Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsairMac
why would you think the back brake is a better choice for MTB? It's ineffective at best: skids & lockup when applied too hard, harder to finesse, The only reason I've heard that back brake is "better" is when people are ignorant of understanding how much more effective front brake usage is. The standard ignorant but well meaning way to teach mountain bike braking is to teach people to never use the front; that way they won't endo or do panic grabs. (in theory)
Case in point: my first year of camp, our coach asks, who here doesn't use the front brake? 28 out of 30 hand went up. It turns out most of us were taught to not use it for a variety of reasons, the primary one being to prevent endo-ing. Tsk, Tsk, tsk. We were all treated to a informative lecture on the proper use of the front brake. In mountain biking ( I can't speak for road at all) the front brake is 70% of your braking power. When you rely on your back brake, you are essentially dragging your bike to a stop, instead of just slowing it. Correct use of the front brake enables you to finesse many thing things, and have much more fine control over the bike.
Sure, using the front brake means creating a level of awareness and sensitivity to the brake/speed relationship. You just can't grab and squeeze the front like you can the back brake. It means learning the art of feathering, modulation and two finger braking. The rewards are improved control in technical areas, better cornering and steeing, and a more confident ride.
If you have having trouble with braking, look into having the reach adjusted on your brake levers. I brought the reach in on mine last year, and WOW what a difference it made on being able to do all of the above with nary a thought.
Irulan
