, like the amount of food left in a bowl or on a plate, to figure out when to stop eating, rather than relying on feelings of fullness.
Make it work for you: Don’t feel you have to “clean your plate,” but try to become more aware of adequate portion sizes and feelings of fullness to figure out when to stop eating.
Optical Illusions
We perceive that tall, slender glasses hold more liquid than short, wide glasses.
Wansink conducted studies showing that visual illusions cause us to pour more and consequently drink more when we use short, fat glasses. Researchers gave people either tall, slender 22 oz. glasses or short, wide 22 oz. glasses. People poured about one third more liquid into the short, wide glasses than the tall, slender glasses, although they thought they poured less into the short glass. In another study, Wansink showed that even bartenders were susceptible to this vertical-horizontal illusion, pouring about 28% more alcohol into tumblers than highball glasses.
Make it work for you: Pay attention to the glass shape: since short, wide glasses encourage us to drink more, use these for beverages that you want to consume more of, and save tall, slender glasses for beverages that you want to limit.
Variety Makes Us Eat More
Many studies suggest that being presented with a variety of foods makes us eat more. Wansink examined this phenomenon with M&M’s. He compared eating patterns of bowls containing ten M&M colours vs. bowls containing seven M&M colours. People ate 25-30 percent more M&M’s out of the bowl with ten colours compared to the bowl with seven colours, even though all M&M’s taste the same.
Make it work for you. Look for variety in healthful foods, since a variety of nutrients is the foundation of a healthful diet. For example, you will likely eat more vegetables if you are presented with a combination of colourful options rather than one type of vegetable. Eating this variety ensures that you’ll benefit from more protective nutrients that are important for good health. Also, recent research has demonstrated that nutrients from different foods may interact to provide extra health benefits, suggesting that that your diet is more than the sum of its parts.
Our Expectations Influence Our Taste Buds
People eat more when a food has an enticing, creative description rather than a plain name.
Even when two foods are identical, people rate the food with the most descriptive name as tasting better. Descriptive menu-item labels can increase food sales and improve attitudes customers have towards the food and the restaurant, according to Wansink’s research. For example, “New York Style Cheesecake with Godiva Sauce” got better ratings than a simple “Cheesecake,” though both were identical. People even indicated they’d be willing to pay almost 10% more for a descriptive menu item. Wansink believes that associations that evoke positive memories or emotions like nostalgia, locations, or sensory descriptions will influence our perception. What would you choose: Grandma’s Famous Sugar Cookies or Sugar Cookies? Tuscan Sun-Kissed Breast of Chicken or Chicken Breast?
Make it Work For You: Don’t be fooled by descriptive labels at the supermarket – and you won’t have to look far to find many good examples creative and enticing names! At home, present your healthful dishes with great names, and your guests may find them more satisfying!
Be Aware!
Since most of us can feel hunger and already have a general idea of nutritious foods to eat, being more aware of other powerful influences on our food choices can go a long way to help us adopt a nutritious diet.