And get your colonoscopy in the photo department :D
And get your colonoscopy in the photo department :D
Just look for the stirrups.
Ow, I'm laughing so hard my throat hurts.
You ladies are cracking me up!!
:D:D
OK, fess up. Who here writes for Colbert?
Hee hee.:D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Trek420
Oh god Kyl rounds up to the nearest 90%. HAahahahaha! I love Colbert :D
My good friend, who is an ob-gyn physician's assistant and midwife in AZ sent me a copy of this. It really is hysterically funny, but then kind of sobering when I think of the fact she has to work in a place where people actually think like that.
She worked at Planned Parenthood when our kids were babies/toddlers.
Even though they backed off, they have shown their true colors and I will never give them another sent. I made a donation to Planned Parenthood, and there are other breast cancer organizations to support who are not guided by politics. You can also give money directly to medical centers' breast health department. UCSF has an amazing team doing great research and care in breast cancer. So does MD Anderson. There, the money isn't going to advertising or to politics.
Last night I ordered new Roadid. When you order Roadid generously make a charitable donation to your choice of one of several charities. One of the options is Susan B Komen so I picked another one.
In the comments section I thanked them for their charity drive and for supporting the fight against cancers but asked them to please consider another of the many breast cancer charities out there. I should have added a link to this thread "see how many women cyclists, runners, athletes who may agree :cool:"
Karen Handel resigned. She should have been ousted. http://www.startribune.com/nation/138851499.html.
Why it isn't enough (and why she wasn't ousted) http://motherjones.com/politics/2012...ned-parenthood
That article also explains where the 24% came from. While Komen may be able to honestly claim that 80% goes to programming, critics point out that only 24% goes to research, and only 15% to breast cancer PREVENTION. This holds true with my experience, but not just for Komen, other agencies as well. My Komen postdoctoral fellowship focused on treating hot flashes in breast cancer survivors (who can't take estrogen, the usual treatment for hot flashes). I was unable to get funded a breast cancer prevention project, from any foundation. (AICR is big on prevention, and NIH...well, let's not talk about NIH. I would probably have eventually gotten it funded if I'd had enough time to keep resubmitting.)Quote:
Originally Posted by OakLeaf
I don't have a problem with agencies like Komen spending money on programming that isn't research. Livestrong had some controversy lately because they specifically don't fund research, and haven't funded it for several years. There is a legitimate need for other programs, like getting help for people who have cancer now. Sort of like a higher impact public health effort would involve plumbing and clean water, not breast cancer surgeons.
I won't be volunteering to serve on a Komen study section, anyway.
I don't believe for a minute that their motivation to help current cancer patients is for the "greater good". Cancer diagnosis and treatment is a huge profit center for pharmaceutical companies and diagnostic equipment companies. Many of those companies are primary contributors to non-profit cancer organizations while the contributions are often shielded from public view by running the contributions through other, benevolent-sounding, front organizations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Melalvai
If Susan G. Komen and other, huge, "anti-cancer non-profits" were to actually contribute to total cancer prevention, they would put themselves and many of their contributors out of business. Funding diagnostics and current cancer care, rather than funding research into preventing cancer, is all about not biting the hands that feed these non-profits.
Robyn O'Brien wrote an interesting book titled "The Unhealthy Truth". The book is primarily about the corruption of our food supply for profit but she also delves into the unscrupulous connections between for-profit organizations and non-profits and how for-profit contributions influence the primary objectives and public messages of non-profit organizations. The book was a big eye-opener for me about the hidden motives behind many of these non-profit organizations.
Excellent article, thank you for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by OakLeaf
Ladies,
Related to this topic.... I need some feedback from all of you here: http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=46526 I value your opinions very much!
Susan