What's your vote? And, of course, add your reasons if you would like!
I thinking of surprising Bubba with tickets. He loves sci-fi and Sigourney Weaver.
Printable View
What's your vote? And, of course, add your reasons if you would like!
I thinking of surprising Bubba with tickets. He loves sci-fi and Sigourney Weaver.
3D is our plan. It's at the IMAX here. I can't wait! And Lise just raved about seeing it in 3D, so that just confirmed it. It looks pretty gorgeous. I'm such a sci fi weenie.
What you takin' for that cold? That was so fast, my head is still spinning!
Shucks, that just means my lazy butt was right here at the computer when you posted, instead of doing any number of more virtuous things. :p
I saw the movie in 3-D. My opinion? Move over, George Lucas, there is a new boy in town - James Cameron. It was fantastic. Go see it. Now. :D
If you see it in 3D do you have to wear the funky glasses?
We're going on Christmas night, as is our tradition.
Karen
I haven't seen it yet, but from everything I'm hearing, IMAX is way better than the regular 3-D.
Tucker, not sure how long it's been since you've seen a 3D movie, but the way they do it now is with polarization, not red/blue. So yeah, you do have to wear glasses, but most theaters have reusable ones that fit like funky sunglasses (supposedly sanitized after each use, but not a bad idea to bring sanitizing wipes...).
3D only works if you have two eyes in focus.... :(
I haven't answered the poll because we were debating this very thing this past weekend ourselves. I'll be curious to see what the consensus is!
Personally, I'm leaning away from 3D because it always gives me a nasty headache. I've only experienced it in short flicks at theme parks and such, but I can't imagine how a full length feature film will affect me. Perhaps this is why?...
Is this true for the new 3D stuff as well (the non-red/blue)?
Edited to add: YES, I just did the research and apparently it does matter. That explains the headaches. I can see 3D - it's just difficult for me. Since there is NO WAY I'm going to bother correcting my distance vision at this late in the game, I guess I'll be seeing Avatar in regular!
I've seen that it's PG-13, but I'm not sure what that means. Graphic sex scenes? Violence? Language? I'd like to take my 11-year-old daughter because she loves fantasy stuff, but I don't want to take her to something inappropriate.
I also want to go see Sherlock Holmes, but just the commercials for that seem a bit inappropriate to me (the scene of him tied up in bed with a pillow in front of him) -- DD was embarrassed to see that in the previews at New Moon.
Roxy
The poll needs another option.
Wait for the DVD.
I know, I know it's probably really cool and all that, but I've got a really nice home theater, can watch movies in my jammies, in HD on the large flat screen, and am not captive to commercials while waiting for the main feature. I really get bent out of shape paying good money and being subjected to advertising.
I.
I think the last movie I saw in 3D might have been "Captain EO" with Michael Jackson. :D
So yeah, it's been a long time.
My bf really wants to see this in the theater in 3D though. So we probably will.
Normally, I'd totally agree with you because, for one thing, I make better popcorn, but:
1) there are some movies which need the big screen. For instance, to this day, I regret not seeing "Dancing with Wolves" on the big screen. Big Sky Country requires a big screen. The spacecraft in the first Star Wars produces such low Hertz and is so big, it absolutely needs to fly "over your head" for maximum effect.
2) Date night: I think Bill and I went to a movie theater maybe twice in 20-some years. In the couple of years since we moved here, we've gone to the movies a couple of times and it's been fun. Just a new change of pace for us.
3) Respite from the heat during a mtb vacation: If you have to be in southern Utah in the summer, go ride at 6 am, take a shower and then go to the movies.
4) And lastly, if you do want to see it in 3D, you have to go to the theater (unless you're Donald Trump, maybe).