Printable View
I was just reading some of the responses and it occured to me that when men go to buy pants they have a choice of waist and length: 32waist/30 length... 32 waist/ 31 length, etc, but women have a choice of size 10, 12, etc. It would be nice if you could have choices, say, 2 or 3 chest sizes with different overall sizes. You could call it A,B or C chest (no relation to bra size) with size S,M,L,XL. I would love to have choices that would "customize" my jersey that way.
I love that idea!!Quote:
Originally Posted by roadie gal
BTW, I did the survey :)
I did the survey. Just to reemphasize, I would pay extra for a longer jersey. Sell them in average length and long length for $20 more.
What's a bummer about email collection? That is such a Seattle response. I have lived here all my life and still don't get the privacy fetish endemic to this region.
Just a few things-
1-Can you please remember that your survey should be internationally focused..km's & miles thanks
2-WHy does it matter about the search engine we use?
3-Do i have to fill out the whole questionnaire if all I want to mention is I don't want elastic at the bottom of jerseys?
Good survey & thanks for organizing it :)
Yes CrazyCanuk, I should have asked for miles or km's. I didn't mean to exclude my metric mates. Especially since it's like, 95% of the world! :eek:
Many of you have expressed the desire to have specialty sizes like, a cup, c cup, apple shape, pear shape. Well it's already in the works my lovelies. All in due time...
Thanks to all who have filled out my survey! And if you haven't yet, allez, allez! Get on with it, km's or not!
Hey, Pelotonna, I'm just curious, are you correlating the relationships between different sets of data? You could get some interesting and possibly useful-for-tailoring results that way, like
--if there is a certain height at which a greater percentage of women tend to find jerseys too short-waisted
--if there is a correlation between waist or hip measurement, or waist/hip ratio, and preference for elastic
--if there is a correlation between whether or not one finds jerseys too short and elastic preference
etc...
I'm still digesting everything but I'll let you know when I figure it out!
I think it's pretty basic science:Quote:
Originally Posted by liza
Most jersey elastic goes somewhere around the hips, or at least a little below the waist.
Most women's waists are at least somewhat smaller circumference than their hips.
Elastic that is stretched around something will seek to creep to a place of smaller circumference.
Result: Jersey elastic hem creeping up to your waist instead of staying down like most non-elastic hems do.
:mad:
See, I don't think it's that simple. I have a decidedly female waist/hip ratio, but I'm just fine with elastic hems, unless the jersey is too short (or too narrow at the hem) in the first place. If a jersey is cut to hit my waist and hips properly, than the elastic does its job and keeps the jersey down. If a jersey's waist falls somewhere around my ribs and it's hem falls in the curve between my hip and waist, then yes, elastic will help it ride up (it would probably ride up anyway though; I have some overly short Shebeest jerseys WITHOUT elastic that ride up). That's how it works for me anyway :rolleyes:... Most of my favorite jerseys actually DO have elastic.Quote:
Originally Posted by BleeckerSt_Girl
Not certain how to phrase this...
On jerseys that have elastic at the bottom, and it the botom stays down - does the elastic face have a bit of a "grip" quality to it - as compared to slippery? I think I'll need to do a trial run with my jerseys at home.
Maybe what us curvy types need are jerseys that allow for hips, and elastic that grips?
\_/
/ \
Heh. Unless you're of more apple-y shape. Then, if the jersey isn't long enough to go all the way past the hips (usually resulting in an unusable jersey, because sitting on your jersey is neither comfortable or useful), the smallest circumference is usually somewhere on the ribcage right around the bra band line. Talk about creeping hemlines. (Though I had to laugh the first time that happened to me...round, white exposed tummy on a very busy trail. :eek: I'm surprised there were no accidents around me at the site of it. :D)Quote:
Originally Posted by BleeckerSt_Girl
I did the survey.
I'm begging you, design a jersey that is not tight and has no elastic in the hem in a quick-dry & cool fabric with nice bright colors and graphics that are not girly.
Please.
Also please make it in some sizes besides toddler, extra-small, kinda small, medium-small and might-fit-an-adult-human.
[QUOTE=Kano;332173]I wonder if we need to define "girlie" as opposed to "feminine" maybe????
Which is this?
I thought this one was feminine and classy, not girly.
How about this one?
It took me a while to figure out what this one was. I think it's just strange. I wouldn't wear it.
And this?
This is the best of the 3. It's feminine without being pastel. It's got nice bold colors and a strong design, but is obviously meant for women.
To me, these embody the worst in women's jersery designs:http://www.teamestrogen.com/products.asp?pID=32437 and http://www.teamestrogen.com/products.asp?pID=32449
They both look like mumus.
That mermaid jersey is ick. The Cannondale one is pretty nice. The Beijing one has nice colors, but the writing on it bugs me. I have my phases when I want something more girly (like the Pearl Izumi butterfly one), and sometimes I just want something that isn't girly at all (Castelli pro logo jerseys).Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano