Re: steel? carbon? or steel/carbon combo?
Quote:
Originally posted by caligurl
which is best? all steel? all carbon? or a combination of steel and carbon?
Hi caligurl,
I have an all-carbon bike (Aegis Swift), all steel (Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe), and steel with carbon fork (Terry Isis), and they are all great bikes and very comfortable rides. There is a noticeable difference in weight between most steel and carbon bikes, though. My Aegis comes in at 18.5 lbs including saddle, pedals, wb cages, and small seat bag. The Bike Friday, about 21 lbs, and the Terry, about 23 lbs.
When you're small like us (I'm 5'2" and lightweight also), bike weight is more important than in larger riders, because every lb. you add or subtract from the bike is a higher percentage of your body weight. And when you're already as light as you are, it's not like you can lose another 10 lbs off your body to "lighten up" as many riders could afford to.
If you ride mostly the flats, you might not notice a difference, but for hills, I do better on my lightest bike. I can achieve a higher average speed on that bike than the others. Of course, my Friday has wider tires, which slows me down, but the Terry also has 23c tires. For a given route and effort level, I was about 1 mph slower on my Terry than I am on my Aegis, which is why the Terry is on my trainer now!
However, my Terry is a 2001 model. I expect a brand new Luna with part carbon would be lighter, especially if you equip it with light components, use light wheels, and the like. I have heard wonderful things about Luna and would certainly consider one myself if I were in the market for a custom bike. I've read and agree that frame material is just one of many components to consider when buying a new bike, and that all have their pros and cons. I personally suspect you'd be happy with either carbon or a steel/carbon mix as long as the bike fits you and is beautiful - and I am sure it will be!
Good luck and let us know what you decide...
Emily