Zen, you crack me up!!!
Printable View
Zen, you crack me up!!!
Didn't we do the ogling last month?:p
I cannot remember if there's a difference in bulking between fiber types. The thing with cycling is that it's primarily endurance, but I imagine sprinting, climbing and pure distance utilize different muscle fibers to different extents.
I ask (not about the ogling!) because I'm quite sure that my muscle fiber makeup is overwhelmingly slow-twitch. I have no idea what my cadence is (comfortable? :confused: ), but I'm the type that walks a mile faster than they run one, but I'm okay at short distance dead sprints. I'm not a climber. (Okay, so conditioning plays a role there.) I can do short-distance sprinting (getting around stuff or out of a situation I don't want to be in).
I'm more distance than speed, and I feel like my type IIa fibers are permanently out to lunch.
http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2010/...ss-those-legs/
Going on a tangent...On cyclists legs
I'll bet that muscle fiber type is only part of it. Some sprinters can probably exist on ATP longer than other sprinters or pure climbers (ATP=type of energy used for sprints that dissipates quickly.)
hmmmmm THAT can be my excuse...
"sorry, I have the kind of muscle fiber good for endurance, not speed"...
What? Everyone uses that excuse?
Darn, well, I tried :p